TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 5 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Poll: Should the European Union have won the Nobel prize?

The Nobel committee says the EU has ended the prospect of European wars – but with the financial crisis, is it deserved?

Image: Geert Vanden Wijngaert/AP

MANY EYEBROWS were raised yesterday when it was announced that the European Union had been awarded the 2012 Nobel Peace Prize, for its work in seeing historical enemies “become close partners”.

The citation from the Norwegian Nobel Committee said the EU had helped to eliminate the barriers between east and west Europe, and virtually guaranteed that there would be no further wars between the major military powers of Western Europe.

At the same time, though, the EU is facing what many see as the greatest threat to the European project – the debt crisis which has seen major social unrest in many European countries and threatens to create a two-tier Europe, undermining the EU’s broader goals.

Though the EU has done plenty to avert the threat of military conflict between its members and in the wider world, for some its popularity has never been lower. So – should the European Union have won the Nobel Peace Prize?


Poll Results:





Read: European Union awarded 2012 Nobel Peace Prize

More: So, how are you going to spend your share of the Nobel prize?

Read next:

Comments (88 Comments)

  • Yes, people are complaining mainly due to their dislike of the EU due to economic and political reasons but in terms of wars Europe has never been calmer.

    Reply
    • What about our conflict in other regions. Iraq and Afghanistan come to mind. Don’t forget Britain is part or the EU

      Reply
    • Im talking about wars in Europe not wars by Europeans of which the UK is the most Eurosceptic! The EU created a stable platform to sort out differences and has given grants to hundreds of peace and reconcilliation projects around Europe (Including a lot in the north) so even though its in no way perfect its also not all bad!

      Reply
    • Micheal 13/10/12 #

      @David, one step at a time.

      Reply
    • I’m not sure winning a peace prize for not fighting within it own borders is appropriate when members of that union engage in offensive action. I take the point that the EU is relatively peaceful for the time being (I’m not absolutely convinced it will say at peace) but by that measure should the US or the federal nation of Canada have been more deserving as they have been at peace for a much longer period and are far more stable than the EU

      Reply
    • Yes but America and Canada dont have a history of going to war in their borders- Europe does, its the changing of the situation rather than the situation itself

      Reply
    • American civil war. French British war. War or independence. War on Mexico resulting in Texas and new Mexico. It’s a much younger “democracy” nation with not the same history or social divide. During the times of the roman empire things were fairly peacefully within Europe for a greater length of time. As with this project it will succeed or fail with the economy and with all parties being satisfied that they are better in rather than out. With what is going on right now in relation to Spain Greece Italy and us things are not looking good.
      While the formation of the EU helped to provide a mechanism for nations to get on. Its primarily an ecomonomic and trading union and intended to be just that. The United Nations was set up for conflict resolution and disputes

      Reply
  • patrick 13/10/12 #

    absolutely not.

    But now that it’s been awarded, I’m quite humbled to be honoured with it. Meet up with you all in Oslo for the award ceremony, ok?

    Reply
  • The EU (ECSC,EEC,EC,now EU) was basically founded to prevent World War 3, so far I would say job well done (with some mess ups along the way). If you disagree take a look at some history books, examine the situations that led to WW1 & WW2 and suggest a better way to prevent that maddness from happening again.

    I wonder if people in 1912 imagined the horrors that were to follow a few years later possible?

    Reply
    • What’s happening right now in Europe is eerily similar to what happened pre-WWII. If you think the EU is preventing that and not part of the problem you’re a tad deluded dude.

      Reply
    • Martin, Michael is right I’m afraid. The entire concept of the EU and its predecessors was simple. Integrate the European countries to such an extent economically that war between them would become almost impossible. France and Germany have been knocking the crap out of each other since the fall of Charlemagne’s empire. Now they are so economically reliant on each other that they couldn’t fight one another for more than a really short period before both of their economies collapse. That was their goal and they have so far succeeded spectacularly in that basic goal. The extra economical and political goals added on are questionable, but the original intent has been achieved.

      Reply
    • Dito @martin.

      Reply
    • Michael I believe the church had no small role to play in keeping peace in Europe after the war . Common bound Christian beliefs bound many of the democratic countries together and staved of the spread of communism. . The true enemy of Christian beliefs and democracy .

      Reply
    • *blinks rapidly*

      *re-reads Liam’s post*

      Reply
  • the EU is not the most popular of institutions at the moment back in Ireland (indeed, across many EU countries) …but let us not forget that it is not that long ago when the entire continent was beating the bejaysus out of each other…now we have a single currency, single health card, open borders, trade agreements etc…. its very easy (ineed, de mode) to knock the EU, and granted with some justification, but despite all that, let us not forget the momentous (unsung) achievements that have been made….

    Reply
  • I understand that people are disenchanted with the EU due to the ongoing economic problems but it’s very hard to deny it’s role in preventing war in Europe and in promoting diplomatic solutions to conflicts around the world.

    Someone made the point that some EU member states, e.g. the UK, have been involved in military actions outside Europe but that really isn’t the EU’s fault.

    If we had a real common security and defence policy including replacing NATO as the main military alliance in Europe then that would resolve that kind of problem, but I’m guessing that most of the people voting ‘No’ here would be just as fast to vote ‘No’ to that sort of proposal.

    Reply
  • Actually, here’s 5 very good reasons the EU SHOULD have won the prize, all referenced and indexed. People seem to forget that for all of our history, bar the years since creation of the EU bloc that different EU member states have been basically invading or murdering each other. The EU is a big reason why we have ceased to do so – http://t.co/diRjDm1x

    Reply
    • Yet the EU is a staunch defender of American foreign policy. So we’ve outsourced the invading and murdering. The EU is a union for corporate and political interests. Farcical decision.

      Reply
    • What a stunningly ignorant comment. Go open a history book, and chart euopean history up until 1945; notice a trend? The sole fact Germany and France haven’t been at war in over 70s years is by itself an impressive achievement. The United States has only existed since the 1700s, and your comparison is weak rhetoric

      Reply
    • And tell me, who is the Union in European Union? A union of normal people, deciding democratically what’s best for them? Or a union of vested interests who for example bully the people of Greece into accepting austerity that directly kills people? I know which one it is, you can pretend it’s some sort of bastion of democracy holding back the tides of war if you want.

      EU nations have been at war, just not on your doorstep. Ask an Afghan child how they feel about the EU winning the Nobel peace prize. Then ask them would they like a slice of an MEP’s salary :)

      Reply
    • Ignore them Martin. It’s a disgrace that the EU were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Lick a** at its best. Let’s totally ignore who is arming UK and America with their illegal wars with their ammunition factories arm and fund the War Machine with their bank loans. Sit back smugly and enjoy your fake award but don’t expect all of us to fall for this tripe. The EU as it currently stands is a farce. Peace my backside!

      Reply
    • Mjhint 13/10/12 #

      What about Yugoslavia Cyprus & northern Ireland. The EU is far from a peace keeper. Peace keeper must be prepared to go to war. Tell me where the EU has actively led that kind of action.

      Reply
    • What you say is inaccurate David. It’s peace in the first place that enabled the possibility of the European project, not the other way round. The 6 original states got together after WW2. Eastern European Countries joined AFTER the end of the Cold War. And now because of EU leaders’ mismanagement Spain and Greece are on the brink of a civil war.

      Reply
    • France and Germany haven’t been at war for 70 years for a number of reasons, none involving the EU. The main one was the partition of Germany after the war and US, UK and USSR bases in Germany ensuring she did not rise up again militarily. The Marshall Plan ensured that money came for rebuilding and so Germany did not feel aggrieved as she had after Versailles which allowed extremists to come to power. Another major reason for the peace has paradoxically been the Cold War. The coming together of former enemies in NATO and the Eastern Bloc in defence groupings against a common enemy actually helped keep peace in much the same way that each side having nuclear weapons deterred the other from going to war and using theirs. The EU started as an economic community, it’s supposed role in keeping peace in Europe has only become a line trotted out in the last 30 years by eurocrats seeking ever more political union and power for themselves. If Kissinger was the beginning of the end, Obama the fatal shot, this is the final nail in the coffin of the Nobel Peace Prize’s credibility. Who next year Ahmadinejad and Assad? A total joke.

      Reply
  • I heard they said “the union should not b allowed to fail….. Looks like there worried it could fail

    Reply
  • considering WWI + WWII started slap bang in d middle of Europe nd d strides that have been made, plus the fall of the Iron Curtain then surely its deserved for the 21st century…

    Reply
  • It’s curious that the EU is given the Nobel Peace Prize just when it appears to be on the verge of breaking up! Maybe it is a reminder that the benefits of community should outweigh the economic differences?

    Reply
  • I respect the point that the EU has prevented war but a bit puzzled about the timing , why give it the eu in 2012..it’s been on the go since the 1940s and you would have thought maybe after German unification and the berlin wall collapse 1989 might have been a more likely era to recognise the role of the union ??? Says a lot too about the notion that we ordinarily gave the award to people who contributed to peace rather than massive institutions , are there so few people doing the work of peace in the world today that nobody else could be found on the planet to recognise instead of a massive institution..

    Reply
    • Maybe because of the current EU turmoil, it is a good time to remember what the EU has achieved and be thankful for it.

      The EU is far from perfect -
      but they have turned shooting each other into just arguing and thats got to be better.

      Reply
  • Have FG taken credit for that yet?

    Reply
  • Peace prize should have gone to Gene Sharp. Nominated twice in 2009 and 2012.

    Gandhi was nominated many a times, but never awarded either. He was the biggest peace maker of all times.

    Reply
  • Robert Schuman was born in Luxembourg to a luxembourgish mother and a french father who was technically a german following the annexation the annexation of Alsace-Lorraine. He spoke luxembourgish, french and german, studies in Germany and became a french citizen following the return of Alsace-Lorraine. He lived through two world wars and while serving in Paul Reynaud’s wartime government, and even when interrogated by the Gestapo and at the height of the war, he spoke about reconciliation between France and Germany and post-war European Unity.

    In 1949 he said;

    ‘We are carrying out a great experiment, the fulfillment of the same recurrent dream that for ten centuries has revisited the peoples of Europe: creating between them an organization putting an end to war and guaranteeing an eternal peace.

    The European spirit signifies being conscious of belonging to a cultural family and to have a willingness to serve that community in the spirit of total mutuality, without any hidden motives of hegemony or the selfish exploitation of others. The 19th century saw feudal ideas being opposed and, with the rise of a national spirit, nationalities asserting themselves. Our century, that has witnessed the catastrophes resulting in the unending clash of nationalities and nationalisms, must attempt and succeed in reconciling nations in a supranational association. This would safeguard the diversities and aspirations of each nation while coordinating them in the same manner as the regions are coordinated within the unity of the nation.’

    The EU is not perfect but it has curbed the rise of extremist nationalists movements in member states. It is not popular in Ireland now, but look at the road signs, public development and local initiatives and see how many of them came about through EU funding. Look at the initiatives for stability in the north. Think of all the personal liberties safe-guarded under EU legislation that our own political parties might otherwise overlook. Rather than kick the Union when its down, I’m glad it is here and that I am in it. Following the failure of the economy in Greece, we are seeing a massive upswing in support for right-wing extremist groups. That is exactly what the original concept of European unification was intended to prevent and why we all lose if the ‘experiment’ fails.

    I don’t have a damn problem with what Robert Schuman said in 1949 and if these principles and ideals are acknowledged, even belatedly, I won’t be taking issue with that.

    Reply
    • Good post Sarah. Sadly many people have short memories. Despite the economic turmoil, we have no idea what real poverty is in Europe. And thankfully few of us know what life during wartime is like. Talk to your grandparents and ask them what life was life was like 60 odd years ago. The EU’s success will be short lived if the lessons of the past are forgotten. He who does not examine his past is doomed to repeat it. The rise in nationalism across Europe is a real worry.

      Reply
    • Great quote, I’ll be stealing it :)

      Reply
    • Yeah the EU is great when things are running relatively smoothly but it seems as though it’s a different story when things take a turn for the worse!

      Reply
    • @jack the rise of nationalism across europe is a good thing.our cultures & history are so different.

      Reply
    • Sarah do not forget Romes contribution to European culture this is too often underemphasised without the church’s influence people would not have many of the freedoms they have to day. Many people forget this .

      Reply
    • @graham. German nationalism never did Europe any good. Protecting cultural diversity is different. The EU has pumped millions into supporting Irish culture and protecting our language. Money our own government wouldn’t have spent.

      Reply
  • Nobel Peace Prize To European Union Is A Political Award according Peace prize winner Mairead Corrigan Maguire http://www.countercurrents.org/maguire131012.htm …

    Reply
    • A kind of ‘Remember why you were set up in the first place” award.

      Reply
    • This award is absolute nonsense. The EU may be preventing member countries to get at each other throats (although the bail-out related bickering is indicative of some divides which never went away) but when it comes to managing conflicts and bringing peace to even the surrounding regions, the EU absolutely sucks. Just remember how the EU handled the largest post-WW2 on the European soil – the Balkans. Absolute rubbish policy response and zero credibility military response. It’s quite easy I guess today to prevent Germany from invading random countries (having said that there is no border with Greece so that must have helped) but when it came to protecting the women and children of Srebrenica and many other places like it, the EU response was embarrassing to say the least. As a European and an EU citizen I am embarrassed with this award.

      Reply
    • Dom,You have a point about the apparent ambivalence to our neighbours plight but the eu has absolutely created peace amongst nations that have traditionally been disposed to war, that achievement can and should never be underestimated . And Ireland can hardly talk about the situation in the Balkans or else where , we play the neutrality card when asked to contribute to a rapid reaction force or to contemplate and military harmonisation , we won’t allow increase to corp tax or allow a financial tax , the latter for reasons I understand but don’t ever underestimate the value of a united Europe

      Card

      Reply
  • mart_n 13/10/12 #

    Next year it’ll be awarded to Russia for not nuking anyone during the Cold War

    Reply
  • Na it should have won the Noble prize for economy ;p The Nobel Peace Prizes are a joke anyway ever since Kissinger got it a few years back

    Reply
  • Paul 13/10/12 #

    Awarding it this ‘prize’ is all part of a PR strategy to justify and continue the criminal bureaucratic and financial appropriation of wealth and power on the continent by a cabal of egregious elitist parasites. Is anyone really buying into the spin?

    Reply
  • A bit like RTE radio being voted the best Radio station in Ireland. LOL

    Reply
  • They had to give it to someone, who keeps the cheque??????

    Reply
  • Maybe the award is meant to distract from the sorry state of affairs the EU is currently in. Nothing but a cynical PR exercise and about as relevant as a car of the year award.

    Reply
  • europes in a mess right now, politically, socially and economically, this award was given to try calm the masses across europe who don’t trust there leaders, the idiots in brussels or the superpower nations to get things right. We couldn’t afford to go to war if we tried were to busy fighting the terrorists known as the bankers right now

    Reply
  • After Kissinger got it it became devalued to point of being an annual ritual of nonsensical buffoonery. They could just as well award it to Daffy Duck now for all the prestige it carries.

    Reply
  • Absolutely not.
    It’s unaccountable, undemocratic and has not brought peace anywhere, several of it’s member states were and are involved in the disgraceful and bloody war on a sovereign state like Iraq, a war based on lies and instigated by their warmongering American allies.
    This award has relegated the once revered peace prize to the division of blue peter badges.

    Reply
  • Definitely should Not have won it. Not have deserving of such an award.

    Reply
  • There’s a war ongoing in Europe at the moment!nA war against the poor.

    Reply
    • Now is not the time for EU back slapping. there has been 20 30 years for this award but not now. Given that Obama won it in 2009 for nothing at all, this award seems to be a political propaganda farce.

      Reply
    • And the church is doing its beat to defend the rights of the poor throughout Europe . However left wing fanaticism thrives under such conditions and there will always be an attempt to keep people in the gutter to further their own cause.

      Reply
  • the REAL question is FOR WHAT???? being in debt, using the money of the people and let them suffer? A union who is about to crash as there is no more blood left in the people? There is def something wrong with how things are seen here – End times really!

    Reply
  • The EU has coincided with, rather than caused, a period of stability in Europe.

    Reply
    • And what caused that stability? Economic growth caused by integration and increased trade between the member state economies. And leaders of the different member states working together rather than stoking up hatred against rival powers.

      Reply
    • “And what caused that stability?”

      The UN? The break up of Germany? Recovery period from the extent of WWII? Memories of the horror of WWII? The escalation of arms? The Cold War? NATO?

      People would rather peace than war.

      Reply
    • Absolute nonsense; there’s plenty of evidence that the EU *HAS* actually prevented the wars. http://t.co/diRjDm1x

      Reply
    • Can someone point out to me what wars the EU stopped, and I won’t accept any answers that suggest peace on the continent is proof they stopped wars, that’s not proof…it’s coincidental and conjecture.

      Reply
    • @Dermot That’s like asking someone to point out the people whose lives have been saved because of road safety measures. You need only look at history to know that close to 70 years of peace in Europe is highly unusual.

      Reply
    • Not really a comparable analogy sorry.
      Road safety measures were specifically designed to cut down on road fatalities, the EEC was designed as a trading entity which morphed into the political machine now known as the EU.
      70 years of relative peace between member states has more to do with economics than the intervention of the EU and bear in mind – the main crux of the war argument is peace between member states disregarding the culpability of the EU in facilitating American aggression and violation of human rights.

      Reply
    • Dermot, there’s all those times where the EU waded in to resolve international disputes between member states … erm …

      Reply
    • The EU was never set up to prevent wars between its member states. It was NATO that was set up for this. EU was all about economics and trying to make a United Nations of Europe, to become a strong player on the world markets.

      Reply
  • well the Irish should love the EU. how often do you see ?funded by the EU development fund? when you go about? Ireland had nothing prior to joining and had been on a daily free ride since

    Reply
  • They’re keeping the peace by battering the shit out of Spanish and Greek protesters… definitely worthy of the Nobel peace prize.

    Reply
  • No.Absolutely not.

    Reply
  • The Norwegians do have a sense of humour …. giving the peace prize to the EU.
    So let the Scanwegians continue their sense of the bizarre to a logical conclusion and grant next year’s prize to their spliff-toking cousins in the freetown of Christiania in Copenhagen.
    Christiania could apply for international sovereignty as that Danish collective, on about 70 acres in central Copenhagen, has maintained borders and self-governance outside of the EU for over four decades – despite fending off junkies, rockers, hell’s angels, biker gangs, crime, police and a hostile authority.
    But instead of warring, well despite the hash battles and police raids on Pusher Street where cannabis is openly sold at outdoor stalls in the hippie town, this self-governing Christiania has given humans a space to work for fraternity between nations, for the reduction and abolition of standing armies, and the promotion of peace congresses, the very criteria that Alfred Nobel awarded his peace prize for, so does reason not dictate that the Norwegians agree that Christiania deserves the Nobel Peace Prize?
    John Life

    Reply
  • If we look at the the peace perspective. The timing of this award is very interesting. Greek Cypriot government is holding the presidency yet they accepted Cyprus as a whole island while ignoring the main conflict between the north and the south. As a cypriot myself , if EU is a peace keeper they should solved the conflict before accepting any unpeaceful member

    Reply
  • It should be rewarded to the church for it is religion that binds people of different language together . Without the church there would be no Europe . All European laws are predicated on Christian values. People often underplay the power of the church and its influence and benefit to mankind.

    Reply
    • On the other hand when they are awarding to the EU they might emphasise that probably the best thing that’s happened with the EU has been the separation of church and state , I for one am very thankful that the church’s power in the past has been greatly dimished , their appalling handling of widespread sexual abuse of young people by hundreds of priests worldwide , the disgraceful protection afforded to nazi murderers after WW2 and the constant preaching of outdated fairy tales is thankfully much in decline and less interfering in all our lives these days.

      Reply
    • Dave Hammond there are no shortage of people like you who would prefer that the church’s good works be written out of history .it typifies the attitude of all left wing atheists. You make grossly exaggerated claims yet you provide absolutely no proof . Why should any one pay attention to your rantings , when you exaggerate all facts to nebulas dimensions . You try to use bullying tactics to subdue people of faith. Sure crimes were committed and mistakes were made , but it is unforgivable that you would smear your vile lies across a billion people . People who are only trying to do the best they can in this life . Your persistent vitriolic attacks make me feel uneasy and remind me of the Stalanist times. Please stop . The faithful will always persevere in the face of resilience . We are righteous by our good actions and god will be our final judge not the likes of you.

      Reply
    • Dave I find it quite flattering that you are stalking me ? I only pray That it’s as inconsistent as the attitude displayed in your posts on the journal.

      Reply
    • You seriously need a reality check , how much proof do you need about paedophilia priests ? Grossly exaggerated ? Really? Exaggerated to nebula dimensions , really , have you read the multiple reports on sex abuse by the church ? It’s unforgivable I’m smearing lies? Well I thought your religion was based on the principles of forgiveness , although its something I don’t seek or elect from the church as I’m not telling any lies. I don’t persistently make vitriolic attacks , and if I remind you of Stalin then I strongly recommend you read up on your history.thanks for your completely misguided ,inaccurate and false comment but really , it would be best if you stop bringing religion onto the forums altogether try styay on topic and away from insults and nasty comments.

      Reply
    • Dave Hammond it’s ok for you to bring your atheistic agenda to the table but I can’t share my religous beliefs . How dare you violate my human rights. You are certainly a fascist . I asked you to present proof here of wrongdoings and your response was to make a vitriolic attack . I acknowledged mistakes were made but only by a minority a fact you keep refusing to acknowledge . Instead you want to label a billion people as criminal who should not have a right to practise their religion in all phases of life. People of belief are here to stay despite your hate. And we will continue to champion the underdog , the poor and innocent whom you and your left wing extremists would exploit for their own political agenda. People are smarter than you think and they can see through your paltry attempt to subdue the truth and the light. I don’t fear you for I find men of your ilk weak in spirit and cowards and do nothing for society but drag it to the gutter. Put to the test your kind will always falter for god is not on your side. May god forgive you for I am finding it very hard to.

      Reply
    • Your type will never win the battle against good . you and your kind will be driven from the earth with the same force that Jesus drove the merchants from the temple . Jesus was the flesh of god made man , he wasn’t a weak man he was a man of strength both physically and spiritually he preached love and forgiveness but not for those who would violate his fathers house. I caution you not to violate his believers and blaspheme our god . Remember we are a billion strong and you are an insignificant one. You walk a precarious path into an unknown forest of many who would wilfully give up their lives to keep the light and the truth of The Lord. We only turn the other cheek until you attack our house.

      Reply
    • Should the European Union have won the nobel prize is the topic. I’m not interested in a bullshit religious debate with you.

      Reply
    • Seriously , you need help.

      Reply

Add New Comment