TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Column: Sweets and treats? We’re teaching children all the wrong lessons

Many parents use sweet food as a motivation for children, writes Joanna Fortune – but what effect does this have in later life?

Joanna Fortune

DID YOU KNOW…

One in four, or 26 per cent of our nations nine-year-olds are classified as overweight or obese.

Twenty-three per cent of children between one and four are above the recommended weight for their age.

Children as young as five years of age are developing eating disorders and/or presenting with eating disordered behaviour or EDNOS (Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified).

In my own parent/child clinic we are seeing an increasing number of families with children, often very young, presenting with eating disordered behaviour. The question is why are our children developing such an unhealthy relationship with food at such a young age and what does this mean for them as they grow up into adulthood?

There’s the adverse influence of media, society, commercialised play, beauty salons for children, pageants, sexualised clothing (indeed I’ve written about these topics on here before) and how this encourages children to become very body obsessed at far too premature an age – these are all contributing factors. However, there is a much more challenging factor, closer to home.

Think about it for a minute. How do you use food in your home to incentivise behaviour?

When we explore with parents how they incentivise positive behaviours at home, most will admit that they use food – particularly sweet food – as a motivational tool, ie ‘If you tidy the sitting room you can have an ice-cream’ or ‘Oh, you cut your knee, don’t cry, have a chocolate bar,’ or ‘If you do/don’t do what I’m asking you can/cannot have dessert.’

Emotional charge

What this is doing is placing an emotional charge around food for children at a young age. When I feel sad or hurt I eat chocolate to feel better; or I can get Mum/Dad to offer me ice-cream by initially refusing to do what they ask: ‘I did what you asked, so what treat are you going to give me?’

Food should only ever be food, something we eat, and yes, take pleasure in – it’s a social practice, a family time event, an opportunity to sit and talk and share – but it is still just food and something we use to feed ourselves, stay healthy and give us enough energy to achieve all we have to do through the days. Food should never be used as a reward/punishment with children!

Placing an emotional charge around food at a young age allows children to use it as a control tool: refusing to eat, controlling what you cook for them, throwing tantrums unless you give in and give them access to the chocolate tin etc. It also tells children that eating such food is an answer to uncomfortable feelings. It distracts from body regulation, so their eating is not controlled by listening to the cues from their body telling them that they are hungry or full. It teaches them to eat when they are not hungry because they are allowing their emotional states to dictate and be dictated to by food.

Junk food

Placing an emotional charge around food at a young age can have lifelong consequences for children as they grow up. They learn that the answer to emotional challenges does not lie within themselves (to regulate, problem solve and control); nor do they seek such outcomes through relating to others to talk about what is distressing them. Instead, they turn to food, junk food, to “feel better”.

A 2003 study reported in the Eating Behaviours journal asked 122 adults to consider their current eating habits with reference to how they recall their memories about food as children. There was a strong correlation between those adults who had unhealthy relationships with food as adults and those who could recall their parents using food as a reward/punishment tool in their childhoods.

Using food as a reward or punishment tool in your parenting will not only have adverse developmental impact, but it isn’t a sustainable effective tool – it is not one that you, as parent, can stay in control of. Your child learns that they can manipulate you in different situations to get what they want from you. And rather than address the behaviour you are trying to change, it perpetuates it and can make it worse.

I fully understand why this technique is being used. It is (relatively) inexpensive, to hand and can bring immediate short-term behavioural changes. It also teaches that achievement is linked to food: because I did well at something, I will treat myself to a second helping of dessert to celebrate. It places a value system on food, healthier food choices are less valuable as they are never used to reward but rather used as a means to get a reward – ‘If you eat your vegetables you can have ice-cream.’ It is always the sugary, fatty foods that serve as the reward so by association these become more valuable and more enticing to children.

Comfort eating

There are global multi billion euro industries devoted to maintaining an emotional charge around food and equally global multi billion euro industries claiming to help us break those cycles.  Comfort eating is an everyday phrase, and pretty much everybody can name, without hesitation, what their comfort food of choice is as an adult. We have a growing, worldwide and very serious problem with body image and weight related illnesses (both under and over weight). And when our infant children are developing unhealthy relationships to food, we have to look for where they are learning this from and how can we model a different way for them.

Some tasks at home are simply not to be rewarded. They are something that your child must be responsible for doing – such as tidying up their toys. Elsewhere, use time and privilege rather than food to incentivise: you gain or lose 10 minutes of bedtime for certain behaviours, or at the end of a good week you get to sit with Mum/Dad and make an art collage of all the best bits of your week together, or make play-doh at home to build things together.

We also need to embody what we are teaching our children in our own behaviour. Don’t let your child see you using food to reward and/or punish yourself. Limit the amount of talk at home about dieting and cutting food out to lose weight – talk about eating healthy to stay healthy instead. Create positive associations with food for your family.

Joanna Fortune is a clinical psychotherapist working with children and families for over 12 years. She is the founder and director of Solamh Parent Child Relationship Clinic in Dublin. For more info, call 01 6976568 or follow on Twitter: @solamh

Read next:

Comments (39 Comments)

  • Cylon 01/11/12 #

    I live on Belgium. My daughter is 5. There is not one overweight child in her primary school. Not one! Kids
    don’t get much junk here and are generally not allowed bring sweets to school. You never see a child or an Adult walking down the street with the paw shoved in a bag of crisps. Generally eating us kept to mealtimes and that seems to make a difference.

    adult walking down the street

    Reply
  • Sweets have existed for centuries…what is killing us is the food that is meant to be and sold us healthy but in reality is full of crap.

    Reply
  • We all eat sweets growin up and it didn’t do us any harm, the reason we didn’t become obese like the kids today is because we played and socialised outside not on an iPad

    Reply
  • truth be told high fat and high sugar foods have been around for several generations. The problem is the new technology that is entertaining children. So many of them get little or no exercise. Many schools have banned running in playgrounds to lower the risk of children falling and getting hurt and then they go home to stew in front of a television or computer. You can eat all the healthy food in the world but if calories in outnumber calories burned then you’re going to have a weight problem.

    Reply
    • Barry 01/11/12 #

      Mark atleast if you are going to comment and claim stuff know the facts.
      It’s no longer about sugar…. It costs too much, you’ll see that high fructose corn syrup is in thousands upon thousands of food items and is far more addictive then sugar,

      Reply
    • and Barry fructose is……… drum roll please…… sugar!!!

      Reply
    • Actually to be fair you’re probably thinking of the crystallized sugar in bags like in the supermarket. The HFSC you mention is about 24% water and the rest sugars. And to be clear fructose and glucose are both placed firmly under the umbrella term, sugars. please save your condescension and tips on commenting without the facts for when you’ve done some reading yourself.

      Reply
    • The “they’re all sugars” argument has a gaping big hole in it..

      All “sugars” are made up of molecules of glucose – glucose being sugar. Pretty much anything ending in “ose” is a sugar; sucrose, dextrose, maltose, fructose, cellulose etc..
      The difference is the number and the arrangement of the glucose molecules.
      You’ll notice cellulose in that list, this is plant cell walls, or dietary fibre to you and me. This is not unhealthy like “sugar” is deemed to be, it’s your vegetables, grains, seeds, etc. it’s a complex carbohydrate and it’s digested in the colon by bacteria, it’s usually a great source of vitamins and minerals. Glucose is digested in the mouth by amylase, and almost all of the other simple sugars are digested in the stomach by the relevant enzymes.

      Fructose is a bit different.
      Fructose is fruit sugar, and it has no discernible effect on blood sugar levels. The reason for this is because it’s sent straight to the liver for digestion.
      High Fructose Corn Syrup was obviously designed to reduce the impact of 6 teaspoons of sugar in a can of soda on the blood sugar, but it’s pretty concentrated – at least with fruit you get the enzymes, nutrients and fibre content too. The downside is that now the liver is being given so much fructose to digest that it’s being forced to store it as glycogen – this results in fatty liver. Fatty livers are not good.

      Too much glucose or easily digested “simple” sugars raises blood sugar levels sharply. Too much fructose causes fatty liver. Too much fibre or “complex carbohydrates” will make you need to defecate more, but also provide better nutrition..

      They’re all sugars, but I think you will agree, they are most certainly not the same.

      Reply
  • Brilliant article and I think it is true for the majority of people anyway

    Reply
  • If you do your homework, you’ll get this nice head of cabbage!

    Reply
    • Funny when I was a kid that might actually have worked..
      I love my chocolate, don’t get me wrong. But as a kid broccoli and cabbage were my absolute favourites.. Still are, although butternut squash would be up there too now!

      Reply
  • I think the point the author is trying to make is that children shouldn’t be taught to require extrinsic motivators such as food. They don’t help children to self- regulate when the feel upset or when things don’t go their way. To be come emotionally literate children need to move towards intrinsic factors. Receiving special play time with their parent who talks through things when they’re upset is a much more valuable lifelong skill. Handing them a choc bar teaches them nothing and has the undesirable effects of tooth decay obesity etc. Extra parental attention will be a much stronger motivator and more meaningful for the child.

    Reply
  • Ahhhh, Halloween, where kids are encouraged to go to strangers and ask them for sweets… Sugar is crack cocaine to kids and strangely used as a means to control them. Tis a strange world we live in.

    Reply
  • Barry 01/11/12 #

    Pretty much have to agree with all of this, junk food used as a reward system is such a bad idea on so many levels its not even funny!

    Reply
  • A ball of kids called to mine last night i raided the coin jar and gave the little buggers the money i was never going to give for the HHC at least it would be spent in the country hope they had a good one the little monsters.

    Reply
  • Maria 02/11/12 #

    Rewarding kids with food is bad but comforting them with food is even worse. Btw I have noticed that most people are overweight these days. It’s not just the kids we need to worry about.

    Reply
  • The article is pretty much on the mark. There are other factors in life and they do have their impact and place but these do not not negate the points made in the article – as a matter of fact the points made could be very usefully exrapolated to many other areas of life. Unforunately we seem, as a nation, to all too often and all too readily justify the ‘quick (dare we say ‘lazy’) fix’ and at the same stroke relinquish responsibilty. We are inevitably heading down a one-way street where just as surely we will reap what we sow, but no worries, we will concoct another convenient excuse for our irresponsibility. If you are sane and honest, religion has made hypocrites and scoundrels of the masses who are but pawns in a merry-go-round of no responsibility, no honesty, no integrity, no hope, no belief … only every escape clause there is!

    Reply
  • Have to say don’t have a sweet tooth in my head, never ever bought sweets for my now grown up kids while shopping so they really never looked for them, obviously they did have them from time to time…one is a sweetacholic the other the complete opposite! If I ate too many sweet things I would literally feel sick in my stomach.

    Reply
  • John Mc 01/11/12 #

    This is an ad. Food naturally has an effect on emotions simply because of the chemical reactions going on in the brain and body after you eat. There’s an obvious benefit in evolutionary terms to feeling good after eating. What is posted above is an opinion. If there are peer reviewed studies to show that using food items as a positive reinforcers causes obesity long term I’d like to see it. Obviously over eating contributes to this problem but she doesn’t mention lack of exercise or over reliance on technology as factors in obesity. A simple means of weaning kids away from sweets is to use gold stars or points instead of offering a sweet for every household chore done.

    Reply
  • on a thread similar to this, about 8 months ago, another journal reader posted this link. I looked at it out of curiosity, continued re-visiting for a couple of months, then tried it for myself.
    For ME – it has been life-changing. Maybe for some here, it might at the very least be of interest. I’m just so grateful that I stumbled across it, so am doing the same here for somebody else:
    http://www.marksdailyapple.com

    Reply
  • Wait till the drink,fags and drugs era kicks in. Obesity will be the least of their problems. Parents really need to behave more like monks these days. Maybe reward their children with a book to read or an hour of spoken word if they drink their broth after evening prayer.

    Reply
  • I didn’t realise the journal was taking out full page advertisements now.

    Reply
  • When I was in primary school they stopped me having my lunch until i had my ‘comhra ‘ right I always got so stressed I never got it right. 3 years with that teacher. There job was to teach me guess what I learned.

    Reply
  • Broccoli and green leaf vegetables could well be silent killers. Better to have no teeth and live, then to smile and die

    Reply
  • what a load of codswallop, you want to know why their are so many fat, obese children and adults in this country, just go into the grocery store on a friday or saturday and see the amount of junk parents put into their trollys. The are full of biscuits, sweets, chocolate bars, crisps and fizzy drinks and ready made meals. Then they go home and plant themselves in front of the tv, xbox, ipad, laptop or whatever and veg out, kids are happy and no work involved, then at 8 or 9 call the take away. But no tell us all the reason we are turning into a nation of obese is because we got a treat as a child. Really???

    Reply
  • Apologies for the double post…sorry.

    Reply
  • Obviously! What would be interesting is to study what sections of society most engage in this ? Betcha those on social welfare most !

    Reply
    • Actually I’ve seen most people regardless of social welfare payments or not do it… People get stressed in shops (for example) especially after a hard day at work or whatever and its just a way of keeping the child quiet till they get home so I don’t think a particular part of society do it I think it’s just people in general that do reward with sweets

      Reply
    • Maria 02/11/12 #

      Have seen my educated middle class friends do this. It’s not just about junk food either. It’s about engendering an unhealthy attitude towards food in general,’.

      Reply

Add New Comment