TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 2 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Poll: Is Cyprus right to tax people’s savings?

Cyprus is trying to push ahead with the EU bailout deal which will see people’s savings taxed – but is this fair?

Image: AP Photo/Petros Karadjias

CYPRUS POLITICIANS FACE an uphill battle today to pass the EU’s bailout deal for the island with its deeply unpopular proposal to tax people’s savings.

The one-off  bank levy is unprecedented in EU bailouts. The move is aimed at getting money from rich depositors – particularly Russian oligarchs, who are believed to have billions in Cyprus’s banks – who will pay the most amount of money, but will affect anyone with any money in a savings account. It will also reduce the amount of money that the country will need from EU creditors in the bailout.

So today we’re asking: Is Cyprus right to tax people’s savings?


Poll Results:




Read next:

Comments (192 Comments)

  • Its not fair to tax a person on savings as presumably they would already have paid income tax on it..

    Reply
    • VRT is the same. As is VAT. The money you use to pay for a car has already been taxes but an additional tax is then applied to it. Not saying its right, just that its nothing new.

      Reply
    • The reason it’s unfair is that it only affects people who have savings. Those who are frivolous with their money get off scott free.

      Reply
    • Yes Kevin but you have a choice as to wether to buy a new car that incurred VRT or a second hand one that doesn’t

      Reply
    • Fair point

      Reply
    • Paul

      2nd hand cars have already had VRT applied to them, when they were registered.

      VRT stands for Vehicle Registration Tax which is applied to every Irish car to enable them to get a registration number. As so it is applied once and once only. VRT is applied after VRT therefore considered a double tax.

      VAT is Value Added Tax and is applied to all goods and services sold in Ireland. Where a car dealer sells a 2nd hand car or any business sells a 2nd hand item they charge VAT, even though VAT was charged on the car / item when it was new.

      So should we also consider VAT charged on a 2nd hand item as a double tax? Maybe so.

      Reply
    • I bet, the rich won’t feel the hit as much as the ordinary citizen. Yet it’s the rich and wealthy, that gambled and busted the banks and economy!

      Reply
    • The EU can do as they like. It is all to do with Frau Merkel’s re-election. Russians have billions in Cypriot banks. She did not want German taxpayers bailoug out these olilgarchs

      Reply
    • Yes, but VAT and VRT etc are taxes on consumption. Not the same as this case at all.

      Reply
    • All that has happened in Cyprus is the Government applied a DIRT tax in a very crude way. They wanted the money/tax now – not in 12 months time. We’ve been paying DIRT tax for years on savings, whether it was on savings of €1 or €1 million – now the Cypriots and others will be paying it.

      Reply
    • VRT is illegal under the free movement of goods in eu law.

      Reply
    • This is not a tax, this is pure expropriation. And what about the EU wide deposit protection scheme? What about the Cyprus deposit protection scheme? What about ripping the rule book and placing sub-ordinated bond holders above the depositors? All of this don’t matter to the Dutch and German proponents of this scheme I guess because the deposit money is perceived to be of Russian criminals and retired expats from the UK.

      Reply
    • And for those comparing this raid to DIRT, let me shed some light on the matter. A 100k will yield you 2.5k in interest assuming 2.5% rate (not happening in Cyprus but anyway) and the 25% DIRT on that is 0.5k. The 5.6% raid on the other hand is 5.6k on 100k meaning that they will take 12 years worth of DIRT in one go. So obviously, those of you comparing this to DIRT haven’t a faintest idea what you’re on about and probably haven’t ever received more than a tenner in annual interest from the grand you have with the local credit union.

      Reply
    • Good god man, think. Of course it its not illegal. It wouldn’t exist if it were. You really shouldn’t believe everything that you hear.

      Reply
  • No, not right to steal a person’s life savings.

    Reply
  • No wonder EZ Living have a half price sale on mattress’s at the moment. That’s where most people will be keeping their money for the foreseeable future.

    Reply
  • Surprised our boys dident think of this scam first

    Reply
  • deirdre 18/03/13 #

    Mammy told me to save for a rainy day. I thought that was meant to be MY rainy day and not the governments rainy day. I hope robbing savings never happens

    Reply
  • Leaving morality aside, it’s a stupid move. With the inevitable run on the banks they will end up broke and need even more money for recapitalization. It’s a cynical ploy, no more, no less, and one which is doomed to fail. Cyprus needs money in to the country, not a financial flight!

    Reply
    • While there is something to be said for the depositors in poorly run banks, who would have been picking up big interest rates as a result, picking up the tab for their poor investment: this is a very silly decision. Watch funds run out of Spain, Italy, Portugal and … Ireland.

      Reply
  • This is theft. Simple… If they get away with it, it will happen here too.

    Reply
    • Agreed joe..at least with the household and water charges the government try to spin them as charges for a service..as you said, this is just theft..and wouldnt at all be surprised to see it here!

      Reply
    • DIRT already raids the few quid people have on deposit in this country already and they already raided the pension funds and now revenue given the powers to dip into your bank account.
      VAT at highest levels ever, Universal poverty tax etc

      We have accepted all of this already so why the outrage that the Cypriots have gone for those who have cash to spare.

      Seems we are greatly upset for other nations but we don’t care about whats happening to ourselves.

      Reply
    • When you consider it’s only wealthy people who have money saved, maybe it’s not such a bad idea?

      Reply
    • “it’s only wealthy people who have money saved”

      So anyone who isn’t living entirely hand to mouth is “wealthy”?

      That’s infantile.

      Reply
    • @Mike
      Most savers aren’t wealthy, just prudent. All this does is punish the prudent and reward the feckless.

      Reply
    • bullshit mattoid, many people genuinely cant afford to save, so you would prefer to tax those that can barely put food on the table? none of this is fair, but its most unfair on the poorest, the money should not have to be paid but if it is paid, it should be paid by those who wont be physically effected by the action of paying

      Reply
    • actually Mike is right, there are billions in savings held in irish banks, just check out the central banks figures ….I wouldn’t normally agree with touching people’s saving but if they have a substantial amount, I’m not so sure (of course this is subject as it as a matter of opinion what substantial means, usually its someone with more than you have)

      Reply
    • mattoid 18/03/13 #

      @RP
      Yes, there are some who can’t afford to save, but thats not the whole picture.

      Many in Ireland, myself included, often scrimped and went without in order to put aside a modest rainy day fund and provide a little more security for the future while others were all to happy to blow their money on meals out, alcohol, and other general stuff they didn’t need. Fair enough – its their money and their choice to do what they want with it, but why should I and others like me now be punished??

      Reply
    • im not suggesting you should be punished but don’t tar all non-savers with the same brush, the reality is that almost everyone is getting punished for the mistakes of the few, including those that couldn’t afford to save, so that system is even more unfair, the difference in this case is they are targeting a group of people that are more likely to be pro-active about responding

      Reply
    • Attackthetax.com join legal action against property tax

      Reply
    • Are you a cavan man ?

      Reply
  • On most savings tax of some description has been paid. Between Income tax, DIRT, Exit Tax or Inheritence tax, savings are already hit in a fair, albeit very expensive way (DIRT and Exit Tax up a further 12% in 5 years).

    To then hit savers with a levy because they have saved money is completely unfair.

    Reply
  • It is not Tax no matter how you dress it. It’s THEFT !!

    Reply
    • here here!!

      Reply
    • Yes – It Theft – but the robbers are getting away with it , here ,in UK Spain , Italy etc etc . Its no use saying – wait until 2015 – and we will vote against u – and put u out of office – u will be sorry then . They [ the politicins here in Ireland could not care less . they will hvae their Pensions , their directorships etc .
      Iif someone atacked u in the street and robbed u – would anyone be ok with that situation . Yet – that is waht is happening here and in many countries

      Reply
  • I predict a run on the banks in Cyprus.

    I would immediately remove any savings I had, if they were to even hint at introducing this here.

    Reply
  • This is a tax on the principal, NOT the interest accrued on it. Thus, the deposit is reduced so the holder is impoverished. With a tax on interest only the deposited funds remain intact (to gain interest to tax another day, no doubt)

    Reply
  • This is a step too far, no matter what the local factors are, it’s a dangerous precedent that should never happen.

    Reply
  • Deposits, and interest earned on same deposits, belongs to the person whose money it is. Interest is your reward for lending the bank your money. It does not belong to government…they already had income tax out of it. NO WAY should they be allowed to take a further cut of YOUR money.

    Reply
    • Agree. In some cases people have paid income tax or Inheritance tax and then saved the net, paid DIRT on the interest or exit tax on the profits (if any) in the cases of investments. And in some cases all 4! What is worse is some people have their money in the post office giving the state access to these funds (hence the exemption of DIRT in most cases). It would then be an insult to be taxed on this for a 3rd time. The Pension levy is robbery enough!

      Reply
  • No disrespect intended but thats a stupid question,guess there was nothing else to rob from the cypriot people!seeing as our govt is not dealing with any of the causes of our demise,and has reformed nothing in any of our public services or banks we will run out of money again shortly ,so keep an eye out,the Irish political machine must be fed soon,you are on the menu!

    Reply
  • Well the government we have in will most likely do the same to us after all they love to copy what countries are doing ! Prats …..

    Reply
  • No – and its utter disgrace that our despicable back-stabbing government is supporting it.
    …But what can one expect from traitors to one own people in this country or in Greece!

    Reply
  • Years ago i heard the older folk say they would never trust their money to a bank, leave it under the mattress, they said, i can totally understand what they meant now………..

    Reply
  • A run on Cypriot banks has already started. ATMs are emptied already. It will be fun there tomorrow. Who it there right mind would hold funds in Cyprus now? A far bigger bank bailout will be required for Cyprus now even if they back down on their proposed “levy”.

    Reply
  • What will they think of next, when you save it’s for your benifit not to save the country, no more than our country if it was governed properly there would be no need for this. Greed is a curse and it’s the ordinary people that pay the biggest price.

    Reply
  • The principle of a levy on savings in order to plug gaps in the Banks capital is madness. it will lead to a flight from banks in Italy, Spain and possibly France. Why would you risk leaving money on deposit in any country that may need a bailout in the future.

    I could not believe my ears when I heard that an Irish Government spokesperson welcomed the deal as good for Ireland, good for Europe and good for Cyprus. Have they taken leave of their senses. It may well be that, short of going bust, there was no alternative for Cyprus but no rightminded person could ever consider this “a good deal”. That statement from the Irish Government shows exactly why this coalition is a one term trick.

    Reply
  • The Cyprus Government must be getting idea’s from our lot…………just hope it does not boomerang back…

    Reply
  • what other strings are attached to the “bailout”, tax hikes & spending cuts?

    Reply
  • War has been declared on the ordinary citizens of Europe. The only difference this time round is that the aggressors dont wear specific uniforms

    Reply
    • By removing the bank guarantee for depositors in Ireland our government are distancing themselves for what’s to come. They know that Cyprus is anything but a ‘special’ case and the fact that they are in the process (began before this assault on Cypriot depositors was publicly known) of stripping away protection for Irish depositors so as to be in line with German thinking on the issue. The sequence of events tells me this is a structured assault on the ordinary EU citizen for them to continue to bail out an essentially bankrupt and corrupt system…… So yes a fiscal war has been ongoing now for several years. As for the culprits, given that FG continually support the German line (of Merkle) then the likeliest aggressors are the Christian Democrat Union (CDU) collective within European politics.

      Reply
  • cut the bondholders fairly and by fairly I mean they can well afford to take a big hit, then and only then come back and ask the people by way of a ballot if they’ll contribute a little towards it

    Reply
  • What they’re proposing isn’t a tax, it’s quite simply theft. It’s crazy that people believe capitalism still exists, more examples of the complete and utter failure of the free market model. Germany and its slave states, propping up its banks. Trying to compare this to a tax based on spending such as VAT or VRT is an inherently flawed argument.

    Reply
  • It’s wrong to tax someones saving, but I read a piece in the independent that 40% of monies held in Cypriot banks is from the Russian mafia who launder money through the banks of Cyprus, I suppose it begs the question if the authorities knew of this why didn’t they do something sooner rather than wait until this crisis

    Reply
  • Stupid bleedin question.

    Reply
  • guaranteed the Richest in cypress knew this was coming and their money is Now sitting in a Swiss bank account somewhere to avoid payment

    Reply
  • Back to stuffing money in your mattress so

    Reply
  • Denzil 18/03/13 #

    If this happened here I think it would be the straw that breaks the camels back , banks would be burnt to the ground

    Reply
    • I’d like to think so but going by the apathy in both the young and older generations with the latter having been through this many times already in their lifetime is shocking to say the least. It’s amazing how today, a world full of people are being told daily what bad shit is happening can sit back watching everything only getting worse globally and there are still only pockets of people fighting for change on the streets. in my opinion we’re the ones prolonging the pain of this corrupted and broken system on ourselves. this is a global issue and needs a global response whether we like it or not

      Reply
  • NOT FAIR….? ARGH.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  • Why is this even being debated. If this had happened five years ago we would have been shocked to our core. Have we been so brutalised by the last five years that we would even consider this as anything other than robbery by the State on peoples life savings.. Enough. Enough. Enough…..

    Reply
  • The only good thing one can say about this is that at least they are being up front about it. Here Revenue have been given the power to go into our accounts and remove an amount of money to cover an unjust levy. Here, it doesnt matter if you dont have savings, they will have first call on your living income even if that means you have no money for food or other bills for yourself and your family. War has been declared – what Cyprus is doing is merely declaring the rules of one battle of many

    Reply
  • Time to burn and turn

    Reply
  • If this tax was only put out there to target the rich depositors as it states in the article, why isnt it being taken only from people with over a certain amount in their savings instead as usual taking from the people who can least afford it, just like every day in Ireland……

    Reply
  • This is government theft – and it is disgusting.

    Reply
  • This is not a tax call it what you like it is nothing but robbery, I hope the people have the sense to withdraw all their money from the banks if they go through with it , let them go broke yes break the banks the people have to make a stand, its time to say stop.

    Reply
  • Its a test case to see the public’s reaction. They will be doing this to all europeans in the near future.

    Reply
  • To tax savings is a total rob.

    Reply
  • JOSE 18/03/13 #

    Of course it’s not right, and speaking for myself I will be withdrawing what little savings I have first thing Tuesday.

    Reply
  • Outrageous…if it was German bankers who held those deposits this wouldn’t even be Dreamt of!

    Reply
  • i would advise them to run,, get out of eec,,, before they screw them as they did here,,, if we all said no,, they would not be backing up german banks on unsecure bonds,, another country on their way to going bust,, this is beyond control,,, there is not an eec just a bunch of countrys owing them billions over next 50 years,, god bless cyprus

    Reply
  • Wonder if this is an EU/Troika tactic to cripple the Cypriot economy further the same way the blanket guarantee did here. Nobody in their right mind would think of a 10% tax on bank deposits as a means of helping! All it will do is create a run on the banks and ruin them overnight. This will force Cyprus into accepthing whatever terms the IMF impose on them just like we had to and make them financially dependent on the beneficence of the EU/Troika

    Reply
  • Lifting the bank guarantee from the end of March, under the guise of returning to normal banking practices (so they can shaft you even more), allows now the opportunity to hit depositors in this way here in Ireland. You’ve been spanked again……. you gullible lot!

    Reply
  • If they really need to do it,why not have higher tax over €100K to hit the Russian mafia and no tax on smaller savings say up to €30k.

    Reply
    • Even a tax on savings over 100k will affect ordinary people, 150,000 for example, isn’t much if you sold your home in England after retirement, retired to Cyprus, deposited that money in one of their banks and planned to live out the rest of your days there. The governments are making serious mistakes, whatever confidence people may have had in banks is disappearing rapidly. I am closing my savings account tomorrow, there’s not much in it but what is there, I would like to be mine wholly.

      Reply
  • easy come easy go !!!!!!!!! who would trust a bank or a banker

    Reply
  • Cyprus is an off shore tax haven and has also been used for hot money deposits. I would have preferred to see a threshold exiting and then a much higher rate, possibly sliding scale on top.

    As for Ireland, please relax. The Government Guarantee of the 29the September 2008 was to protect the very large high interest depositors in Anglo Irish Bank. So big money will always be protected in Ireland.

    In Ireland we do things differently. We prefer to tax the poor and the middle classes. The plutocrats receive preferential treatment and not merely in the active facilitation of non resident tax status for our tax exiles.

    If such a deposit levy were to be introduced in Ireland, it would be selectively applied to the more modest deposits and the wealthier would be shielded. Why? Because the wealthy are driven only by the wish to create employment, not to enrich themselves at the expense of others. We must preserve and protect the wealthy and we must ensure that real tax is only for the little people.

    Reply
  • I cant believe thats even a question. Is it right to tax savings? No! Never! Anywhere! was the poll even necessary?

    Reply
  • They are already doing the same thing in Ireland. We are getting taxed on our retirement savings accounts, at an annual rate, at least this is only a one off payment. Every year in Ireland we get taxed on the same savings. Absolute nonsense. This is nothing new, it’s shameful, but we were the first to get such a tax.

    Reply
  • Its theft, its immoral and its criminal. And its STILL a far better outcome than the 40 year millstone forced around our neck by fine gael.

    Says it all really.

    Reply
    • God, you’re pathetic.

      Reply
    • Kevin, the only thing pathetic here is your apparent support for a much despised, traitorous government.

      Reply
    • it maybe morally repugnant to you personally, but if its written in law, however unjust you think that law is, it isn’t criminal and it isn’t theft. Far too often seeing that nonsense written in the comments section, or hear it on whineline (for the 3 seconds I can stomach listening to it).

      Reply
    • he is pathetic shaw? on a different thread yesterday you were claiming to have done your bit for the country by ‘pounding the pavements’, then later in the same thread you claimed that you weren’t promoting any political party, so unless you were using a jack-hammer to remove a dangerous public path, then i suggest that wandering aimlessly about in your evening meanderings wasn’t much help to anyone

      Reply
    • @biggins- yeah. I just wish I could follow a realistic alternative with a coherent, rationale well thought out medium term economic strategy like your beloved DDI. Oh wait, no. My mistake. They’re a bunch of clowns that no one is listening to, completely devoid of actual policies as opposed to populist aspirations.

      Reply
    • I think we all know who ‘kevin’ is. He pops up out of his gopher hole to toe the party line i.e. excuse the inexcusable, or else to insult people who insult his dear leader or party policy. He cant argue, debate or even hold a conversation.

      Yep, everyone else is SO pathetic ‘kevin’

      Reply
    • @peasant- it’s pathetic to blame an incumbent Government for a mess they inherited. That werejammin’s memory can’t extend beyond two years is pretty sad. History will show that the calamity that has befallen this country was entirely of FF’s making and that this Government ( which is made up of two parties, by the way) only crime has been to try and mop up their mess as best they could. Rubbish as spouted above just succeeds in restoring the fortunes of FF as an amnesiac electorate returns to their fold. And you’re every bit as bad with your innocent, naive tripe about telling the EU where to get off and defaulting on debt. It’s great to be a dreamer but now’s not the time for messers.

      Reply
    • Yep, its everyones fault except YOUR partys ‘kevin’. They just happen to be in government and happened to convert the illegal promissory notes into sovereign debt. Yes, nothing to do with them.

      Yawn.

      Reply
    • Ah, now…werejammin that’s very hurtful.

      Reply
    • we will see kevin, a lot of people are starting to realise that the loyalty voter is the stupid voter and just how little morals our ‘leaders’ have, you just keep spouting your sycophantic clap-trap, when i read one of your posts, ive read them all

      Reply
    • And what about the clowns in the current circus I suppose u think they are doing a fine job

      Reply
    • So long as it’s legalised theft thats ok then i feel so much better now,it is this type of logic that allows governments to walk all over people.

      Reply
    • The irony of an attention-seeking, narrow-minded, miserable excuse for a troll like you calling someone else pathetic only shows how deeply flawed an individual you are. Shill

      Reply
    • That’s why FF are climbing up the polls. FG knew what they were inheriting but still chose to use lies to get elected and I’m not a FFer

      Reply
    • @werejammin- if you thought the damage that FF did could be painlessly reversed in two years you’re a bigger clown than I thought.

      Reply
    • poor ol kev, paralyzed from the neck up but still convincing himself that he can understand what’s happening

      Reply
    • @peasant- having a go at the disabled?

      Reply
    • yes…

      Reply
    • Eh, isn’t assuming a fake identity to attack someone called trolling?

      Reply
    • censored 18/03/13 #

      Only if it’s witty. And by Kevin’s standards a goldfish could be witty.

      Reply
    • @ Padriag O’Utraged – Thank you for this, a bit of sense. The facts are what are, not what a person wants them to be. If I get diagnosed with cancer, saying “I don’t have cancer” isn’t going to help me any. You’re right when you say this is a legal action, it is not theft. It doesn’t mean I like it, but I have to admit to the truth:

      “This is theft” – No it’s not.
      “Its not our debt.” – Yes, it is.
      “The Germans forced us into it.” – The Germans didn’t force us into anything. We asked for a bailout, the ECB gave us what we asked for.
      “It’s the fourth Reich” – No, it’s not. Germany does not want to expand it’s territory, it’s still trying to come to terms financially with reunification. Merkel is the Europhile in the German parliament, saying she is a reborn Hilter is absolutely crazy, and there’s enough other German politicians who would be happy to remove Germany and all german aid from the EU.

      etc, etc,

      Reply
  • COULD THE SAME HAPPEN HERE. ?

    Reply
    • Of course it could. We have let the government walk over us all before, how could we stop it now.

      Reply
    • Only if we require a second bailout, that could potentially be a condition attached. Which would people prefer…years of tough budgets that constantly chip away at our income or a painful once off hit followed by presumably less extreme budgets?
      I’m still undecided myself but the only thing that is certain is the fact that it is going to be one of these options.

      Reply
    • even if they didn’t directly go after savings in the bank here they’ve effectively robbed us as it is, have you seen the debt clock recently?? http://www.nationaldebtclocks.org/debtclock/ireland The forestry and the rest are to be sold off for pennies and it will cost the state much more in the near to distant future than we could ever hope to get for the sale, our fishing is worth a fraction of what it was, our oil and gas is given away in such a way it benefits the Irish people in no way, shape or form, our water, air and food are being poisoned, services have been cut for 5 years now and we still haven’t hit rock bottom, I could go on and on and on so you can just add all the other horrible fallout from taking on the private and banking debt and letting those at the very top, yes the banking families that control the financial system and all it owns, Governments and media corporations, local councils, religion, food/water stocks, war on terror/drugs my arse!! all corrupted to the point of no return in my opinion. Our future and that of our unborn children and grandchildren depend on us changing this system by whatever means necessary. how much more of the mans bullshit are we going to take?? Not just locally or within Ireland, but globally because it’s global issue of too much power and control in too few, very tightly connected hands.

      Reply
    • Hear hear, well put! Wake up people!

      Reply
  • No…no…no.no…….no….no…no

    Reply
  • Find another way to raise money. It’s there if you look.

    Reply
  • Its basically stealing from people.

    Reply
  • It won’t happen here. This is one step to far. If they tried it in Dublin you can be sure the government would collapse as TD’s will end up being attacked in the street. I know that is would be something that would bring me out on the streets

    Reply
    • censored 18/03/13 #

      Not sure there is any insult or injury that can awaken the “sleeping giant” of Irish citizenry. I expected it long before, but apparently emigration provides enough of a safety valve. The “Fighting Irish” – just an American football team, the real Irish are sheep to be sheared.

      Reply
  • the one thing i cannot understand is why people still use banks?

    Reply
  • Juliet 18/03/13 #

    This made me speechless.
    I’m just an international student who is studying in Cyprus. Guess I shouldn’t have come here in the first place.
    How could I explain to my parents who sacrificed everything to send me to university?
    How am I supposed to afford the food/rent…
    It’s gonna be another sleepless night.

    Reply
  • sean 18/03/13 #

    There is something very , very sinister going on here ,
    Cyprus threatened to bring down the euro !!!!!
    detriot michicgan has been declared bankcrupt , its 10times the size of cyprus , yet its declared bankcrupcy didn,t even create the tiniest ripple effect on the dollar .

    Its all lies and complete bully boy tactics from ze germans

    Reply
  • What idiots said yes to this poll????? In all fairness !!!!

    Reply
  • James 18/03/13 #

    He’ll no it’s no fair
    The Germans are right the pen is mightier than the sword
    They couldn’t take Europe with all the military might
    Simple as a signature

    Reply
  • Alvaro 18/03/13 #

    The European Union and the European Central Bank and the IMF have just advocated the confiscation of private property for their own indulgence.?Bank accounts are not bonds or stocks or some other form of investments. It is private property like your house or your car. Germany, France et al came in and said, ?We want it and we are taking it and it is necessary for our government.? These countries did not demand it, yet, from their own citizens though they might soon but they demanded it from the citizens of Cyprus in exchange for funds. This is not a European Union this is a European Fourth Reich!

    ?The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the law of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.?-John Adams

    Reply
  • They already tax our savings here, DIRT is paid on all deposits here and the government upped it a few years ago

    Reply
  • Michael 18/03/13 #

    Inflation still hurts more

    Reply
    • we would be blessed to have strong inflation here, it would mean we could pay off personal debt and mortgages much faster, would destroy the banks though

      Reply
    • The benefits of high inflation would be dwarfed by the disadvatages; ie, cost of living would rise while wages would not, so more people would either be pushed under the poverty line or forced to seek credit to make ends meet.

      Be careful what you wish for.

      Reply
    • yes, you are right, euro membership would make inflation worse than useless, even if we were to leave the euro inflation would still only cause harm because we would still owe money in euros, under normal circumstances controlled inflation can help a small economy, but of course we no longer control financial policy

      Reply
    • censored 18/03/13 #

      Noonan’s plan on the promissory notes relies on inflation. But inflation is an uncontrollable beast that the EU has sworn to keep in its box …. so we have to have deflation instead and ain’t it working well! (but does that poke a hole in Herr Noonan’s promissory notes argument?)

      Reply
    • In the past few years the cost of living in Cyprus has gone up rapidly. Somehow I doubt the wages went up with it.

      Reply
  • They could just keep their savings in cash.. Maybe people say thats not safe, but these days its not even safe to put your money in a bank..

    Reply
  • @Peston: trying something new, Twitter Q&A on Cyprus, at 4pm. If appeals, tweet questions on the messy bailout to @bbc_haveyoursay or #askbbcpeston

    Reply
  • Tax the fools who got them in trouble not the working people

    Reply
  • Bob Peston of BBC tweeted

    @Peston: trying something new, Twitter Q&A on Cyprus, at 4pm. If appeals, tweet questions on the messy bailout to @bbc_haveyoursay or #askbbcpeston

    Reply
  • Funny how the same people on here who day in, day out argue that the rich should be taxed and the poorer left alone see this as theft. Surely the more money you have saved, the richer you are & the harder you will be hit? Can’t have it both ways.

    Reply
    • Luke 18/03/13 #

      DDI Ben Gilroy.

      Reply
    • thats a different issue but as usual you cant see the wood for the trees, its using poor peoples hard earned money to protect the savings and investments of the rich that is so hard to stomach, try opening your eyes for once

      Reply
    • No, peasant- between 35% and 50% of deposits in Cypriot banks are Russian investments. The EU’s argument is that it doesn’t want to cover billionaire Russian oligarchs. So it’s not the common man being targeted and it looks today like an even higher rate will be applied to those above €100k and a lower rate applied to those below it to rebalance the suffering away from ordinary Cypriots. I dont like it in principle, either but the alternative mechanism would be draconian taxation in Cyprus which most certainly wouldn’t help the common man or hurt outside investors. So who can’t see the wood from the trees?

      Reply
    • still clouding the issue, they are stealing money from peoples savings there, over here they steal the money to protect peoples savings, we want to see an end to the theft no matter what form it takes

      Reply
    • Maybe the alternative would be to burn the bond holders.

      Reply
    • I wish you’d mentioned that earlier, Paul. If only someone had thought of that?

      Reply
    • ” the euro zone has again shown that no principle is above political meddling. The cleaner solution would have been a 20% haircut on deposits over €100,000, with writedowns on all bank debt. This would have respected creditor hierarchy and, by not trampling on deposit insurance, honored the rule of law.”

      When the wall Street Journal, the voice of free-for-all capitalism, says this, who am I to argue with them?

      PS North of Ireland banks welcome Southern depositors!

      Reply
    • @Barry: Do you need to have a NI address to open an account up there. I have no idea…

      Reply
    • Andrea, I do not have one myself but The people I know who opened Northern accounts just needed the usual papers: personal ID and proof of address. They had no problems.

      Reply
    • @ Paul – What bondholders? How are these mythic figures in this particular case??

      Reply
    • Don’t just red-thumb, answer the question, who are the bondholders in this particular case? ( Hint: Cyprus’ inability to finance itself is a direct result to their reliance and exposure to the Greek economy ). “Burn the bondholders”? Who is there to burn in this case?

      Reply
    • What they are doing here is trying to Scare/Ride…the shit out of ordinary working people who try to save a few quid every week from their shit wages for a rainy day. Dont worry ,,the real rich will not suffer.

      Reply
  • Unfortunately, it is the right thing to do. An alternative would be raise the equivalent amount through taxation, imposed on everybody regardless of ability to pay. At least in taxing savings the money is there and the impact on say to say living is far less

    Reply
  • Who has over €100,000 to play around with in Cyprus, they should cry, we have the DIRT tax and a slight increase coming down the road of 3%

    Reply
  • Tax them, we get taxed d.i.r.t surprised so many voted no. Don’t understand what makes cyprus so special

    Reply

Add New Comment