TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 7 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

Column: We think of older people as a burden. In fact, they’re anything but.

Our society has become used to regarding older people as a drain, writes Peter Kavanagh. But in these times, everyone has to pitch in.

Peter Kavanagh

I OFTEN GET asked at what age we become ‘older persons’. From a strictly biological point of view, an organism is ‘old’ when it reaches a point at which it could have given birth and successfully raised its offspring to childbearing age. That would make it about 34 years of age in the case of humans, but I think we can say no thirty-something ever wants to be considered an ‘older person’.

So much for biology. How about we look at it sociologically?

Otto von Bismarck established the world’s first ever social safety net in 1889. It took the form of an old age pension for any workers in the German Empire who reached the age of 70 – because very few people in the German Empire in 1889 reached the age of 70. Even a boy born in that very year could only expect to see his fortieth birthday, due to the incredibly high childhood mortality rates and the harsh working conditions.

In more recent decades, we’ve come to accept a definition of roughly 65 years or over as ‘old’, but that can vary wildly. Active Retirement Ireland occasionally uses the slogan ‘life begins at 50′, although we have long-since done away with any age restrictions – our 544 local groups are open to anyone either retired or semi-retired.

Ageing, as you can see, is entirely subjective. The concept of Active Ageing, however, is not. 2012 is the European Year for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations, and it is a great chance for us to reboot our thinking on what ageing means to each and every one of us. For many years now, we have been warned of the impending doom that will arrive with Ireland’s ageing population. By the year 2050, over 28 per cent of Ireland’s population will be 60 years of age or older. This has been called the ‘demographic timebomb’ by many social commentators, who claim that a level of retired people that high will cripple the economy.

‘Drain on society’

This is indicative of how we have seen older people in the past – as a drain on society. Yet this belies the actual situation, where older people are the linchpins of so many local communities through their Active Retirement Associations and other community groups. Retired people support their relatives and peers on a daily basis as childminders, carers and much more. Can older people, can any generation be described as an ‘unfair burden’?

In this European Year, we can start a nationwide conversation about what is needed to make Ireland ‘age-friendly’. Bear in mind, though, that age friendly doesn’t mean friendly just for older people. An Age-Friendly environment is one that supports and aids all of us, of all generations, as we grow older. Having Age-Friendly service provision and planning in towns and counties is as beneficial for the young mother or the schoolchild as it is for the widow or widower in their eighties. The concept of intergenerational solidarity means facing up the reality – no generation wants to profit at the expense of another.

In an era of belt-tightening and austerity, it is easy to target the marginalised of all generations for cutbacks, as has been done recently. While the government can’t shorten winter, they have reduced the winter fuel allowance for anyone in receipt of the Household Benefits Package. With the advent of prescription charges, carbon tax, an increased Drug Payment Scheme threshold, the removal of the ‘Christmas Bonus’ pension payment, unbelievable price increases in fuel and the aforementioned six-week cut in the fuel allowance; older people are, like any other age-group, facing into a grim short-term future.

Claim the dole

What we need to do to address this future is to instigate some joined-up thinking on ageing. The government have addressed the ‘problem’ of increased life expectancies by raising the retirement age to 66 years of age, gradually reaching 68 years by 2028. This has been done while simultaneously removing the transitional pension, meaning that if a worker’s contract forces them to retire at 65, they have no option but to claim the dole until they hit the pensionable age of 66.

If this affects their PRSI contributions, they may not be entitled to claim the full state pension. Neither are there any financial incentive for workers to stay in employment beyond the pensionable age, unlike the UK, where older workers’ pensions are topped up if they defer claiming them for a few years.

Likewise, we face into a budget where services for older people could be cut without a thought for the long-term repercussions. Cutting the Free Travel Scheme will save anything up to €55 million from the Department of Social Protection’s budget, but will add untold multiples of this figure to government spending in knock-on effects. Without free travel, many thousands of older people will not be able to attend hospitals for treatment and will end up in long-term care at a cost to the taxpayer.

Isolation

Many hotels, who rely on Active Retirement Associations to keep them afloat in the off-season, would close without free travel – as would many of their suppliers and surrounding tourist businesses – leading to more workers on the live register. The danger of isolation among older people, especially older men, in rural areas cannot be understated; and the social cost of cutting free travel would be too high to bear. This, like many other supports for everyone in receipt of social transfers, cannot be viewed just as a line on a spreadsheet.

To combat this dichotomy of public service provision, we need a strong, comprehensive National Positive Ageing Strategy to underpin all the actions taken to make Ireland “the best small country in the world to grow old in”, as promised in the Programme for Government. It needs to have an overarching approach and an input into budgeting processes in every department that affects ageing matters in Ireland. It needs to put in place the correct structures that can enable it to be more than just a report on a shelf. Above all, it needs to be a fully-implementable, cross-departmental, multi-sectoral working document.

The NPAS will be published during this European Year for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations, and whether you’re ‘old’ or not – whether you’re in your twenties, your fifties or your nineties – it’s going to be a vitally important document.

After all, whether you think the boundary of ‘old’ is 50, 60, 70 or older, we all want to get there someday.

Peter Kavanagh is a member of the European Year for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations 2012 Steering Group and is the Information & Networking Officer with Active Retirement Ireland.

Read next:

Comments (35 Comments)

  • In the last article about the elderly, I was sad to see very few people interested and giving comments, these elderly are our family that worked so hard in a less financial comfortable time, one was always well off or broke, yet the family unit i believe was better and we took care of each other more, I think its shocking to hear older people are struggling with money worries and loneliness when in actual fact they should be surrounded by grateful offspring who cant do enough to repay them, they may be older now, but they are still the same people they were years….

    Reply
    • People will always see past generations as having 2 things:
      better family unit & tougher economic times.

      Despite the fact that recessions are becoming more frequent and more severe.

      Regardless, far too often older people are described as a “drain” on society.
      What people mean there is isolated to economic drain – and that’s only one facet of society. Older people have a lot of wealth to give society and it’s not just financial aspects that should be seen.

      Reply
  • I am a 69 year old I do not consider myself old,I go to the Gym at 6.30am three times a week and work out for over two hours each occasion I embrace technology ,I am posting this comment from my iPad.During my working life I never asked the State for anything in which country I happened to be living and working in at the time.I see red when I hear these comments about the so called old,do the present working or not generation take nothing from the state?if so why is the department of social protection one the biggest spenders in the Government .older people wake up this Government owes you nothing what we have are entitlements worked and paid for.Point out to your local TD that if they mess with our entitlements they will never see your vote again and meek sure they don’t
    .
    The Spanish have respect for older citizens they are not referred to as old but as the third generation and the country appreciates their past contributions.Ireland of the welcomes is a little different,it seems that it is preferable if we just died and saved the inconvenience and expense.

    Reply
    • good for you. I am in privet practice and before or after work, I exercise for an hour . Retiring would be impossible in this day and age.
      and I have just enrolled to do another degree starting 2013
      I fully intend to live to be a hundred years old just like every one should.

      Reply
  • eaten bread is soon forgotten, the older people of the country never had celtic tigers nor did they destroy the country , let them live in peace as the young of today will be the old of tomorrow.

    Reply
  • Hey Donal sorry if some people saved a few Euro having worked forty odd years perhaps they should have borrowed to the hilt and then look for debt forgiveness.

    Reply
  • Excellent article, well written and researched. My concern for older people today is with the privatisation of home care, where the government have reneged on their responsibility to care for the most vulnerable in our society. There is no regulation of home care services in Ireland today… And that is a frightening fact.

    Reply
  • I have written to both the minister for Health Dr James Reilly and the Minister of Older People Kathleen Lynch, on this issue and have yet to receive an acknowledgement of the letter!

    Reply
    • Kathleen Lynch, don’t hold your breath! She only makes public replies, for votes! Write a public letter in the Irish Examiner, asking her to reply to your letter and you should get a reply? An acknowledgement, If you’re lucky?

      Reply
  • If the government abolishes the free travel scheme they will hand Fianna Fail the best gift since the (dis)appointment of James Reilly. As for a burden, those born between 1972-1987 have borrowed to the hilt to buy land from those born 1945-60 or so. A Basic Income system should replace non-contributory pensions, dole, disability Ie if one can’t work, the State should pay to ensure a dignified life without the bureaucracy.

    Reply
  • It was pointed out to me here recently that there are no old peoples’ homes in Spain. Nor are creches that common. Considering a recent report that childcare now costs most of us more than our mortgages maybe an adopt a granny or grandad scheme could be introduced for those not fortunate enough to have grandparents on the doorstep. It’d keep our new masters in the troika happy as well,as inadequate childcare provision was identified by them as an issue for working parents here.

    Reply
    • “there are no old people’s homes in Spain”
      Incorrect.
      There are in fact thousands of them

      Reply
    • Spain does have retirement homes.

      Reply
    • Yes it’s called The Parliment

      Reply
    • Colm you seem to be suggesting that older people should be used as free baby minders. A lot of grandparents are already doing this to try to help their children pay off staggeringly large mortgages. They and most of the rest of older people have already reared their families, and you think i’s a good idea that they should be conscripted to raise another brood? ‘Adopt a granny’ as you describe it seems geared to helping young families. That may be fine but older people have worked hard and may just want to enjoy a little leisure now – there’s no mention of this in your scenario. Being a grandparent is a joy and a blessing – caring for children full or even part-time is a very responsible and tiring job. Remeber the old saying ‘It’s the second clutch that killed the hen’

      Reply
  • The English have the common sense to send some of their older people to the empty apartments in Spain for the winter. Saves on heating, electricity, cough and cold remedies. It also helps the people who go there, and give them a break from falling on icy footpaths etc. They also have a better outlook, not to mention the views. Bet you would never see our crowd of neer do wells, doing anything like that. Probably want to charge them, full summertime premium prices.

    Reply
  • Haukin perhaps it’s better to drive like a maniac stoned on something and wrap the car around a lamp post.

    Reply
  • There are a lot of very rich old people, with large pensions, extensive assets etc. who have taken no pain in the recession.

    Perhaps Peter could suggest that we rescind all the automatic entitlements that one gets on reaching pensionable age to see if the funds could be better directed to the old people that really need them.

    Reply
    • Donal, there are certainly wealthy people of all generations out there, but let’s not forget that all private pensions are not only paid into over a working life, but are also taxed as income. I don’t think that rescinding benefits automatically would be of any use in this situation, as installing a means-testing system would cost far more in the short-term than it would save. By the way, these “automatic entitlements” one gets on reaching on pensionable age amounts to just the free travel. The household benefits package is already means-tested until age 70; the free medical card is means-tested and only for over 70s.

      As for your assertion that there are “a lot of very rich old people”, that’s not entirely true. There may be quite a few wealthy older people in the State, but the statistics indicate that they are in a minority. The CSO in 2010 stated that “70% of households with an older person living alone, and 44% of households with older couples, live on incomes in the bottom 20% of the income distribution.”

      While there are indeed wealthy older people out there, the plain fact of the matter is that the majority depend on the current social benefits of retirement to keep themselves out of poverty. A blanket cut would do unimaginable harm.

      Reply
  • I don’t trust the state to take care of me in my old age, private pension for me and rental income to shore that up with some extra funds. As for free travel, they’ll have a hell of job taking my car keys off me.

    Reply
  • If you are curious to know what the outcome of a problem, issue etc. ask an older person.. They have seen it all, did it all and got the T-Shirt.

    Reply
  • @Ghandi O’Hagen – whilst I agree with your sentiments on the usefulness of older people your attitude towards the young stinks and makes your comments reek of hypocrisy! The attitudes towards our young people are getting worse by the day and the increasing demonisation of teenagers is every bit as repulsive as any notion of the elderly being a drain. Also, given your age you would have been an teen or in your twenties in the 60′s? Hardly a generation entitled to lecture us about casual drug use!

    Reply
    • Joseph I certainly had any intention of demonising this or any other generation.Life has taught me that there is good and not so good in every generation.I know a lot of young people who are great and interact with very well,my comment was in response to an inane point made by a previous contributor who assumed all older people drive slowly which is untrue,with regards to the sixty’s you are right but don’t generalise I am Irish but Idid my degree in the UK in the sixtys while working part time and playing in a group to make ends meet.I was offered drugs daily everything from uppers to more serious stuff which I declined not because I’m perfect but out of fear of being not able to controle it .
      We of the swinging sixty’s take full responsibility for what we got wrong now it’s your turn to do the same.

      Reply
  • I hope the free bus passes stay, when you see the white haired rows on the buses think kindly they are out of the home and not thinking about the cold or the pain they have, the mere fact of seeing another person to say hello to or to open the mind to new vistas as they visit different areas, don’t deny them this one free pleasure, please think before acting for votes, save money other ways, plus this travel does give the elderly a lift which I feel sure helps the health of many of them, I know I’m one of the white haired travellers, I see daily benefit fraudsters caught and punished but only a tip of a very ugly iceberg, get more of this stopped and one will save millions, how on earth do they trick the different units that control our monies, mind boggling, thanks for space to air ones feelings.

    Reply
  • This article is disgusting. Ireland and her people have never seen it’s old folk as ‘a drain’. That’s a purely British mentality. Leave them alone!

    Reply
    • Hi Carol. When writing the article I was thinking of such high-profile individuals as Colm McCarthy (of “an Bord Snip”) who stated publicly such nonsense as “If people used to snuff it at 70 and now they’ve decided to snuff it at 80 or 85 or 90, then something’s got to give… ”

      There is a huge element of the population who do indeed view older people as a drain on society. We can see it in phrases like “demographic timebomb” or “pensions crisis”. I see this reality every day working with older people in Ireland.

      I’m sorry you think the article is “disgusting”, but if you read it, you’ll see that I’m pushing for a recognition of what older people actually contribute to society.

      Reply
    • Hi Carol could you please add some substance to that sweeping statement about the British. Do you have any evidence either based on a study or through the ever reliable here say? Or are you perhaps engaging in some casual racism with your statement?

      Reply
    • The British are also to blame for the bad weather.

      Reply
  • “From a purely biological point of view old is 34″. Are you just making this stuff up? I’m seriously losing faith in the journal…

    Reply
    • Hi Arty. The legal age of consent in Ireland is 17. If you have a child at 17 and raise him/her to legal childbearing age (i.e. 17), you have fulfilled all biological conditions for life and are technically “old”. But it’s just a lighthearted intro, so don’t read too much into it. It’s not the point I’m making at all.

      Reply
  • Its good to know that, despite being slow and dangerous behind the wheel, old people can still serve a purpose.

    Don’t you go dyin’ on me now!

    Reply

Add New Comment