We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Pepsi is one of the household names that took advantage of the rules. AP/Press Association Images

Double Irish? Peh, global brands used Luxembourg to avoid billions in tax

Pepsi, IKEA and Irish multinational Glanbia all took advantage of secret deals.

HUNDREDS OF THE world’s biggest companies have brokered secret deals with Luxembourg to avoid paying billions of dollars in taxes according to a trove of leaked documents.

After a six-month investigation the US-based International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) found household firms such as Pepsi, IKEA and Deutsche Bank were among companies which had taken advantage of legal tax avoidance schemes with Luxembourg.

The Irish Times published some of the documents last night and reports that Irish food multinational Glanbia put about €1 billion into Luxembourg based companies that had no employees.

The ICIJ said it had reviewed around 28,000 pages of leaked documents which detailed complex financial structures that enabled companies to dramatically slash their tax liabilities.

The organisation said hundreds of billions of dollars had been funneled through Luxembourg as part of the agreements, wiping billions of dollars in taxes from the companies’ bottom lines.

Global accounting giant PricewaterhouseCoopers had helped the companies in question secure at least 548 tax rulings in Luxembourg between 2002 and 2010 according to an ICIJ analysis of the documents.

The documents uncovered details of Advance Tax Agreements — deals which set out how companies will be taxed.

“It’s like taking your tax plan to the government and getting it blessed ahead of time,” the ICIJ quoted Connecticut School of Law tax expert Richard Pomp as saying.

“And most are blessed. Luxembourg has a very user-friendly tax department.”

The ICIJ said its investigation had involved a team of more than 80 journalists from 26 countries working for outlets including The Guardian, Le Monde and Germany’s Suddeutsche Zeitung.

‘Magical fairyland’ 

The Guardian said in its report of the investigation that the arrangements forged between the companies and the tiny EU member state were “perfectly legal.”

But it said the agreements were enabling tax avoidance on “an industrial scale.”

Other companies that benefited from the schemes included Burberry, Procter & Gamble, Heinz, JP Morgan and FedEx.

The ICIJ said some companies had been able to achieve effective tax rates of less than one percent on profits channeled through Luxembourg.

It said many cases involved Luxembourg subsidiaries of the companies in question, even if they maintained only a marginal business presence in the country. It said 1,600 companies were registered at one address alone.

The Guardian quoted US Treasury tax expert Stephen Shay as saying Luxembourg was akin to a “magical fairyland.”

“Clearly the database is evidencing a pervasive enabling by Luxembourg of multinationals’ avoidance of taxes [around the world],” said Shay, a Harvard Law School professor who gave expert testimony during a US Senate investigation last year into Apple’s tax avoidance structures.

The revelations come against a backdrop of mounting scrutiny by authorities worldwide of tax arrangements involving major firms.

Last month, the EU snagged Internet titan Amazon in a widening probe into sweetheart tax deals for major multinationals, saying they were unfair to competitors and taxpayers.

The move follows similar probes announced in September into US tech icon Apple in Ireland, coffee-shop chain Starbucks in the Netherlands, and the financial arm of Italian automaker Fiat, also in Luxembourg like Amazon.

European Union anti-trust regulators will examine if Amazon’s tax arrangements with Luxembourg amount to illegal state aid, giving the company an unfair advantage.

Glanbia statement

Headquartered and managed in Ireland, Glanbia today said that it has an effective corporation tax rate of 17% on its worldwide earnings.

“The majority of the Group’s 2013 corporate tax payments were made to the Irish exchequer,” it continued. “The Group is tax compliant in all of the jurisdictions in which it operates.”

It has group companies in Luxembourg which it says are “part of inter-group financing arrangements underpinning our international operations”.

“These are clearly identifiable as Glanbia companies. The Group is cognisant of its obligations under Irish and international tax law and is fully committed to compliance and reporting requirements in all jurisdictions in which the Group operates.”

© – AFP 2014 with Sinéad O’Carroll

Read: Minister Bruton is going to the US to explain the death of the ‘Double Irish’ tax loophole >

Read: Remember Bono said he helped bring Google and Facebook to Ireland? Well, he did >

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.