Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

PA Wire/PA Images
RIGHT TO PRIVACY

EU and Canada's attempts to fight terrorism by sharing airline passenger details deemed illegal

The deal cannot be passed as it breaches privacy laws.

AN EU-CANADA deal to share air passenger data in a bid to fight terrorism cannot be passed in its present form as it would breach “fundamental” rights , the EU’s top court ruled today.

The deal which the European Union and Ottawa began negotiating in 2010 would interfere with the right to privacy, the Luxembourg-based European Court of Justice said in a statement.

“The court declares that the agreement envisaged between the European Union and Canada on the transfer of passenger name record data may not be concluded in its current form,” the European Court of Justice said in a statement.

“Several of its provisions are incompatible with the fundamental rights recognised by the EU,” the court said.

In 2010, the EU and Canada began negotiating an agreement to transfer and process so-called passenger name record (PNR) data that passengers give airlines, travel agents and tour operators when they make flight reservations and check-in for flights.

US-style PNR data includes itineraries, ticket types, contact details, baggage information and payment information.

But the court said transferring the data would “entail an interference with the fundamental right to respect for private life”.

“Similarly, the envisaged agreement entails an interference with the fundamental right to the protection of personal data.”

The EU has similar passenger deals with the United States and Australia.

The court’s decision comes after it struck down in 2015 a EU-US arrangement allowing firms like Facebook and Google to transfer the personal information of European citizens to the United States.

That decision followed a case in which Austrian activist Max Schrems sued Facebook in Ireland, citing US snooping practices exposed by former US intelligence contractor Edward Snowden.

The EU and the United States have since reached a new internet privacy deal.

© – AFP, 2017

Read: ‘It’s a disaster area. There’s nothing left’: Wildfires rage over south-east of France

Read: Warning of ‘huge public health problem’ as men’s sperm counts have halved in last 40 years

Your Voice
Readers Comments
9
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.