TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

Israeli Prime Minister calls for early elections

The date for the election is likely to be set next week when the parliament reconvenes for its winter session.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaking at a press conference in Jerusalem yesterday.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaking at a press conference in Jerusalem yesterday.
Image: Bernat Armangue/AP/Press Association Images

ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER Benjamin Netanyahu began his re-election bid today after calling snap polls that he is tipped to win, presenting himself as the only hope of facing Iran and the global economic crisis.

Following his announcement late yesterday that the election was to be brought forward, Netanyahu fired the unofficial starting gun to a campaign expected to see Israelis go to the polls in January or February.

The move ended weeks of speculation about whether he would call an early vote in order to capitalise on his popularity, with newspapers unanimous that Netanyahu was in the enviable position of being the only realistic contender.

“The election campaign begins with Netanyahu being perceived as the only one who fills the prime minister’s seat naturally,” wrote Nahum Barnea in the top-selling Yediot Aharonot daily in a piece headlined: “The Usual Candidate.”

Although Netanyahu gave no date for the election, which had been due in October 2013, most commentators suggested the vote was likely to take place on either January 22 or 29.

The date is likely to be set next week when the Knesset, or parliament, reconvenes for its winter session.

National interest

“My duty as prime minister is to put the national interest before everything, and so I’ve decided that for the good of Israel we must go to an election now as quickly as possible,” Netanyahu said yesterday.

Barnea said with no realistic opponent in the field, and the outcome largely known to both politicians and voters alike, parties would focus attention on the only variable — the make-up of the next coalition government.

“In terms of Israeli democracy, this is an unfortunate reality. Many voters feel that not only is there no one to vote for, there is no one to vote against: Everyone (except for the Meretz) dreams of serving in the next Netanyahu government,” he said, referring to a leftwing party.

Writing in the left-leaning Haaretz newspaper, commentator Ari Shavit said Netanyahu’s policy of doing little had served him well.

Stability

“All he offered Israelis was stability: security stability, economic stability and political stability. But since Israel is surrounded by the stormy world economy and stormy Arab world, Netanyahu’s make-no-progress stability turned into a political gold mine,” he wrote.

“It allowed its leader to take no real steps and score no real achievement, and turned him into what seems today to be virtually the sole candidate to head the government of Israel.”

Netanyahu said the move to bring forward the election was sparked by a coalition deadlock over the 2013 budget, which includes a fresh series of harsh austerity measures.

In his address, Netanyahu was quick to burnish his government’s security and economic credentials, presenting himself as the only guarantee in the face of the threat posed by Iran’s nuclear programme, regional insecurity sparked by the Arab Spring, and the economic crisis.

Austerity

Opinion polls indicate Netanyahu, who heads the rightwing Likud party, is well placed to stay in power, although his ratings hit a low point earlier this year after he pushed through an initial series of austerity measures.

The measures, which came on the back of mass protests over the rising cost of living, sparked public anger and saw Netanyahu’s popularity slump to its lowest level since he came to power in March 2009, with 60 percent saying they were unhappy with his performance.

But according to a poll published in Haaretz at the end of September, Netanyhau’s popularity has recovered from its summer low.

Likud, along with the other rightwing and ultra-Orthodox parties, would take 66 of the 120 seats in parliament if the election were held immediately, the poll found.

By comparison, the centre-left bloc would take only 54 votes in any general election.

Netanyahu’s existing coalition, which groups rightwing, nationalist and ultra-Orthodox parties along with the centre-right Independence party led by Defence Minister Ehud Barak, currently holds 66 seats.

Read: Israeli embassy security incident in Dublin confirmed as false alarm>

Read next:

Comments (63 Comments)

  • Better get the election out of the way; it’s easier to start a war with Iran after elections the before, I guess.

    Reply
    • I’d say it’s better to start a war before an elections as:
      A) you can’t be sure you’d still be in power after the election to start the war
      and
      B) people tend to vote for the current gov when at war…

      Reply
    • @SaintRuth:
      I strongly disagree with that:
      A) He wouldn’t go for election of his postion wasn’t strong enough for him to stay in power.
      b) Having an election when the bodies fly in isn’t exactly a great thing to get re-elected on.

      Reply
  • I’m sure that the next child that in mutilated by white phosphorus or the next homeowner whose house is flattened will appreciate that it was done by a democratically elected Government.

    Reply
    • If there was no terrorism, there would be no reason for Israel to retaliate. Unfortunately, in a war innocent people get hurt.
      I am sure you would support the ending of Palestinian terror wouldn’t you, Brian?

      Reply
    • Michelle, are you REALLY excusing the use of white phosphorous in a built up area….a war crime….with the excuse ‘in a war innocent people get hurt’??

      Reply
    • Michelle, all acts of terror whether state or non-state should be condemned. Using white phosphorus is a war crime under the chemical weapons treaty and bulldozing a families home so that an illegal settlement can be built is also a crime.

      Reply
    • @werejammin the use of white phosphorous in a battle situation is not a war crime. If terrorists are launching rockets into Israel it has the absolute right to respond and defend itself. If the same terrorists ambush IDF soldiers from a built up area again they have the right to defend themselves from attack. Battles are won by using superior tactics and overwhelming firepower. I don’t hear anyone condemning Islamic Jihad or Hamas for targetting Israeli civilians. Your double standards speak volumes for your attitude. The use of the phrase “war crime” is a red herring and you know it. Your time would be better spent organising a humanitarian flotilla for the people of Syria who are suffering from real agression.

      Reply
    • Just for the record
      Israel used White Phosphorus against HAMAS targets in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead in January 2009. This violated no international laws or conventions http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/wp.htm

      Reply
    • Put that in your pipe and smoke it :)

      Reply
    • http://www.hrw.org/news/2009/03/25/israel-white-phosphorus-use-evidence-war-crimes

      You can use WP in open areas as a screen but dropping it in heavily populated areas with civilians is a crime.

      Reply
    • @Brian you are getting a bit confused, it is not a crime just because HRW or Hamas say it is. Human rights watch is alleging it may be evidence of a crime. WP was used in Gaza to screen troop movements. It would be a crime if WP was used to deliberately target civilians and this is not the case. Now HRW were not in command of troops on the ground in Gaza so they are basing their report on one-sided evidence, and this is stated in the full report, there are two sides to every story. They did not have access to any battlefield report so their report is flawed. The two words used “war crime” is very emotive in this case and is being misused here.

      Reply
    • Actualy Andy, white phosphorous usage is banned in populated areas whether used for troop movement OR as a weapon, because the devastating effect is the same no matter what the claimed usage.

      Kinda like fishing with dynamite knowing that theres a few hundred people scuba diving under your boat. You can claim your intent was to catch fish, but you’re still liable for the deaths and injuries.

      http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/news/israeli-armys-use-white-phosphorus-gaza-clear-undeniable-20090119

      “White phosphorus is a weapon intended to provide a smokescreen for troop movements on the battlefield,” said Cobb-Smith. “It is highly incendiary, air burst and its spread effect is such that it that should never be used on civilian areas.”

      Donatella Rovera, Amnesty’s researcher on Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories said that such extensive use of this weapon in Gaza’s densely populated residential neighbourhoods is inherently indiscriminate. “Its repeated use in this manner, despite evidence of its indiscriminate effects and its toll on civilians, is a war crime,” she said………In another incident on the same day a white phosphorus shell landed in the al-Quds hospital in Gaza City also causing a fire that forced hospital staff to evacuate the patients.

      Reply
    • @werejammin Your analogy is deeply flawed. The military commanders 1st priority is the safety of his own troops while moving they must be screened from the view of the enemy and protected from fire as they are moving in open country. Now the commander can also use an overwhelming artillery or air strike to suppress the enemy that would cause serious civilian casualties. He has nothing to gain from harming innocent civilians and everything to lose.
      To quote your post from Cobb-Smith on the use of WP he states it “should never be used on civilian areas.” The key word is should. He does not say it cannot be used. The other people are expressing opinions and as I quoted earlier they are using evidence supplied by Hamas.
      Ask yourself who benefits if civilians are put in the firing line? Hamas and its proxies are the only ones who benefits from the situation. This has nothing to do with fishing and swimmers. You can throw up all the wishy washy opinions from whoever you want – opinions are opinions it still does not make it a war crime. War is a serious business. There would be no need for the operation in the first place if Hamas ceased firing rockets at Israeli civilians. Now HAMAS deliberately target civilians –kids at McDonnell’s, schoolchildren on buses. They use mentally vulnerable adults as their proxy bombers to target and kill and main innocent civilians. Is that not a war crime?
      I do not hear any condemnation of their actions. Why?

      Reply
    • So its ok to commit a war crime against innocent women and children to protect your own troops?

      To paraphrase little britain…..(despite your little keyboard warrior rant)

      Geneva convention says no.

      Reply
    • @werjammin So its ok to commit a war crime against innocent women and children to protect your own troops?
      You are obviously having problems with comprehension, where in my argument did I state it was OK?
      Using your type of argument and jumping to conclusions then you are condoning attacks on innocent Israeli women and children.
      The Geneva Conventions are a comprehensive list of rules for belligerents they do not state yes or no.
      As for the keyboard warrior rant who is the one replying to posts in the late hours hiding their real name and ID? Not me. so this particular label (keyboard warrior) rests more comfortably around your neck. I live in the real world; where as you, live and hide in your cyber fantasy world with your Xbox and PS3 and laptop.
      In future you should reserve your comments to posts on fishing and Little Britain because as you have shown us that is where your real expertise lies.
      END OF REAL MESSAGE……………….

      Reply
  • @Jan Its a free and democratic world we live in. Until that changes we are free to comment on what we want, as are you. Or maybe you are one of those who prefer a world ruled by religous fundamentalists. Who despise free expression.

    Reply
    • Oh my goodness, Andy, do you think that little tiny me would try shut up your free (hate) speech in your country? Duh no. You give me too much credit, but of course you words are just an act, and a show to pretend that little Jan could dent your ego. Still Israel is mine and you don’t have a say. Israel is not your. Israel is not for the Arabs. But hey if I tell you to give half of Ireland to the Arabs, you would scream and say Ireland is not my business either, right? Of course right!:-)

      Reply
  • Elections, even ‘free elections’ do not equate to democracy. Democracy is also judged by the treatment of minorities. Israel is democratic in the same way as the Northern state was before Direct Rule- not very!

    Reply
  • As Diana Buttu said recently, Israel is a democracy for its Jewish citizens, and a Jewish state for its Arab citizens.

    Reply
  • If Arabs want to vote in this election they have to sell their soul and take up Israeli citizenship.

    Reply
    • You mean the Israeli Arabs who are born Israeli citizens and have repeatedly chosen to fight for Israel by any chance Eamonn?

      Reply
    • David there is a minute amount of Arabs in the IDF and they are seen as traitors by their own people.

      Reply
    • David The Arabs of the Negev have served in the IDF in large numbers and their thanks has been the expulsion of 80,000 of them by the Israeli govt, as revealed on a documentary on RTE a few years ago presented by a former Israeli news anchor. The Israeli Land Agency has been running ads scaremongering about the Arab birth-rates in the region to get Israeli Jews to move there, This is an Apartheid State. Also if Arabs do not apply for ISraeli citizenship they are liable to have their house demolished as those in East Jerusalem are discovering.

      Reply
    • And yet they still chose to serve, remind me Brian, how how many jews are their in Hamas?
      You say they are considered race traitors by their own people but how quick would you be to use the fact that some jews speak out against Israel as evidence that anti-zionism is not anti-semitic?
      Out of curiosity, do you believe that the majority of arabs are justified in considering other arabs who have served in the IDF as traitors.

      Reply
    • Wait, Brian is telling me that only a minute amount of arabs have served in the IDF while Eamonn is telling me they served in large numbers, which one is it?

      Reply
    • By law Palestinians who hold Israeli citizenship do not have to do military service and the vast majority don’t do it. Some Bedouin and Druze do serve in the IDF; this might be where confusion arises.

      Reply
    • I’m well aware of that Petr, but we were talking about the arab community in Israel, not the Israeli Palestinians or the Israeli Druze both of which groups do not consider themselves arabs, so stop trying to excuse Brian and Eamonn’s attempts to use what every version of the truth best serves their demonization of all Israelis.
      I notice you made no comment on Brian’s use of the dangerous idea of category traitors, I take it then you’d have not problem with someone calling anti-Israeli jews traitors as you have no complant against arabs who label other arabs who have served in the IDF traitors then?

      Reply
    • I’m well aware of that Petr

      With all due respect, I don’t think you are. The following is just not factually correct:

      we were talking about the arab community in Israel, not the Israeli Palestinians or the Israeli Druze both of which groups do not consider themselves arabs

      The Arabs in Israeli (AKA Israeli Arabs, which is a label many of the group in question object to yet is widely used) and Israeli Palestinians (also a controversial label) are one and the same. Also, they do indeed consider themselves Arabs… because they are Arabs!

      so stop trying to excuse Brian and Eamonn’s attempts to use what every version of the truth best serves their demonization of all Israelis

      Get over yourself, David. I was merely clarifying the facts. It was needed to as you seem to be quite confused on the basics.

      I notice you made no comment on Brian’s use of the dangerous idea of category traitors, I take it then you’d have not problem with someone calling anti-Israeli jews traitors as you have no complant against arabs who label other arabs who have served in the IDF traitors then?

      Ah, I didn’t realise that’s how it works. If I don’t make mention of something or other then you get to assume whatever you like. Of course you have form on this tactic; insinuating, as you did last night, that I’d approve of a young girl being brutally shot. It’s a dirty little trick, David. You really shouldn’t do it.

      Reply
    • So rather then clarifying his opinion and putting to bed any insinuation, real or imagined, I may have made about you, you chose, yet again to avoid the question and launch a personal attack on me for simply asking you to clarify your views.

      Struck something of a nerve have I?

      Petr, get over yourself, put your personal problems with anyone who does not agree with you, stay on topic and play the ball, not the man.

      Reply
  • The term of Mahmoud Abbas – the Palestinian “Prime Minister” – finished about 4 years ago.
    Yet, the western world still regards him as a legitimate leader. Why?

    Reply
  • At least they have elections in Israel

    Reply
  • What Do We Do? What Do We Say?
    by Jan (Shoshanna) Dolash
    ——————————–

    What do we do? What do we say?
    For they will rage at us anyway!
    Do we cower? Do we evade them?
    No we can do nothing but frustrate their attempts!
    We sit in the glare of every nation.
    Their only desire is for our relocation.
    No! We will not relent to their demand!
    For placing Israel up for sale is against HaShem’s command!

    So what do we do, and what do we say?
    Eretz Ysrael stands and with one voice says, “WE ARE HERE TO STAY!”

    Reply
  • Dear Haters of Israel/Lovers of “Palestinians!

    I, Israel, would like to issue an apology to all of you. It’s an apology that I know you would demand of me to offer, and though I write this to you, still I will continue on as before I issued it.

    1. I am first of all very sorry that
    G-D gave me this land!
    2. I am very sorry that the Arabs hate me, and demand the land for themselves.
    3. I am sorry that you condone terrorism against me by the poor victimized “Palestinians,” even though they are not victimized by us but their own Arab leaders!
    4. I am also sorry for your suicide bombers having to be torn into shreds so that you could kill innocent men, women, and children!
    5. I am sorry that the IDF greatly anger you, because are sworn to guard and protect our borders from invaders, murderers, and terrorists!
    6. I am very sorry that those who hate me would actually applaud Hitler for killing 6 million if my own rightful inhabitants!
    7. I am sorry that you covet to the death my position with the true
    G-D of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob!
    8. I am sorry that one day, my people will retake the Temple Mount, and bring your filthy golden dome of doom to ashes and rubble to the ground!
    9. Finally, I am most of all very sorry that my points were all lies, for truly what you demand of my people is an utter impossibility!!

    I OWE YOU NO APOLOGY!!

    Reply
  • Mr Netanyahu’s Govt has created 330,000 new jobs in the last 4 years.in a global crash..If in Ireland this would translate into 165,000 new jobs ..whereas we all know..Ireland has lost 300,000 jobs in the last 4 years..Netanyahu will be returned easily…Israel is a safe anchor in the storm that currently swirls in the Middle East

    Reply
  • Ireland and all its political unrest… yet still you all here sit giving comments to what has NEVER been your business: Israeli politics! Mind your business!

    Reply
    • If a wiseman (STEPHEN) has an argument with a fool (JAN), the fool (JAN) only rages and laughs and there is no quiet.”
      My pearls are too precious to swine, and wisdom is too foolish for the fool. So amen to moving on…:-)

      Reply
    • Stephen, you posted your reply here instead of where I posted the Proverb. Ha ha!:-) one can twist anything to suit their own self so that they end up the wiseman, right, but remember if you truly want to know and apply this Proverb, you then have to place in the context of the Torah of the Jews. This Proverb compliments the one who walks according to the Torah of G-D, and of course u are a hater of the Jews and of their G-d. So in essence, you the fool, it is. Yet to be a fool in your eyes is a good place for me to be.:-)

      Reply

Add New Comment