TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Poll: Should the state and banks be made to pay for reckless lending?

Ads placed in tomorrow’s papers will look for homeowners to take part in a landmark ‘reckless lending’ case. Do you think it’s fair to expect the state and the banks to pay?

UNHAPPY HOMEOWNERS are to be recruited to take part in a landmark legal action against the state, banks and the financial regulator.

Ads placed in tomorrow’s papers will look for a “willing plaintiff”, who has been financially damaged by the reckless behaviour of banks, to take part in a lawsuit.

Do you think that the state and the banks should be forced to pay compensation to people who were taken in by reckless lending practices, and borrowed more than they could afford? Or do you believe homeowners should have to suffer the consequences of their own reckless borrowing?

Have your say.


Poll Results:






Read next:

Comments (20 Comments)

  • Citizens of Ireland should not be held liable for the reckless gambling of privately controlled institutions – i.e. the banks.

    Reply
    • Other Citizens of Ireland should not be held liable for the reckless gambling of other citizens of ireland

      I am a member of the ‘negative equity’ generation but when I got my mortgage I looked at the repayment details and decided that with my current salary, I would be able to pay. I was not reckless and am still paying my mortgage. I decided to sign the documents and no one forced me to sign. For those that did not do the same I dont want to have to pay for them. I have enough to pay for already.

      It is very easy to demonise the ‘privately controlled institutions’ and not so easy to demonise the citizens of ireland

      Reply
    • Except when those citizens also engaged in the gambling and were part of the problem (if they didn’t pay the ridiculous prices then the market wouldn’t have exploded)

      Reply
    • angryzes 23/03/11 #

      Say it, say it already: “The day has passed for patching up the capitalist system; it must go. And in the work of abolishing it the Catholic and the Protestant, the Catholic and the Jew, the Catholic and the Freethinker, the Catholic and the Buddhist, the Catholic and the Mahometan will co-operate together, knowing no rivalry but the rivalry of endeavour toward an end beneficial to all. For, as we have said elsewhere, socialism is neither Protestant nor Catholic, Christian nor Freethinker, Buddhist, Mahometan, nor Jew; it is only Human. We of the socialist working class realise that as we suffer together we must work together that we may enjoy together. We reject the firebrand of capitalist warfare and offer you the olive leaf of brotherhood and justice to and for all.”

      Reply
  • I *didn’t* take out a foolishly large mortgage and I rent. I’d like to own my own place, but can’t right now, as prices are too high.

    I sure as HELL don’t want to see debt relief (essentially free houses) for those who signed up to foolishly large mortgages. That’s monstrously unfair to those of us who did not act recklessly.

    Let the banks take back all the housing. They won’t want it, and the value of houses will quickly drop to what it really ought to be.

    Reply
  • What is Nama?
    A bailout for developers, i.e. Johnny Ronan and other friends of Berti the Cupboard.
    Who is footing the bill?
    The Irish taxpayer.
    Why does the “big guy” get help and the little guy doesn’t?
    Because the ” elite’s big guys1″ plays golf with TDs. Their kids go the elite private schools (funded by Irish taxpayer to the tune of 100 million euro).
    Some of Nama’s biggest debtors are “not co-operating” with poor Frank Daly. These “bold” boys owe 27 billion of loans and Frank wants them to “co-operate” I’d have them “co-operating” from a Tower of London type cell.
    One law for the little guy and another law for the “elite”

    Reply
  • In some cases the only way someone could buy a house was the bank giving them the money. How hard was it before the bubble and how hard is it after the bubble?

    The government was warned of the bubble bursting, the banks new the risks. And those who were renting in an expensive market wanted a home of their own.

    The banks couldn’t give the money away, and they knew the risks better than anyone. Yet the banks still have jobs, and golden handshakes, and bonuses there were agreed on. They get the bailout and keep their jobs, and if they leave after ruining the country, they get a nice payoff.

    Reply
  • The taxpayer should not have to pay for the reckless lending of the banks and the foolish borrowing by some individuals. The only equitable solution is to force the banks to agree a rescheduling of debt with each borrower so that they jointly shoulder the burden. So it might take 40 years instead of 20 or 25 years to pay back the loan. In all likelihood in that time property prices will have recovered somewhat.

    Reply
  • We are the state. Unfortunately, we are also, in some cases, the banks. The people aren’t getting their money back. Thanks Bertie.

    Reply
  • Why should bondholders be burned but not depositors?
    The principle is exactly the same.
    Both are investors in the banks.
    Both are private financial interests.
    Only a hypocrite would argue that one group should be burned but not another.

    Reply
  • for pete’s sake! it’s like those idiots who tried to sue MacDonald’s about becoming too fat from eating their food!

    Reply
  • Gav 23/03/11 #

    The banks are bankrupt anyway, so if enough mortgage holders stopped paying their mortgage, the banks would finally fold and those who can’t pay would be safe.
    I never got sucked into the property bubble so have no axe to grind, and I do ultimately think people must take responsibility for their actions, but, banking cartels are ruining this country and Fiat currency is only a few years from collapse. The dollar is practically useless and the Euro has been on the edge for at least six months. The ECB seems to be at the root of our banking problems, by not paying mortgages our banks cannot pay the ECB which will eventually cut them out of controlling our country. Yes the ECB has helped finance the building of this country but they too have handed out cheap money for too long, they took a risk and the risk didn’t pay off.

    Reply
  • I would say ‘Yes! The banks should pay’ but seeing as we’ve been tied to them and we’ll be picking up the tab I’m very much so against it.

    Reply
  • I voted Banks and State, but I don`t believe the state should pay.
    I think the banks only should pay.
    How many sub-prime mortages given in the US does NAMA own?
    The banks were the last in on the Global pyramid scheme and they got caught.
    Irish homeowners got caught up in the hype, “Everyone is doing it” and unfortunately a lot of them got caught not through any fault of their own.

    Reply
    • No fault of their own ha. There’s a lot of people out there who didn’t borrow a cent from the banks and didn’t feel like jumping on the buy a house bandwagon yet they’re paying for the banks and the people’s mistakes when they had nothing to do with it.

      Reply
    • I am one of those, happily living in my rented accomodation…
      There is no way I am going to blame my fellow citizens for getting caught up in the frenzy. The advertisements were shouting at us, we were idiots if we did not buy now, and while we were at it we`d get two cars, top of the line insurance for the cat, etc etc….
      Unfortunate as it is, we are paying for all those that got involved. That is wrong. The state has responsibilities for its citizens, but should let private enterprise fend for itself.

      Reply
  • A NAMA that helps bailout homeowners that can’t afford to pay mortgages they took out because of rising interest rates and unemployment.

    Talk of Ireland defaulting on loans, businesses being propped up by NAMA.

    Should homeowners default on their mortgages? Puts things in perspective.

    Reply
  • We are the state. If the state has to pay? The banks are nationalised. We own them. We have to pay…

    Reply

Add New Comment