TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Algeria: 18 killed – including seven hostages – in ‘final assault’

Algerian security forces are now thought to be sweeping the gas plant to remove landmines planted around it.

The Krechba gas plant on the In Salah gas field in Algeria's Sahara Desert where the hostage crisis began this week.
The Krechba gas plant on the In Salah gas field in Algeria's Sahara Desert where the hostage crisis began this week.
Image: ALFRED DE MONTESQUIOU/AP

SEVEN FOREIGN HOSTAGES and 11 Islamist gunmen were killed when a Sahara desert stand-off ended in a bloodbath, according to Algerian security forces.

The heavily armed gunmen from a group known as “Signatories in Blood” had been holed up in the In Amenas gas complex since they took up to 41 foreign workers hostage in a dawn assault on Wednesday.

“The (army) assault took place mid-morning. Eleven terrorists lost their lives along with the foreign hostages,” the security source told AFP.

“We think they were killed in retaliation” for the army attack, the source said.

The gunmen, cited by Mauritania’s ANI news agency, said earlier today they were still holding “seven foreign hostages,” denying claims of more.

“Signatories in Blood”, led by Algerian Mokhtar Belmokhtar, a former senior Al-Qaeda commander in north Africa, were demanding an end to French intervention against Islamists in neighbouring Mali, ANI reported earlier.

Belmokhtar also wanted to exchanging American hostages for the blind Egyptian sheikh Omar Abdul Rahman and Pakistani Aafia Siddiqui, jailed in the United States on charges of terrorist links.

But US State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said “the United States does not negotiate with terrorists.”

Yesterday an Algerian security official had said troops were trying to reach a “peaceful” end to the crisis, before “neutralising the terrorist group that is holed up in the plant and freeing a group of hostages still being held there.”

Amid a virtual news blackout in Algiers, harshly criticised by local media, world leaders took a tough stand on the fate of the remaining hostages.

US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta said Washington would “take all necessary steps to protect our people” from the threat of Al-Qaeda-affiliated militants in north Africa.

“Whether or not that involves assisting others with military operations, whether it involves developing in a cooperative way operations there, those are areas that I think remain to be decided,” he told the BBC.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told a news conference with Japanese Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida of her deep concern “about those who remain in danger. Utmost care must be taken to preserve innocent life.”

At least one American had already been confirmed dead before today’s final assault.

Confusion over surrounding numbers

Yesterday the militants gave a breakdown of three Belgians, two Americans, one Japanese and a Briton, although Belgium said there was no indication any of its nationals were being held.

An Algerian security official had put the remaining number of foreign hostages at 10.

Norway’s Statoil, which jointly operates the In Amenas site with Britain’s BP and Sonatrach of Algeria, said two Norwegians have been found alive but six others remain unaccounted for.

In Tokyo, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe ordered his government to do everything possible to ensure the safety of those Japanese unaccounted for in “an extremely despicable” incident that “can never be forgiven.”

France, which today said 2,000 of the 2,500 troops it had pledged were now on the ground in Mali, said on Saturday that no more of its citizens were being held.

Of the French intervention in Mali, Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said at a meeting in Abidjan that “France was obliged to intervene very, very rapidly, otherwise there would have been no more Mali.”

Algerian news agency APS quoted a government official as saying the kidnappers, who claimed to have come from Niger, were armed with machineguns, assault rifles, rocket launchers and missiles.

This was confirmed by an Algerian driver, Iba El Haza, who said the hostage-takers spoke in different Arabic dialects and perhaps also in English.

“From their accents I understood one was Egyptian, one Tunisian, another Algerian and one was speaking English or (another) foreign language,” Haza told AFP, two days after escaping during the army’s Thursday attack.

“The terrorists said: ‘You have nothing to do with this, you are Algerians and Muslims. We won’t keep you, we only want the foreigners.’”

Algeria’s El Watan daily quoted a former military officer as justifying the army’s assault on Thursday, saying: “All hesitation is forbidden when the future of the nation is at stake or being threatened.”

The final death tolls, of both foreign and Algerian hostages and of gunmen, was not yet known.

Read next:

Comments (29 Comments)

  • Algeria’s government said no negotiation no blackmail. They are right & this will make would-be kidnappers more difficult to carry the suicidal mission in the future.

    Reply
  • I would consider 7 hostages killed a catastrophic failure.

    Reply
    • It’s a success seeing as they had a few hundred captive. The Algerians have also taken away the real conclusion the fanatics needed. They needed Muslims in northern Africa to see that Algeria was weak and asked the West for help. This was not allowed to happen and the Algerian government’s position has been strengthened. Good on them and hopefully a new Syria will not appear.

      Reply
  • He is very cruel rebel to hold some innocent people is at hostage. He excute some people but they were innocent. I hope that government have very serious to discuss about them and hope to arrest him and his group. Poor people is to excute for this is very wrong.

    Reply
  • @ Liam. Thank you for reply. You are right. Each country would hope to be able to protect it’s citizens. Absolutely. However, unforeseen(or perhaps, well foreseen) results from the war on terror include the terrorist using the very same counter-insurgency tactics used on them in the past to hurt other nations. My original comment was merely to say the terrorists are using US methods to hurt other nations now, ie, boomerang, and all because they wanted oil, world hegemony and to create fear. And the US sit back and laugh, sell arms to help both sides defend themselves, and laugh some more!

    Reply
    • Liam 19/01/13 #

      @RP McMurphy – “and all because they wanted oil, world hegemony and to create fear”, world hegemony is not possible, the United States know this, even if they did try, and somehow managed to succeed, the reward of trying to implement it, is not worth the cost that the U.S. would no doubt have to pay, America might be the most powerful nation in the world but they are not more powerful than the world.

      Reply
    • The gas field that they attacked is a joint venture between BP, statoill and Algeria. What do the Americans have to do with this?!

      Reply
    • Liam 19/01/13 #

      @ Declan Noonan – Thanks for pointing that out Declan, I have not been following this story closely and was unaware of that, since RP referred to the “US’s ‘War on Terror’!”, I assumed that the U.S. was involved.

      Reply
    • They are always quick to blame the US on Pretty much everything.this place was attacked due to French intervention in Mali.which if I’m not mistaken isn’t even on the same continent as the US.

      Reply
    • Liam, my comment was aimed at R P mcmurphy.

      Reply
  • So sad. Another to add to the list of boomerangs from US’s ‘War on Terror’!

    Reply
  • Liam
    I know the guys are working there to make a living and support their families , they are usually highly skilled workers too. And again yes in a situation where the host country is not trying or not capable of rescuing the victims then by all means send in the troops as they say …. I am not saying Ireland should be exempt because I reckon(and I hope never to be proved right or wrong on this) that Ireland would deal with the situation before we called for help. No problem Liam , I enjoy a good discussion /Debate . Thank you too for your replies.

    Reply
  • @ Liam and Declan. The remainder of hostages at this site are in the majority US citizen I believe. Why else is there a US registered aircraft on the Tarmac ready for pick up? Not trying to be anti U.S. in any way, just that they are always there! Covert or not!!

    Reply
    • They are there to look after their own citizens and interests. More than we can say for some other countries. Look at ur history and tell me where do u think the world would be today without Americas intervention in the last two world conflicts. Sometimes we are quick to criticise but even quicker to ask for assistance when the going gets tough

      Reply
    • RP, what are you talking about when you say that the “majority” of these hostages are Americans? There are only a handful out of hundreds taken hostage.

      Reply
  • @ Liam. I don’t understand your comment Liam. Are u asking what should be the best response or non- response? Please elaborate.

    Reply
    • Liam 19/01/13 #

      @ RP McMurphy – No, I was merely stating that when someone attacks you or in this case civilians belonging to your country, you have a right to intervene.

      Reply
    • Liam
      No you do not have a right to intervene UNLESS that country are not doing anything to resolve the situation OR it is THAT country w ho are holding your citizen hostage.
      It is desperately sad that these hostages died and my heartfelt sympathy goes to their grief stricken families and friends.Algeria did the right thing and it is tragic that anyone died .

      Reply
    • Liam 19/01/13 #

      @ Eileen – Actually countries still have the right to intervene regardless of the reasons that you stated, what if the country in question was aware of foreign nationals being held hostage on their territory and were not able to deal with the hostage takers? Yet the country which the hostages where from, did have the means to end the situation successfully, should that country still not be allowed to intervene?

      Reply
    • Hi Liam
      In that case if the country where they are held hostage did not deal with the situation then Yes by all means get them out . However in this case Algeria went in and dealt with the situation. Who can judge how successful an operation will be when dealing with terrorists? I do not know the legalities behind these decisions , but if it happened here that foreign nationals were held hostage etcetc then would we allow that country to send their special operators in to rescue them ? ? Any way the job is done and 7 innocent live s are over . These guys know the danger of working in these hostile places , and that too was their choice. It is very sad and to be honest scarey. Statoil will have to rethink their security for their staff too.

      Reply
    • Liam
      For what its worth this is only my opinion , as I see it .

      Reply
    • Liam 19/01/13 #

      @ Eileen Gabbett – If foreign nationals were being held in our country by terrorists and we were not able to bring about a successful end to the situation, then by all means a foreign country should send their operators into Ireland (also the foreign nation that is sending in its operators should and most likely would, notify the Irish authorities), also if you disagree, why should Ireland be exempt from this?

      And you are right when you say that “These guys knew the danger of working in these hostile places”, however it is worth pointing out that a steady form of employment is hard to come by these days, and these workers were only trying to make a living. Anyway thanks for the reply.

      Reply
  • @Ciaran Clarke, Celtic boyo or whatever….France or Mali….which is not where in relation to whom??

    Reply

Add New Comment