TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

Workers to meet union after Dublin company cuts 83 jobs

Distribution firm Johnson Brothers told its employees yesterday that 83 jobs will be lost due at its plant in west Dublin due to outsourcing.

Image: Screengrab via Johnson Brothers website

TRADE UNION SIPTU is to meet with workers and management at a Dublin company which unexpectedly announced yesterday that it is to cut 83 jobs.

Distribution firm Johnson Brothers called the employees at its west Dublin plant into a meeting yesterday afternoon to inform them that the jobs will be lost in its warehouse and transport operations due to outsourcing.

The trade union said the announcement had come as a shock to workers.

An organiser for SIPTU said it will look for alternative options for staff during the 30 day negotiation period during which no notice of redundancy can be served on employees.

“During this period, SIPTU will seek to explore all options for staff,” said Graham Macken. “These include redeployment within the company, possible employment by DHL, the company to which distribution work at Johnson Brothers is being outsourced, and, where necessary, acceptable redundancy terms for staff”.

The remaining 200 staff at the company will not be affected by the announcement.

The company is a logistics, distribution and sales provider based in Ballymount in Dublin. It has been in operation since 1893.

Previously: Distribution firm Johnson Brothers to cut 83 jobs in Dublin >

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (10 Comments)

  • MVM 05/01/13 #

    That’s why the government needs business people in power having a primary teacher running the country is laughable..

    Reply
  • Johnson Brothers is a disgracefully run company. My dad worked for them for 32 years until 2010 when he was called into the office on a lie when he was on holidays and they told him and 20 others that they would be made redundant. They then hired a few younger salesmen in their place so needless to say they lost when they were brought to the labour court. This article just shows to me that they are still at this disgraceful carry on

    Reply
  • What a stupid thing to say, what can Enda Kenny do about them outsourcing some of the business? It’s just another anti government rant. Engage the little backward thing in your head before you get on the keyboard.

    Reply
    • another firm going for the cheap labour option

      Reply
    • Pat
      Private Sector employment is not a form of Social Welfare. If a Company can maximise profits without employees that is their right and entitlement. So long as they operate within the law it is perfectly reasonable for a Company to restructure their business as they see fit.

      Reply
    • A business is there to make profit, what they deem to be a suitable figure is entirely up those placed in charge as they have to answer to the shareholders.

      If the government was run in this fashion we’d be long out of this financial situation but instead they’ve been held hostage by unions and their ilk.

      Reply
    • If Dhl is able to carry out this work with less staff and for a lower rate means that there was obvious waste in the warehouse and logistics side of the business.

      Can’t blame a company for seeking a more efficient way to deliver it goods. This is what free enterprise and the private sector is all about.

      Reply
  • Dr.fury 05/01/13 #

    Wow there are some distribution company,goin a bit too far though distributing there bleedin Irish staff,hope they get proper redundancy and not the shameful state crap

    Reply
  • In operation since 1893 ??….surely that should be 1993.

    Reply

Add New Comment