TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 16 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Howlin wants to extend Croke Park to 2016 and make extra €1bn savings

The Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform plans to meet with public sector unions next week.

Image: Niall Carson/PA Archive/Press Association Images

PUBLIC EXPENDITURE AND Reform Minister Brendan Howlin has said that he wants to extend the Croke Park Agreement on public service pay and reform to 2016 and make an additional €1 billion in savings.

The Minister was speaking ahead of planned meetings with public sector unions next week in a bid to make further savings through measures that would include staff in the public service working longer hours for the same pay.

Other issues likely to be raised by government are increments and whether or not they should be incorporated into core pay and premium pay rates with Howlin suggesting that there be no additional pay for Saturday working.

On Newstalk’s Breakfast programme he said that “Croke Park is delivering, it’s just not enough” but he insisted that the agreement had so far delivered all that it had set out to deliver, saying that the target of €3.5 billion in net savings by 2015 is still on track.

“Since the pay bill is 35 per cent of current expenditure, that’s where we’re looking,” he told the programme saying: “What I envisage is a three year further deal that will deal with all outstanding issues.”

Howlin said that he hoped to conclude negotiations with unions by early next year in the hope of beginning to make savings towards the end of next year.

“I will be laying out my stall to the people I am negotiating with first,” he said adding that this was “courteous but prudent” as he said that “fairness will be the hallmark of what I want to do in this”.

Howlin has also said that he does not want to cut core pay for public servants or make them compulsorily redundant.

So far it is estimated that the Croke Park Agreement has saved €1.5 billion so far, including €920 million in its second year of operation from mid-2011 to mid-2012.

Yesterday: Government asks unions to attend talks on improving Croke Park savings

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (61 Comments)

  • CP2 MUST facilitate compulsory redundancies. Before the nurses, teachers and Gardaí jump all over me, it’s not for them

    It’s for the likes of Mrs Gilmore who can parachute from one McJob to another. 19 CEOs of VECs reduced to 16 and she keeps her 117k salary in a newly invented unnecessary role

    Why do we have any of these Quangos in the first place? They had 33 now theyll have 16 and the sky wont fall in why not have just 1? Or better, none. Can they not be absorbed into the dept of Education?

    Reply
    • The people at the top of the pie are pretty much all closely linked in with either Lab. FF or FG. Neither of those parties will hurt their friends, they all see the taxpayer as a means of enriching themselves and their family and friends. Better to target the plebs at the bottom that will keep voting for them either way.

      Reply
    • LeDroit 21/11/12 #

      Howlin is a former trade union official, in a party founded and funded by the trade union movement.

      So do not fret if you’re a trade union member. The Liberty Hall lads have their man in charge of ‘reform’. You’ll be fine.

      Reply
    • he looks like he is telling somebody where the dole office is .

      Reply
    • Agree with you completely. Problem is that our system has ensured that the people most affected by this change are the ones we are relying to implement it. Thats why front line staff get hit all the time. The high up, over paid, embedded public servants are not going to put their own feathered nest at risk

      Reply
  • There are so many areas they could address….. In situations (like with the reduction in VEC’s) where there are a bunch of CEO’s being moved around and accommodated elsewhere it’s a bit of a joke to not have redundancies where there isn’t a genuine need for people in another role.

    The higher paid public servants need to have their pay looked at and specifically targeted and the imbalance in pay for new entrants is just a joke. If the unions are serious about that issue, this is the time to act (but we know that’s unlikely given that their membership has relatively few new entrants).

    So obviously Howlin wants to target allowances. The thing that strikes me about allowances is that some are completely justified, some are a ridiculous name that is completely inappropriate but justified – some are appropriate names on stupid allowances.

    One thing that struck me about a previous story was that shift “allowance” was being lumped in as part of the allowance list that everyone is apparently supposed to be so annoyed about. Do we really expect to not pay people something extra for working unsocial hours as is the practice across public and private sectors? Maybe the mistake is in the name – the private sector call it “shift premium”…….

    Reply
  • Extend until 2016, how convenient. Why the short extension? Ah, I see, because that’ll get you through the next election.

    How about we see where we are when the current deal runs out, instead of extending a deal out into the unknown?

    Reply
  • Is that clown on glue, or does he take us all for a crowd of gibbering morons?!?!

    Reply
  • Believe nothing that comes out of this mans mouth, The very same tool who cut 1 allowence out of 1100, useless inept snivelling little man!

    Reply
    • Wow, said by someone appropriating the photo and name of a dead man. Classy

      Reply
    • at least i dont look like a fish you muppet!

      Reply
    • a dead man but a man that had more class in his little finger than that idiot howlin, pity he’s not around today he would have ran the little rat

      Reply
    • I’m afraid you don’t know what he would have done in this situation, but I would hope that any argument he would have wouldn’t need to use personal insults. It would nice if you could have a little bit more respect for someone that has died, rather than trying to garner some credibility from assuming his identity and arrogantly assuming what he would or would not do.

      Reply
    • I actually can comment what he would have done in this situation as we are related and his photo is in honour of the great man, Id say the lads in the pub in Tralee think your a great wit with your one liners but if thats the height of your imput try bebo or facebook, be a bit more suited to your intelligence level

      Reply
    • @Frank. He is a fool, but a fool who thinks he’s smart and that is the most dangerous type. Also, the figures mentioned as having being saved are false. The method of calculation is unbelievable and dishonest. Scrap it now and re-negotiate.

      Reply
    • Which makes it even less respectful and quite sad really. I also have dead relatives, but I wouldn’t go around putting words in their mouth. From your comment about the pub in tralee, it looks like the assumptions you make about your much admired and loved relative are extended to complete strangers as well.

      Reply
  • What a plonker

    Reply
    • Goes into a negotiation with 2 massive concessions instead of a list of demands. Does he understand which side of the table he’ll be sitting?

      Reply
    • I’m sorry, but two concessions? Oh sorry, you mean what private sector workers consider “basic pay”.
      I’m a nurse, I have 11 years of diverse experience in diverse environments. I am highly qualified, I have a masters, a PhD, I am qualified as a nurse, midwife, ANP, in surgery, ICU, and ED. I can lead an arrest, I can prescribe medication, and I can work independently of a doctor.
      Explain to me now why I should be paid the same as a nurse who has 11 years of experience, but only a general rank? Because that is the issue that is at hand here.

      Reply
    • Also, I work a minimum of 60 hours a week for which I may or may not get paid depending on the mood of the payroll department. I’ll start working for free, shall I? Would that make you happy?

      Reply
    • your can’t be a nurse, your a man aren’t you?? I’m confused….

      Reply
    • Front line services are not the issue

      Reply
    • they may not be the issue Jay, but that’s who gets the shitty end of the stick each time

      Reply
    • They are because most allowances are paid to front line workers.

      Reply
    • I get the princely sum of €10.61 extra for working a 12 hour shift on a Saturday as a frontline Paramedic. That works out at €0.88 an hour. That’ll cure the economy alright if he takes it away. I said it before, and I’ll say it again…….when are the workers and taxpayers of this country going to stand together instead of this Public/Private issue? Don’t forget, they live in their ivory towers while me and you pay for it!!

      Reply
    • @ James Connolly

      You must have been a perfect fit for Mother Teresa’s sandals then

      Reply
    • James, I never mentioned anything about increments or allowances.

      The two concessions I referred to were:
      1. Salary
      2. Compulsory Redundancies

      We can’t afford the overall pay, and voluntary redundancy by definition is not the best way to improve staff utilization – better to be able to push the small weak minority out based on performance

      As it happens, I think increments should be protected. I earn more than a junior in my line of work, as it should be as I bring more experience.

      My main point, however, was that Howlin (and by extension, the government) are going into this negotiation without the threat of paycuts and mandatory redundancies – which should very much be on the table to get the unions acting in both the interests of services and employees, instead of just trying to protecting salary and conditions. By keeping this negotiating position, an agreement can be drawn up with definitive consequences.

      Reply
    • Mursh 21/11/12 #

      #John the baptist: Is that your default nurse joke?

      Reply
    • The reason they will never ever stand together because the public sector think their entitled to the wage regardless of economic climate and by public sector i mean everyon ie politicians right the way down before the nurse and firemen start the rants off

      Reply
  • Proof if any were needes that Labour is a proxy for the public sector unions. We pay our university lecturers and librarians more than President Obama which is ludicrous.

    Reply
    • Mursh 21/11/12 #

      I know, it’s crazy what Obama gets paid. Imagine spending $852,900,000 to get a $400,000 a year job for four years.

      Obama bla bla bla. What he get’s paid has SFA to do with anything.

      Reply
  • only a billion in savings?

    That means the bulk of the savings and tax increases will still come from the private sector and low income families.

    Shame on this government.

    Reply
  • They definitely know what there are doing. It’s the decisiveness that impresses me the most.

    Reply
  • So the haters still hate …

    Reply
  • The entitelment brigade will be rubbing their hands together now

    typical labour only interested in getting voted in next term rater than tackling the issues now like actual concerned politicians

    Reply
  • Scrap it now, have the strikes, face down the unions. Let the union officials be exposed through public debate as they try to defend the indefensible. Come out the other side leaner and fit to deliver services to the paying public…

    Reply
  • G 21/11/12 #

    Is this to save the 1billion we were supposed to save in the first croke park deal? It’s obvious the public service are dragging this out as long as possible hoping the country will return to prosperity and they will be forgotten and left to return to their old ways.
    It looks to me like the only saving made so far have been by retiring people on gilt edge pensions (not sure it is even a saving as they fiddle the figures) and cutting or charging more for front line services where the general public pick up the tab.
    They should have all been made redundant three years ago with the better ones rehired on new and more affordable contracts. We would have been over the hassle by now and could have saved about 10 billion without effecting services.

    Reply
  • Government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit and security of the people, nation or community; whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community have an indubitable, unalienable, indefeasible right, to reform, alter, or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public

    Reply
  • Scrap it and save 3 times as much Minister Howler. Minister for Laziness and status quo.

    Reply
  • Ahh sure give them all a pay rise just to stay in the crime park agreement . You might as well . banana republic

    Reply
  • Emmet 21/11/12 #

    General Election due around then is it?? He’s an absolute disgrace and should be sacked as he has failed as a minister… Probably a really nice guy but inept sadly.

    Reply
  • But shur Croke Park already holds 82300?

    Reply
  • Scrap the agreement – reverse – get realistic. Create jobs and stop emigration!

    Reply
  • If they extend it long enough it’ll start bringing in money.

    Reply
  • Hey Lads, I just thought of a great idea…….How about we sack all the public servants and replace them from the dole thereby solving the public servant and unemployment issue in one go.

    Reply
  • All of this is the governments fault of course. They voted themselves in.

    Reply
    • No we voted for them based on their manifestos which got thrown out when they got in.Government is supposed to work for all of society not just one protected sector,or am i missing something?

      Reply

Add New Comment