#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Dublin: 13°C Saturday 21 May 2022
Advertisement

Timeline: How the Novak Djokovic Australia controversy unfolded over the past week

The world tennis number one is to be released from detention after winning his court battle.

Novak Djokovic
Novak Djokovic
Image: Alamy Stock Photo

WORLD NUMBER ONE Novak Djokovic had languished in a Melbourne detention centre since Thursday morning after having his Australian visa cancelled over his Covid-19 vaccine status.

But the 34-year-old, who is hoping to defend his Australian Open title and win a record 21st Grand Slam title, won a court appeal today and has been ordered released from detention as the Australian government decides its next steps.

In a tweet this afternoon, Djokovic said he is “pleased and grateful” at the court decision. 

“Despite all that has happened, I want to stay and try to compete @AustralianOpen. I remain focused on that,” he said. 

“I flew here to play at one of the most important events we have in front of the amazing fans.” 

Here’s a look at how the drama, which has reverberated around the world, has unfolded:

Tuesday, 4 January

Djokovic said he was heading to the Australian Open to defend his title after being granted a medical exemption to play.

All participants at the Australian Open, which starts on 17 January, need to be vaccinated against Covid-19 or have a medical exemption, assessed by an independent panel of experts.

His participation at the opening Grand Slam of the year at Melbourne Park had been subject of intense speculation for months.

“I’m heading Down Under with an exemption permission. Let’s go 2022!” the nine-time Australian Open winner said on Instagram.

Wednesday, 5 January

Australian Open tournament chief Craig Tiley said 26 players or their support staff from the 3,000 or so travelling had asked for an exemption, but only a few were successful.

“There’s been no special favour. There’s been no special opportunity granted to Novak,” said Tiley.

Stephen Parnis, a former Australian Medical Association vice-president, said it sent an “appalling message” to people trying to stop the spread of Covid-19.

“I don’t care how good a tennis player he is. If he’s refusing to get vaccinated, he shouldn’t be allowed in,” Parnis said on Twitter.

Djokovic landed at Melbourne airport on Wednesday night.

Thursday, 6 January

Australia said it had cancelled the entry visa of Djokovic on his arrival in Melbourne after quizzing Djokovic during the early hours.

“I am not vaccinated,” Djokovic told Australian border control, according to a transcript released by the federal court today.

The Serbian ace had repeatedly refused to confirm in public if he had been inoculated.

“Mr Djokovic failed to provide appropriate evidence to meet the entry requirements to Australia, and his visa has been subsequently cancelled,” the Australian Border Force said in a statement.

Djokovic was moved to an immigration detention centre while his lawyers lodged an appeal.

The incident sparked an immediate spat.

Serbia President Aleksandar Vucic said he spoke with Djokovic over the phone and told him that “the whole of Serbia is with him and that our authorities are undertaking all measures in order that maltreatment of the world’s best tennis player ends as soon as possible”.

The player’s father Srdjan said his son was “held captive for five hours”.

“Jesus was crucified and endured many things but is still alive among us,” he said on Orthodox Christmas Eve. “Novak is also crucified … the best sportsman and man in the world. He will endure.”

However, Djokovic’s long-time rival and fellow 20-time major winner Rafael Nadal said: “He made his own decisions and everybody is free to take their own decisions, but then there are some consequences.”

Friday, 7 January

Djokovic thanked fans for their support.

“Thank you to people around the world for your continuous support. I can feel it and it is greatly appreciated,” he wrote on Instagram.

Czech doubles player Renata Voracova, who also entered on an exemption as she had recently recovered from Covid, ended up in the same detention facility as Djokovic.

The 38-year-old told Czech media the centre “is like a prison” with guards on every floor.

Saturday, 8 January

Djokovic was given a Covid-19 vaccine exemption because he tested positive for the virus on 16 December, his lawyers said in a 32-page court filing.

However, it was then claimed that Djokovic was at a young players event in Belgrade the following day without a mask.

#Open journalism No news is bad news Support The Journal

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support us now

The Belgrade tennis federation, in a Facebook post after the 17 December ceremony, reported that Djokovic had handed over cups and awards to the best young players of 2021.

His lawyers also claimed that he was held at Melbourne airport on his arrival for eight hours, mostly incommunicado.

Voracova left Australia.

Sunday, 9 January

Australia’s government in court filings said Djokovic is not vaccinated against Covid-19 and his legal battle to stay in the country should be dismissed.

Government lawyers rejected a separate argument that Djokovic was treated unfairly because he was pressured into letting a border agent take a decision on his visa without giving him extra time to rest and consult his lawyers.

Judge Anthony Kelly ordered today’s hearing to go ahead, refusing a government request to adjourn until Wednesday.

Monday, 10 January

Djokovic’s appeal hearing opened this morning, but was repeatedly delayed by glitches as the court’s online system crashed due to a surge of worldwide interest.

After several delays and arguments made by Djokovic’s legal team and Canberra’s lawyers, the world number one won a stunning victory over the Australia government.

The judge ordered that he “be released immediately and forthwith from immigration detention”.

The presiding judge overturned the cancellation of the unvaccinated star’s visa, ending his detention.

The government conceded that the way it conducted the airport interview was “unreasonable” because the player was not given the chance to reply fully before his visa was torn up.

Had Djokovic been given until 8.30am to respond as first promised, the judge said, “he could have consulted others and made submissions to the delegate about why his visa should not be cancelled.”

A government lawyer said Immigration Minister Alex Hawke may decide to use his “personal power of cancellation” to intervene in the case despite the legal victory.

© AFP 2022

About the author:

AFP

Read next:

COMMENTS (12)

This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
write a comment

    Leave a commentcancel