TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Penneys, M&S, Tesco and more sign up to code on children’s clothes.

The guidelines lay out rules for underwear, swimwear and footwear, as well as slogans and fabrics.

In 2010 Primark in the UK withdrew padded bikinis but continued to sell padded bras for children.
In 2010 Primark in the UK withdrew padded bikinis but continued to sell padded bras for children.
Image: File/Jeff Moore/Jeff Moore/Empics Entertainment

NO SEXUALLY SUGGESTIVE imagery or slogans, fabrics that provide for modesty and age appropriate swimwear are among the guidelines included in Retail Ireland’s voluntary code for children’s clothes.

Care to differentiate between children’s underwear and adult lingerie, appropriate colour ranges and stable and supporting footwear are also part of the guidelines, which were launched today.

Bras should be labelled by bust and cup size rather than age, and no mention should be made of “enhancement” or “underwiring” on underwear aimed at the under-12s. Meanwhile the guidelines recommend that the choice of decoration or embellishment on footwear should be “pretty” rather than “adult”.

Tesco, Penneys and Marks and Spencer are among the retailers who have agreed to sign up to the code, joined by Arnotts, Brown Thomas, Clerys, Debenhams, House of Fraser, Next and TK Maxx. Other retailers are also being invited to adopt the guidelines.

The code was requested by Minister for Children Frances Fitzgerald and she said today that “preserving the special space that is childhood is a key priority of government”.

Labour TD Aodhán Ó Ríordáin has called on the government to make addressing the sexualisation and commercialisation of children a priority, and today he is welcoming the code, saying it is a first step in tackling an enormous problem in society.

He said that he hope statutory guidelines will follow.

Today’s document also dictates that childrenswear should be marketed towards to adults that are buying it, and that the use of child models is only acceptable within defined parameters.

The code covers clothes for children under the age of twelve and does not include dressing-up clothes or toys, teenage fashion or babywear.

Parents concerned about ‘commercialisation and sexualisation’ of children – survey>

Calls for research into sexualisation and commercialisation of Irish children>

Read next:

Comments (20 Comments)

  • Thank God. Does that mean an end to those horrific Playboy bunny branded clothes for kids?

    Reply
  • Sorry, I think it’s the parents cos its the same as fast food, the kids are not buying it they don’t have the cash!

    Reply
  • Thats a start..but girls are easily influence by what their friend is wearing and what they see…

    Reply
  • Thank u god 4 boys!

    Reply
  • About time

    Reply
  • Fingers crossed!

    Reply
  • jrbmc 28/06/12 #

    About time, but vodafone could do with looking at there new TV ad, two kids wearing shorts and dancing with the camera focused on their rears

    Reply
  • Penneys – clothes for kids made by kids

    Reply
  • It s great to see how quickly this was agreed upon compared to other issues of national interest. Penney’s were by far the biggest culprit in slut fashion and pedophile friendly signifiers on child clothing. We galloped all the way from religious prudery to wholesale sexual abandon in child fashions . But it seems to be very much a trend in the budget fashion stores aimed at lower income families – who , once saddled with these ‘trends’ are forced to buy as they have little options elsewhere for cheap clothing for their families. It smacked a little of social engineering – a well endowed purse shopping at NEXT or TOPSHOP is served a much more palatable offering than the struggling parent searching for a wardrobe on a tight budget. One could be forgiven for thinking that behind the trends there was another intent in influencing culturally the youth generation of budding consumers – very tied in to the trash cash music industry . Yes – edit the video contents too, far too much slutting it up to impressionable teenage boys and girls.

    Reply
  • A need for padded bras?? Oh please!!! Even my daughter (14) hates them, claiming them to be hot and uncomfortable.

    Reply
  • It’s really another example of do what we say, not what we do (similar to alcohol, smoking etc), isn’t it?

    If as an adult woman you twist your whole life to fit some weird and perverse notion of attractiveness – such as make-up, fake tan, false eyelashes, beauty treatments, constant and expensive hair maintenance, push up bras, obsession with appearance, high heel shoes that mean you effectively can’t walk properly, and generally an unhealthy obsession with changing your natural appearance, then is that not more of the problem, rather than the age at which you are allowed to partake in these dubious obsessions?

    They don’t lick it off the ground you know.

    Reply
  • Again with the ‘padded’ bras, seriously they are slightly padded as in 0.5 of a centimetre.
    They are not push up bras, or wonder bras.
    They a slightly padded to provide extra protection to the breast buds of developing girls and to even out their appearance cos often one will develop first leaving the girl self concious.

    By all means ban boob tubes, mini skirts, tracksuits with juicy on them and the playboy bunny
    but leave the padded bras alone there is a need for them.

    Reply
    • Never needed padded bras when I was young, my daughters never needed them. So unless young girls are somehow developing differently these days there is no need for padded bras on children..put a vest on them.

      Reply
    • Sharrow 29/06/12 #

      I have an 12 year old, they make her feel more comfortable, it’s that simple.
      Nothing wrong with innovation, other wise our daughters would be looking at using maxi pads.

      Reply

Add New Comment