Welcome to our Public Beta Site - What does this mean?
Dublin: 12 °C Wednesday 23 May, 2012

Colombian president urges rethink on drugs war

Colombian police stand guard over seized packages of cocaine in Puerto Gaitan, Colombia on 13 October 2011.
Colombian police stand guard over seized packages of cocaine in Puerto Gaitan, Colombia on 13 October 2011.
Image: AP Photo/William Fernando Martinez/PA Images

COLOMBIAN PRESIDENT Juan Manuel Santos has called on international governments to rethink their position on controlled substances, suggesting that some should be widely legalised.

Speaking to John Mulholland of the Observer, Santos said he is willing to discuss the legalisation of marijuana “and more than just marijuana” in an effort to cut profitability from the illegal drugs trade.

He said Colombia has paid a high price for being the source of drugs for the west, losing “out best judges, our best politicians, our best journalists, our best policeman” in the continuing war against drugs. Santos said that huge progress had been made against the country’s drug cartels, but that the situation requires an international review of how the war on drugs is fought.

Colombia isn’t the only country taking a stand on the supply of drugs issue: Mexican President Felipe Calderón recently criticised the US for failing to deter its citizens from buying drugs though Mexico.

The Mexican government lost one of its top security officials Francisco Blake Mora in a helicopter accident this weekend. Interior Minister Mora was largely seen as the government’s face in its war against drug trafficking.

Earlier today, Brazilian security forces stormed Rio’s largest slum as part of its ongoing efforts to quash drug trafficking and cartels ahead of the 2014 World Cup and 2016 Olympics.

Read more: Brazil: Rio’s most-wanted trafficker caught>

Read Next:

Comments (15 Comments)

  • ponythegringo 13/11/11 #
    Report this comment

    Obviously this guy is accepting u.s. Aid but not believing their bullshit, Bravo!

    Reply
  • Paul 13/11/11 #
    Report this comment

    Some drugs are dangerous and their addictive nature means that they enslave their users. Obviously this is the kind of power over people that the state should allow dangerous criminals a monopoly.

    Reply
  • Sean Claffey 13/11/11 #
    Report this comment

    Legalise! The weed at least.

    Reply
  • Derek Durkin 13/11/11 #
    Report this comment

    The war on drugs make no sense at all. Legalise all drugs, use the money for rehabilitation and education and u will see drug use drop as shown in countries like portugal. It would also have a huge benefit towards crime and the ensuing court and prison debacle.

    Reply
  • Lou Brennan 13/11/11 #
    Report this comment

    Yeah. If you can’t beat them join them.

    Reply
  • simon powderly 13/11/11 #
    Report this comment

    Course he wants to legalise drugs! It’s Colombia!! it’d be like hitting oil! If the Colombian government could sell their number one product legally around the world they’ll be rolling in it!!

    Reply
  • Report this comment

    To comment first u have to know about the topic is not just about to legalise it and sell legal drugs, is not about become a new Amsterdam is about end these bloodbath, the cartels make billions of dollars every year so if u legalise no one will buy drugs because they will grow them in their on houses, if the prize to the end these drug war is to become a new Amsterdam go for it if u don’t like drugs easy do not use them, no one put a gun in ur head to buy drugs but u put a gun in innocent people head to sell them

    Reply
  • Niall Carson 13/11/11 #
    Report this comment

    Ever president before him said the same as soon as they left office.

    Reply
  • William Grogan 13/11/11 #
    Report this comment

    Making drugs illegal is 100% illogical.

    Reply
  • Cyril Butler 13/11/11 #
    Report this comment

    The legalisation of soft drugs is a no brainer. Even if it were true that there were major health implications, a fraction of the budget involved in policing and jailing, community watch etc would pay for a first class health service. While drugs, like alcohol, do pose real health risks simply banning them has not worked and never will. The whole idea was born out of the American neocon movement and is trying to impose their religious values on the rest of society at enormous economic and social cost. The fuelling of gangland warfare and criminality is worse than the problem of drugs themselves and has wrecked working class areas of every city on earth.

    Reply
  • Malcolm Kyle 14/11/11 #
    Report this comment

    Historically, the prohibition of any mind altering substance has never succeeded in providing what is needed, which is a safer environment for all the users, addicts, their families and society at large. We can therefore safely state: Prohibition will always spawn far worse conditions than those it’s ignorant supporters claim to be able to alleviate.

    While it is true that taking any drug (especially alcohol and tobacco) can sometimes indirectly affect others, this exact same argument was used to implement and painfully prolong alcohol prohibition during the 1920s. Alcohol related homicide, violence, wife battering and child neglect were definitely not curtailed, nor were they even slightly ameliorated during this earlier period of national Wack-a-Mole insanity. Not only did Prohibition exacerbate all of the above problems it also increased usage while bootleggers like many of our present day drug lords became rich and powerful folk heroes as a result. http://i.imgur.com/Ga1Gs.png

    Similar to Alcohol Prohibition in the 1920s, Drug Prohibition has given us rampant corruption, off the scale criminality, a bust economy and mass unemployment. On top of all this, it has gifted us the planet’s highest incarceration rate, a civil war in Mexico, an un-winnable war in Afghanistan and an even higher rate of drug-use (legal & illegal) than in all other countries, including those that have far more libertarian policies.

    When we regulate (as apposed to prohibit) a substance we do NOT automatically condone it’s use; the regulations concerning alcohol and tobacco are there to protect us from the vast increase in criminality that would otherwise exist if these substances were prohibited instead of properly regulated.

    A regulated and licensed distribution network for all mind altering substances would put responsible adult supervision in between children and their otherwise premature access to drug distribution outlets. Regulated and licensed distribution would reflect and respect society’s values thus preventing children obtaining easy access to these dangerous substances. What we need is legalized regulation. What we have at the moment is a non-regulated black market to which everybody has easy access, including our children, and where all the vast profit goes to organized criminals, ruthless foreign terrorists and corrupt government agencies.

    Prohibition Prevents Regulation – Legalize, Regulate & Tax!

    Reply

Add New Comment