TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

Autumn’s must see political TV: presidential candidate debates

Romney and Obama will go head to head in three prime time debates over the month of October.

File photo of President Bush, candidate Ross Perot and Bill Clinton at 1992 debate
File photo of President Bush, candidate Ross Perot and Bill Clinton at 1992 debate
Image: Associated Press

FINALLY, THE AUTUMN season offers the matchup sure to attract the biggest audience of the US presidential campaign: President Barack Obama going one-on-one with Republican Mitt Romney in three prime-time debates.

Typically the top political draw in the final sprint to Election Day, the debates assume outsized importance this year with the race a dead heat.

The candidates will have their sound bites and rhetoric down cold so any slip or inadvertent move — remember President George HW Bush’s exasperated glance at his watch or Democrat Al Gore’s repeated sighing? — could roil the campaign for days and linger in voters’ mind until November 6.

No wonder Romney spent days this past week at the Vermont estate of former Massachusetts Lt. Gov. Kerry Healey for debate practice sessions; Ohio Senator Rob Portman, played the role of Obama.

The president has had one practice session with Massachusetts Senator John Kerry, the Democrats’ stand-in for Romney, and is certain to have several more before the first debate October 3 in Denver

The second debate, a town hall-style session, is October 16 in Hempstead, NY The final debate, on foreign policy, is October 22 in Boca Raton, Fla. GOP running mate Paul Ryan and Vice President Joe Biden have one debate, October 11 in Danville, Ky.

Incumbents usually are at a disadvantage, defending a record against a challenger critiquing four years of work. Obama will be trying to avoid the fate of Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, who turned in flat debate performances in their first encounters with rivals. In the end, though, it didn’t hurt either one as they both won re-election.

“Debating is a muscle that doesn’t get used very often,” said Alan Schroeder, a journalism professor at Northeastern University and the author of “Presidential Debates: Forty Years of High-Risk TV.” ”Mitt Romney is better toned because he came off 20-plus primary debates. President Obama has not been on a debate stage in four years.”

Debates aren’t like the highly choreographed campaign event or stump speech marked by over-the-top rhetoric. Schroeder said debates require a different dynamic — candidates need to be respectful, differing in opinion but avoiding any impression that it’s personal.

“In 2008, the first debate between Barack Obama and John McCain, one of the takeaways was McCain did not make eye contact with Obama,” Schroeder said. “That came off as rude, disrespectful.”



(Uploaded by tpmtv)

Part of the practice sessions is figuring out when to be aggressive and how to demonstrate leadership. It’s also honing the lines from months of campaign speeches as the candidates get their final opportunities to speak directly to tens of millions of voters.

In the first debate, on domestic policy, Romney and Obama will be armed with competing numbers and visions.

“We will not surrender our dreams to the failures of this president,” Romney told an audience in Bedford, NH, last December. Expect the Republican to point to 23 million Americans out of work or underemployed, a national debt now at $16 trillion and three years of an unemployment rate above 8 per cent.

In a speech in April, Romney sketched out the Republican vision of smaller government, less regulation and a greater role for business.

“Free enterprise has done more to lift people out of poverty, to help build a strong middle class, to help educate our kids, to make our lives better, than all of the government programs put together,” Romney told a meeting of the Newspaper Association of America.

Expect Obama to counter that more than 4.6 million jobs have been created since he took office after recession-driven job losses approaching 800,000 a month under Bush. In his bid to boost the middle class, the president will argue that he’s reduced the typical family’s federal tax burden by $3,600. He also will talk about shared responsibility and a role for government.

“As citizens, we understand that America is not about what can be done for us. It’s about what can be done by us, together, through the hard and frustrating but necessary work of self-government,” Obama said in his convention speech.

Both will be pressed for specifics on their job creation claims. Romney promises 12 million new jobs; Obama the creation of 1 million manufacturing jobs. Neither has said how he would make those jobs happen.

The candidates are diametrically apart on health care, Medicare, gay marriage, immigration and abortion rights — all potential debate issues.

The second debate on October 16 will cover domestic and foreign policy with questions from a group of undecided voters selected by the Gallup Organization. This format that could elicit the unusual and the memorable.

It was at a 1992 town hall debate involving President George HW Bush, Democrat Bill Clinton and independent Ross Perot in which the Republican was caught looking at this watch. His reaction came as an audience member was talking about how much the deep recession had personally affected him. Bush, who lost that election, later said that he was thinking: “Only 10 more minutes of this crap.”



(Uploaded by smotus)

The final debate October 22 focuses on foreign policy, an area in which Obama has received high marks from Americans in opinion polls. The president will offer a spirited defense of his aggressive record in pursuing al-Qaida, the killing of Osama bin Laden and the collapse of Moammar Gadhafi’s government in Libya.

As for his rival, Obama said in his convention speech that Romney and Ryan are neophytes. “In a world of new threats and new challenges, you can choose leadership that has been tested and proven,” the president insisted in arguing for his candidacy.

Obama said Romney and Ryan “are new to foreign policy, but from all that we’ve seen and heard, they want to take us back to an era of blustering and blundering that cost America so dearly.”

Romney has argued that Obama has “thrown Israel under a bus” and has failed to show resolve in challenging Iran and its suspected nuclear weapons program. He likely will talk about his close friendship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as he did in a speech to American Israel Public Affairs Committee conference in March.

“In a Romney administration, there will be no gap between our nations or between our leaders,” Romney told the gathering.

Expect Romney to complain about Obama cuts in projected military spending even though congressional Republicans, including his running mate Ryan, voted for them last year.

- Additional reporting by Michelle Hennessy

Read next:

Comments (25 Comments)

  • I love the one where someone tells Dan Quayle…i knew jack Kennedy and senator your not jack Kennedy.

    Reply
  • I just don’t understand how anyone who isn’t a billionaire can vote for the GOP, they have gone so far right in the past decade that its boarder line lunacy.

    Reply
  • Had the an opportunity to watch both conventions while on holidays. These debates well make for great tv, however, Senator Paul Ryan is a scarily driven individual.

    Reply
  • Read my lips: Romney sucks.

    Reply
  • Timothy Geithner is the president of the USA nevermind these puppets.

    Reply
  • If you’re someone who has to work for a living, then you have no business voting conservative ever!

    Reply
  • Can’t wait to see Romney run rings around Obama. Obama will be nothing without his teleprompter and there is no way to escape his failed record in the debates.

    The VP debate will be even more entertaining, Joe Biden is sure to make a fool of himself.

    Reply
  • John, you have put your finger on it. Were Romney/Ryan elected , it would be interesting to see how Ryan can be locked away. Maybe it is the Ryan is chosen to appease the far Right of the Party , but one would hope he would be a more traditional VP.

    Reply
  • I really hope for the sake of everyone that Romney wins. The world needs America to have a strong decisive president in charge and not the joker Obama who belongs as a presenter on a daytime tv show.

    Reply
    • Romney decisive?
      He has flip-flopped on numerous stances in the past years.

      Reply
    • Romney decisive?

      Are you for real or completely blind to his actual voting record?
      He’s done more flip-flops than any single recent Olympic gymnastic!

      LOL
      Talk about being conveniently blind!

      Reply
    • ignore her Brian she hasn’t a modicum of intelligence just a troll.

      Reply
    • @ Les Rock

      That and/or she is as uneducated as two short planks!

      Reply
    • It makes me laugh to see the idiotic Obama supporters out in force in this country. They probably only love him as he had a pint in Offaly. Or is it because of his colour and you feel better for supporting the black man? Because its sure not because of his political record. So many stupid and gullible people.

      Reply
    • It makes me laugh to see the idiotic Obama supporters out in force in this country. They probably only love him as he had a pint in Offaly. Or is it because of his colour and you feel better for supporting the black man? Because its sure not because of his political record. So many stupid and gullible people.

      Reply
    • Margaret,

      I have big issues with Obama, he has failed on a lot of his “change” he campaigned for. He’s still naïvely thinking he can get a bi-partisen congress, and he is still willing to compromise dramatically for the Republicans.

      But you put him up against Romney? Wow you’d be a fool to vote Romney. Romney is for the RICH! And doesn’t give a damn your every day citizens. His VP Paul Ryan, was an avid follower of the teachings Ayn Rand (look her up). These people are out to screw the average citizens to make sure that the corporate machines make as much money as possible and damned be the consequences.

      Obama is the lesser of two evils here Margret.

      Reply
    • @ Jake Behan

      Well said Jake – but the troll doesn’t get it – or wants to!

      Reply
    • Spot on Margaret!

      Just a few truly startling FACTS and figures from Obama’s first (and hopefully last) term in office.

      Unemployment when he took office was at 7.8% Now 8.1%
      Median Household Income: Then $54,983 Now $50,964
      Gasoline/Gallon: Then $1.85 Now $3.78
      National Debt: Then 10.6trillion Now 16trillion.
      (Sources: US Department of Energy & US Treasury)

      The jobs report today showed that in the month of August there were onl 96,000 jobs created while the unemployment percentage dropped from 8.3% to 8.1% because approximately 400,000 stopped looking for work altogether. That means 4 times as many people gave up looking for work as to those who got jobs.\

      More American’s are living below the poverty line than ever. 45 Million people now receive food stamps (thats 15% of the entire population), 11 million people receive disability benefits (half those people receiving the entitlement signed on during Obama’s first term.

      You call people who support Romney or the GOP insane but looking at those FACTS how can any sane person suggest Obama deserves another term?! He has run out of ideas and now he is running out of time.

      Reply
    • @ Cian Doherty

      Maybe if the traitorous Republicans hadn’t blocked everything under the sun from the mid-terms onwards, more “change” would have come:

      Blocking you say? What blocking?
      well how about this lot to begin with: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=80554062&postcount=106

      One example? A work bill Obama tried introducing. Let not use my words though – lets us read someone more close to home, The New York Times instead!

      The bill the Republicans shot down is not a panacea, but independent economists say it would have a significant and swift effect on the current stagnation. Macroeconomic Advisers, whose forecasts are often used by the Federal Reserve, said it could raise economic growth by 1.25 percentage points and create 1.3 million jobs in 2012. Moody’s Analytics estimated new growth at 2 percentage points and 1.9 million jobs. Those economists say that Republican ideas for increasing growth would have no measurable effects in the next year.

      The Republicans offer no actual economic plans, only tired slogans about cutting regulations and spending, and ending health care reform. The party seems content to run out the clock on Mr. Obama’s term while doing very little. On Tuesday, Mr. Obama’s campaign manager, Jim Messina, accused Republicans of trying to “suffocate the economy” in hopes that the pain would work to their political advantage. They are doing little to refute that charge. LINK

      Think about that…

      They are willing to DO ANYTHING (even if it means the American people have to suffer more than they have to) to get the White House!

      Now ANY party that would behave like that for selfish reasons, does’t deserve to look at the White House, never mind be in it!

      Disgraceful and frankly indefensible!

      https://bigginsblog.wordpress.com/2012/09/03/how-obama-was-screwed-from-day-one/

      Those are the VERY facts – and reality!

      Reply
    • Want more facts?

      When we compare Obama’s numbers to George W. Bush’s. In Bush’s first term, the economy shed 913,000 private sector jobs! 913,000!

      Under Obama – before the Republicans gained back a majority and maliciously blocked all they could, Obama CREATED 35,000. That’s the net number of private sector jobs created during the Obama administration to date.
      http://www.salon.com/2012/05/04/bush_vs_obama_jobs/

      …But what about poor old Mitt?
      For 11 of Romney’s final 13 months in office, Massachusetts had a higher unemployment rate than the national average. It was the same rate (4.6 percent) when Romney left office in January 2007.

      Don’t let truth come in the way of good Republican fiction and spin! Eh?

      Reply

Add New Comment