TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Liberian President defends anti-homosexual law

The Nobel Peace Prize winner says she will not challenge laws criminalising homosexual acts – saying certain “traditional values” should be preserved.

Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf
Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf
Image: Rebecca Blackwell/AP/Press Association Images

THE PRESIDENT OF Liberia and Nobel Peace Prize winner Ellen Johnson Sirleaf has defended the criminalisation of homosexual acts in the country, saying that certain “traditional values” should be preserved.

During a joint interview with Tony Blair, who was acting in his role as the founder of the Africa Governance Initiative (AGI), Sirleaf told the Guardian: “We like ourselves just the way we are.”

“Voluntary sodomy” is classed as a misdemeanour in Liberia and is currently punishable by up to one year in prison. However, new proposals to impose stronger punishments have recently been put forward.

One proposal would make a person guilty of a second-degree felony – and would carry a prison sentence of up to five years - if they “seduce, encourage or promote” a person of the same gender to engage in sexual activities or “purposefully engages in acts that arouse or tend to arouse another person of the same gender to have sexual intercourse”.

Another bill would make gay marriage a crime – and those found to be in violation of the law would face up to 10 years in jail.

During his time as the UK’s Prime Minister, Blair championed the rights of gay people. However, he refused to comment on Sirleaf’s remarks, saying: “One of the advantages of doing what I do now is I can choose the issues I get into and the issues I don’t.”

He added that the priorities of the AGI were power, roads and jobs delivery.

Read next:

Comments (37 Comments)

  • In 2011 the President of Liberia, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, was awarded the Nobel Prize for Peace “for her non-violent struggle for the safety of women and for women’s rights to full participation in peace-building work.” Today she is defending her laws criminalising homosexuality in Liberia. This woman should be stripped of her Nobel prize for PEACE! The hint is in the title. Where is the peace in defending the criminialisation of the way somebody is born? Should the Nobel Committee not see fit to issue a statement concerning her comments? The very fact that she expounds such medieval beliefs reflects directly on the Nobel foundation and any silence its your behalf would therefore by extension be a reflection on the Nobel Foundation as a whole. Interestingly Thorbjørn Jagland the Secretary General of the Council of Europe, the Human Rights organisation in Strasbourg, is also the Chair of the Nobel Committee.

    Reply
  • Perhaps she should be stripped of the prize. Her words alone are a violation of human rights. Shame on her.

    Reply
  • why is it so hard to respect an individual sexuality…if some1 want to be gay or lesbien,whats the big deal

    Reply
    • The way your comment reads is as though you think people choose to be gay. No one chooses their sexuality, they are born that way. Can you tell me of anyone who decided to be straight or gay?

      Reply
    • I choose to be straight, that homosexuality malarkey wouldn’t have gone down well in my neighborhood…!

      Reply
    • “Can you tell me of anyone who decided to be straight or gay?”

      We are all born with a sexuality but if I decide that based on personality I was attracted to a man that should be no business of yours either, it is perfectly possible to be sexually attracted to people not within the Venn diagram of your genetic sexuality, that must be recognised too. In fact I have a very strong feeling that as it becomes less taboo, to actually choose based on the person will become a far more common thing in the distant future.

      Just a thought

      Reply
    • @Ian walsh….whats wrong if ur born or chose to be gay…is their life end off

      Reply
    • Fair play to her with this one I hope other countries follow suit and implement similar legislation I support this action 100%, its about time sombody took the directive

      Reply
    • Conor
      maybe that is what is called bi-sexual ! just a thought :)
      Having said that I think this woman president Sirleaf is disgraceful in her attitude and she should be stripped of the honour of being a nobel peace prize recipient.

      Reply
  • Being gay isn’t new,people have been gay since people have existed. When the hell will people just accept it and move on? Stupid woman!

    Reply
  • Liberia is a bit like Ireland in some respects, in that while they profess that church and state are separate, it’s really operated as a Christian country, with schools etc teaching religion (ie Christian religion) as a core subject, businesses closed on Sunday & church holidays and so on.

    This is the extreme sort of legislation you get when you impose the beliefs of a religion on the affairs of state. We, thankfully, are moving away from this kind of thing, though we have a way to travel yet. I had enormous admiration for this woman when I read about her after she was awarded the Nobel Prize. It’s evaporated now, she really ought to be ashamed, as should Tony Blair for copping out of commenting.

    Reply
  • james 20/03/12 #

    So thats the sorta of people who get Nobel Peace awards..yeah rite. Just take the bloody thing off her.

    Reply
  • james 20/03/12 #

    Ok..so if this is their ethos..lets give one to Mugabee, that Syrian tyrant…Hilter, Sadam, and any other dead murderer of civilians. My stomach is turning. Imagine the fear both lesbian and gay people must be living under in that country. A disgrace.

    Reply
  • With repressive laws they can’t really justify calling the country Liberia anymore, can they?

    Reply
  • I think Quentin Crisp was bang on in 1968 when he said “Enlightenment does not produce tolerance, tolerance is the result of boredom. The facts have to be repeated over and over until in the end people say “Alright so your queer just talk about something else” and then the work is done”.

    Reply
  • What an ignorant hypocrite, did she not get her prize for fighting against “traditional values” and male dominated society?

    Reply
  • It just goes to show how corrupt the Nobel Peace Prize Committee are
    These are basic fundamental human rights.

    Reply
    • That’s a non sequitur.
      She won the “Nobel Peace Prize”, not the “Nobel Human Rights” prize.

      Though the prize has become a joke lately, what with Al Gore and then Obama getting it (for not being George W. Bush).

      Reply
  • The Nobel Prizes have been a joke for a long time but that’s not the issue here. The west should start cutting back it’s aid to African governments that pass laws like this and channel the funds into non discriminatory NGO’s operating in those countries. In 2008 alone the Liberian government was spending seven time’s it’s own national budget in foreign aid, which is a problem in itself, and if they and other states continue to pass laws like this then we can be assured they’ll be using funds they receive in intergovernmental aid to enforce these laws. If anything it’s yet another reason why intergovernmental aid should be scrapped altogether in favor of direct aid and micro-loans.

    Yes, there is a point when people say such a thing would just be western liberals enforcing their views on sovereign African states by endorsing such policies, but individual rights always come before state’s rights and somebody has to do something if those states aren’t protecting the civil rights of their citizens if only to make a point about it.

    Reply
  • Anton. really. what a stupid statement. and as for tony Blair. that confounding makes it sound like he agrees with and and just championed the rights of gay people in the UK cos it was part me his job. That’s a shocking law to bring in .

    Reply
  • Is it a surprise that in a country torn apart by civil war, where ritual sacrifice and cannibalism were commonplace, that laws such as this were implemented! Google Joshua Blahyi, a leader of rebellion in Liberia, who has admitted to murder and cannibalism, but has been acquitted of his crimes because he’s now a preacher! It is a sad fact that in countries with extreme religiosity, there are more limiting and sometimes hateful laws!

    Reply
  • The liberal western view is predominant in the comments here. Liberia is not D4 and does not have RTE and Fianna Fail to promote a liberal western worldview

    Liberia is Africa, and if the Liberian President became a homosexual rights advocate, she’d become unemployed the same day. It’s a shame so many people here choose to mindlessly condemn her without considering where she is.

    “The George” would likely not trade very long in Freetown before being burned down by the people, whatever the legal status of such a place and it’s clientele.

    Reply
    • So people who are advocates for human rights in hostile countries should remain silent? Kieran with your train of thought we would be still living in the caves.

      Reply
    • I don’t consider it a human rights issue, actually. I’m still in the cave by your standards, but I don’t go by your standards.

      Reply
    • Kieran, whats your view on homosexuality?

      Reply
    • Glad you clarified your position.

      Reply
    • So Kieran, its not a human rights issue when, um humans can be tortured, imprisoned and killed for a biological fact they have no control over?? Perhaps you would prefer that all gays take whatever they get silently, and enter into sham marriages, rather then speak out and seek equality?

      Reply
    • I agree that it might be impractical for the current president of Liberia to support gay rights but that doesn’t mean western countries should just accept her stance. By that logic , we should just disregard the human rights violations against women in Saudi Arabia simply because its in the middle east. Also, why not forget the human rights of Christians or the Ahmadiyya community in predominantly muslim countries? A western worldview on an Irish website- shocking.

      Also, unless you’re referring to some obscure village in Liberia, I think you mean Monrovia.

      Reply
    • @ Dylan – He’s getting confused with the capital of Sierra Leone, a neighbour of Liberia.

      @ Kieran, that kind of apathy is pretty shocking. Charles Taylor would still be President if people in Liberia were unwilling to stand up to injustice.

      Reply
    • @ Jamie Its not apathy, it’s a viewpoint diametrically opposed to most of those expressed here. Lifted straight from the NT, reinforced by conscience and nature.

      Reply
  • Its up to each individual community to set the parameters for acceptable behaviour. Liberia has the right to do so.

    Reply

Add New Comment