Welcome to our Public Beta Site - What does this mean?
Dublin: 12 °C Wednesday 22 February, 2012

ECJ asked to rule on mandatory retention of phone and internet data

Image: renatomitra via Flickr

THE HIGH COURT has asked the European Court of Justice to rule on the extent to which Ireland can require telecommunications providers to retain data about how people use its services.

The court has made a preliminary reference to the ECJ asking whether an EU directive – which requires member states to retain details of mobile phone calls, internet and email usage – respects the rights of the user.

Justice Liam McKechnie has also asked the ECJ to offer guidance on whether national legislation implementing an EU directive must also comply with the European Convention on Human Rights if it is to be fully compatible with EU law.

The second matter could have a significant impact throughout the EU – and require member states throughout the 27-member bloc to revise laws implementing EU directives in case they may form a breach of a person’s human rights.

Laws which form a breach of the European Convention on Human Rights can be appealed to the European Court of Human Rights, a non-EU institution – and potentially result in countries being ordered to change their laws, as was the case in A, B and C versus Ireland on abortion rights.

Data retention

The High Court’s referrals to the ECJ stem from a case brought by Digital Rights Ireland against the Minister for Communications and others, querying the circumstances under which the State can ask telecommunications companies to retain information about how customers use their services.

The Communications (Retention of Data) Act 2011, which gives effect to an EU directive from 2006, requires telecoms companies and internet providers to retain information about the usage of a person’s phone and data connection for some time after it occurs.

Logs of phone and mobile phone traffic data must be retained for two years, while logs of internet usage must be retained for one year. The Act does not require the companies to retain the actual data itself, merely logs of the traffic.

Digital Rights Ireland argues that the legislation restricts individual privacy.

The Irish government had previously challenged the directive with the ECJ, asking it to be annulled on the basis that it had not been appropriately adopted. Ireland and Slovakia had voted against the adoption of the directive at the European Council in 2006.

Dáil to discuss proposed ‘Irish SOPA’ legislation next Tuesday

Poland signs ACTA copyright treaty amid protests

Already a fan? Complete your signup...

Get breaking news from The Journal.ie via Facebook. Just click 'Like'.

Read Next:

Comments (12 Comments)

  • Begrudgy 26 days ago #
    Report this comment

    WTF is going on lately. More of this rubbish.

    Reply
  • Stephen Walsh 26 days ago #
    Report this comment

    Sadly our basic freedoms are being undermined and abused. There is no need to retain the data. Just another example of this Orwellian Big Brother mindset. I’m glad the Irish Govt. Challenged the laws -

    Reply
    • Karl Doyle 26 days ago #
      Report this comment

      The govt didn’t , the court did. Basically our high court took action against our government.

    • Report this comment

      The same government that convinced us that cutting their pay was a good idea. They’re not just a fat bunch of overpaid wig-wearing eejits you know. Judicial activism, in small doses, is a necessity for democracy.

  • Aydo 26 days ago #
    Report this comment

    I’m telling ya, they saw the Internet used to overthrow a political powers and organise meetings and marches and it terrified them. Now they are locking it up.

    Reply
  • Dave 26 days ago #
    Report this comment

    They have absolutely no right to this information – plain and simple.

    Reply
  • Antoin O Lachtnain 26 days ago #
    Report this comment

    Digital Rights Ireland (of which I am a director) brought the challenge. The government vigorously opposed the challenge.

    Reply
  • B7584 26 days ago #
    Report this comment

    :D really,this country & the eu can go f**k themselves.

    Next few months are going to be scary in terms of technology & privacy etc.

    Reply
  • Alan Vickery 26 days ago #
    Report this comment

    More of the same crap from the top. They want total control. In the USA a person has a right to bear arms. Not for personal protection, it’s to ensure the government can never hold all the power. I think we need some of that here.

    Reply
  • jimbo 26 days ago #
    Report this comment

    feck off

    Reply
  • Rory 25 days ago #
    Report this comment

    “…does not require the companies to retain the actual data itself…”

    Good lord, imagine!

    Reply

Add New Comment