TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

Just 30 per cent of Irish people ‘understand basic finance concepts’

We may no longer need to know “what a tracker mortgage is”, but how does our personal finance knowledge stack up overall?

Image: Sasko Lazarov/Photocall Ireland

THERE ARE ‘CLEAR gaps’ in Irish people’s understanding of basic personal finance issues, a new survey suggests.

The Irish Association of Pension Funds (IAPF), which commissioned the Red C Research survey, said it identified “clear gaps in the Irish public’s understanding of basic personal finance issues”.

Participants were asked three questions and in total just three in ten (31 per cent) Irish adults answered all the questions correctly while 53 per cent answered two of the questions correctly.

Survey

Ireland didn’t fare well when compared with our worldwide counterparts, with the country’s results being described as “noticeably below average” on most measures.

Our result contrasts with 53 per cent of Germans getting all questions correct and Japanese and American participants scoring slightly poorer than the Irish at just 27 per cent and 30 per cent respectively.

Following the findings, the IAPF has called on Government to provide a greater level of financial education in Irish schools, particularly at 2nd level.

According to Jerry Moriarty, Director of Policy with the IAPF, consumers have had to address significant personal finance problems in recent times.

Simply put – having an enhanced understanding would lead to better decision-making. While first-time buyers may no longer need to “know what a tracker mortgage is” as they are no longer available, there are plenty of other aspects of household financial planning that people encounter on a daily basis. With mortgages the biggest commitment people will take on and pensions the biggest asset they will have, it is crucial that people know how inflation, interest rates and diversification of investments can impact their financial security.

The Questions

Participants were asked whether they would have more or less than €102 after five years assuming they lodged €100 at the start in a savings account at an annual interest rate of 2 per cent.

Approximately seven in 10 (69 per cent) of Irish adults correctly answered this question, with 28 per cent getting it wrong.  In the Netherlands and Germany, 85 per cent and 82 per cent of people respectively got the correct answer. Only the USA fared worse with 65 per cent getting it right.

The participants were then asked to assume that the interest rate on their savings account was 1 per cent per year and the inflation was 2 per cent per year. They were then asked after saving for 1 year, with the money in this account, would they be able to buy more than today, exactly the same as today, or less than today?

Three quarters (76 per cent) of Irish adults correctly answered this question which was pretty close to the best – the Germans at 78 per cent.

Finally they were asked: Whether buying a single company stock or a unitised fund usually provides a safer return.

Just over half (56 per cent) of Irish adults correctly answered this question with almost 1/5 (19 per cent) not understanding it.

This was the toughest question and again only the Germans bettered us at 62 per cent, with only 40 per cent of the Japanese getting it right.

Gender

Jerry Moriarty said that Irish males appear to be more financially literate than their female, as in question one, 75 per cent of men answered correctly compared with 63 per cent of women.

Similarly questions 2 and 3 (respectively) signalled the same trend with 81 per cent of men to 70 per cent of women and 59 per cent of men to 52 per cent of women answering correctly.

The IAPF research also found that overall, age is a positive factor with older people doing well and scoring substantially better than those that still attend or have just left our education system.

When contrasted, the various socio-economic groups showed little differences.

Read: Credit card debt down – but average card still over €1,300 in debt>

Read next:

Comments (39 Comments)

  • I think that when these surveys are released – instead of using them for the Headline, maybe include the total number of people surveyed, where, during what times,

    Reply
  • Just 30 per cent of government TD’s ‘understand basic finance concepts’

    Reply
  • Can you include the answers? Thanks!

    Reply
  • Just 30 per cent of Irish people understand basic finance. Well, that explains the Bubble, the banks, the bank bailout, NAMA, government ‘stimulus’ policies, Croke Farce Agreement,.. Are most of the 30 percent likely to be in politics?

    Reply
  • I’m no Financial genius but this must be why our government gets paid such high wages. France’s new government has agreed to take a 30% pay cut so they must be vastly inferior in financial know how to our government. I feel so lucky now. Let’s all vote Yes so they can keep their high wages and not need to worry about having to come up with imaginative ideas to create growth. I’m so glad I voted for Labour so they can tell us all what a great job FG are doing. Enda must be so busy putting up posters himself to keep costs down that he can’t go on the TV or radio to spread his messages of joy and hope.

    Reply
  • Personally, I wouldn’t consider “buying a single company stock or a unitised fund” as basic personal finance. That’s gambling, pure & simple. They may as well have asked what the return on a Yankee in the bookies would be!

    Reply
  • Where did they get these imbeciles for this survey? This is all very basic stuff. Can these people also not shop? Not use a bank account?

    Reply
    • They are not imbeciles, this basic stuff isn’t taught in schools unless you take an optional business or economics subject.

      It’s illiteracy, not stupidity, and not surprising to hear. People don’t know what bondholders are, what austerity actually means etc, and they lash them out in everyday speech in ways that make no sense whatsoever.

      Reply
    • alan 17/05/12 #

      and yet people are expected to (and will) will vote on the Fiscal Treaty

      so, given that there is such a poor understanding of what is involved what exaclty are people voting for?

      Reply
    • alan
      People know EXACTLY , what they will be voting for . That is why people will be voting NO.
      Vote NO against bullyboy tactics being used and encouraged by the government.
      VoteNO to austerity,and cuts and poverty.
      Vote NO to bailing out fat cat bankers and crooked retired politicians.
      Vote NO to unemployment and lack of real efforts to creaate real jobs.
      Vote NO to reductions in our health services
      Vote NO to Less Special Needs teachers
      Vote NO to cuts in Social Welfare
      VOTE NO .

      Reply
    • When did they stop teaching this in school? The last one maybe not but the other two were taught in primary school. I’m in my 30s is the school system that different now?
      Being financially illiterate is a choice not to informs ones self. Unless you are actually illiterate but that is not 70% of the population

      Reply
    • You’re spot on Alan. It should not have gone to referendum. This should have gone straight into law after dail and seanad debate. The commission as usual came back with answer of I Don’t Know on whether it needed a referendum.

      Susie gives the prime examples above of financial illiteracy.

      There are many actual reasons to vote no, but what Susie has listed are not any of them I’m afraid. There isn’t so much as a sentence in the treaty about any of that stuff.

      Reply
    • @P Wurple. People don’t know what bondholders are or what austerity means. Yet they support economic policies that introduce austerity and give cover for bondholders.

      Reply
    • Ok P Wurple . SO where do you suggest that we get the EXTRA 6 billion euros on top of the cuts we are already suffering if cuts are not made when this government get a second bailout which is increasingly more likely if we vote yes…Article 3 Re 0.5% deficit limit. See article 3,1, e,the automatic correction mechanism and article 3,2 binding force and permanent character,preferably constitutional….Article 5 . bringing in outsiders unelected to monitor the budgets after the deficit is achieved as is vey likely. Article 8,1 answerable to the court of justice re considered failures by another party…. Article 4 60% gdp.we had that at the height of the tiger , hardly possible again for a long long time . I Nam no economist ,but I am not ignorant as you imply. With all of this of course there will be massive cuts in services . We need GROWTH not taxes / cuts.

      Reply
    • Aoife Barry 17/05/12 #

      Hi Susie, P Wurple and Alan – this particular article is not about the Referendum, so Referendum-related comments are off-topic.
      Thanks
      Aoife

      Reply
    • P Wurple 17/05/12 #

      There’s no response I could make to that gibberish anyway, so we’re sorted I’d say Aoife. :)

      Reply
    • Oops , so sorry people , i imagine it is all connected some how , but if you say so Aoife , I will stand corrected :) :)
      It is ridiculous to say that people are ignorant of basic finance concepts. If you can add and subtract and pay your bills, or realise you can’t pay them , then you understand basic finance concepts .

      Reply
    • Ha ha Peeee Wurple . That’s nice !

      Reply
  • In our defence, we have started Financial Maths as part of the new Leaving Cert maths course. Wait a second, is this what pro-activity feels like?

    Reply
  • This theory is proven a lot right here in The Journals comments.

    Reply
  • What political parties are talking about when people vote for them is a hell of a lot different to what they’re talking about after people vote for them. Most of them change their tune quicker than Ian Dempsey on speed.

    Reply
  • mattoid 17/05/12 #

    “I don’t know what a tracker morgage is…..”
    (actually I do and I’m damn glad to be on one).

    Reply
  • Doesn’t surprise me at all, economics should be made mandatory for the leaving cert so people can actually understand what political parties are talking about when they vote for them.

    Reply
    • Wouldn’t make any difference Kieran, the governments of europe don’t even follow basic economic rules,
      Thats the problem, banks shouldn’t be saved, countries shouldn’t be rescued.
      It all defies economics

      Reply
  • Jesus Christ, how can you judge whether it not an entire nation has a basic grasp of basic financial matters with only three questions??

    Reply
  • Danny D 17/05/12 #

    Home economics should teach of finances from very young age, instead of selection of washing powders…

    Reply
  • Aurfur 17/05/12 #

    Even the most financially illiterate person knows that you cant spend more than you have coming in, without financial disaster that is.

    Reply
  • Sure aren’t the Referendum Commission running concise radio adverts to educate the Nation on such complex matters? I think we need to take that poll again…

    Reply
  • Neiloooo 17/05/12 #

    Yes clearly the fact that every 7 out of 10 euros in the public sector is spent on wages shows how lacking the irish public is in financial concepts… Now wheres my banner to complain about poor facilities

    Reply
  • cimada 17/05/12 #

    Ah man argue argue argue. Let’s just listen to some music.

    Reply
  • Wonder what was the answer to the third one. I didn’t even understand the question!

    Reply

Add New Comment