TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 17 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Column: Breivik’s victims have been largely forgotten during his trial

The 22 July 2011 attacks could have happened here, writes Ciara Galvin, and could still happen.

Ciara Galvin

I WAS PACKING when I heard.

A gunman had walked onto Utoya and was murdering our comrades in the Norwegian Labour Youth summer camp. Details were sketchy as they emerged – there was one gunman, there were two. He was Islamic, he was a policeman, he was white and Norwegian.

His name was Breivik. Slowly the death toll crept up – 20 were dead, 30, 40. 50 were dead, more missing.

I had been packing to attend IUSY, the international equivalent of the Utoya camp. I called our International Officer who was organising the trip and cried, a lot, down the phone. He hadn’t heard from IUSY and he didn’t know if the camp was going ahead. I finished packing and the next morning set off for Austria.

By the time I arrived there, two days after the attacks, Breveik’s face was splashed beside Amy Winehouse’s across the front page of all the newspapers. They were saying she had died of an overdose, and he had links to Austrian neo-Nazis. The speculation about possible copy-cat killings was not exactly consoling, but it was far too late to turn back. It could have been bravery or stupidity, but almost 2,500 of us turned up for IUSY despite the attack. By rights, the AUF (Norwegian Labour Youth) should have been there with us, understandably they were not.

Though I have met members of the AUF since, today was the first time that I have seen all the faces of Breivik’s victims and heard a roll-call of their names. We have heard so much about Breivik in the coverage of his trial – his motives, his actions, his sanity and even how many hours he spent playing video games as “target practice” – that I think his victims have been largely forgotten.

So, I have asked that a link to the video of them be provided below:


YouTube:

I didn’t know at the time, but it could have been us. We could literally have been there at Utoya. I heard several months later that invitations had been extended to Labour Youth, and it was only through mishap that we did not receive them.

It could have happened here either – could still happen. An Irish malcontent like Breivik could have walked into the Tom Johnston summer school a few weeks earlier and taken out a bunch of Labour Youth members. The idea of losing friends this way – any of them, but especially close ones – is painfully hard to think about.

People involved in politics in Ireland are often subject to derision and vitriol. Sometimes more deservedly than others, and sometimes more hurtfully than others. But I need to believe that most people who say we should all be shot don’t mean it. They may mean it in the instant that they type it, they may mean it over a few pints with friends, but they don’t mean it enough to stock up on guns, ammunition and explosives, and then murder us in cold-blood.

Breivik has stolen 69 young activists, from the AUF, from us and from the world. He’s been locked up, thankfully, with the prospect of never being released.

There are still people who share his views out there though, and sometimes I reckon there may perhaps be a bit of Breivik in everyone. All we can do however, to avoid becoming Breiviks ourselves, is follow the example of the Norwegians and meet terrorism and extremism with more democracy, rather than less.

It can be difficult to remember when nothing would give greater satisfaction than physically wiping the smirk off Breivik’s face, but if we can manage it – and I think we must – then perhaps we are a little bit closer to building the vision of a fair and equitable world that Breivik’s victims died for sharing.

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (18 Comments)

  • Don’t forget the eight people killed in the Oslo bombing also. 77 people died in total that horrible day.

    Reply
    • medred 25/08/12 #

      They were not associated with labour, thus less tragic

      Reply
    • Ciara 25/08/12 #

      That’s a fair point Ryan, and Breivik’s 8 victims from Oslo are remembered in the video. I was writing from a personal perspective and so focussed on the AUF activists, but the Oslo bombing victims are no less important.

      Reply
    • I really can’t take her seriously with lines like, “Breivik has stolen 69 young activists, from the AUF, from us and from the world”, he took 69 young people from their parents, us and the world, that’s a tragedy whether they were socialists, liberals, conservatives or compleatly apolitical.
      Thought out the trial the victims and their families were foremost in everyone’s mind. The writer seems to be creating a false dichotomy that it is either Breivik’s ideology or her own.
      What happened on Utoya Island and in Oslo was a human tragedy and should not be used by any one for political capital.
      Hopefully, with the trail over and Breivik sentenced, the families and Norway will be able to find some closer and slowly return to normality.
      Breivik will never be released from prison and will become like Rudolf Hess, a man idolised by a hateful, bigoted few but to the rest of society, he will be seen as a murder driven by a destructive ideology who serves only to remind us that the cost of freedom is eternal vigilance.

      Reply
    • Absolutely no need to debate this. Obviously every death that day was tragic, but for members of Labour Youth we have an affinity to the 69 young activists on Utoya. We shared a common vision for a more equal society, that vision is why Breivik targeted them. Most of us were completely distraught that day and its really not appropriate to suggest Ciara is trying to gain political capital. Its a disgusting thing to say actually.

      For us in Labour Youth, we’ll always remember why our comrades were killed like this and we’ll continue to flight to make that equal and hate free society they dreamed of a reality.

      Reply
    • medred 26/08/12 #

      How exactly has Labour made Ireland a more equal society?

      Reply
    • I can’t believe in some of the comments here, especially medred’s… You can hate Labour, for sure it’s your opinion but I do not think it’s the right page to express your ‘hate’, there are so many pages about economy and/or politics under this portal, if you want to criticise Labour or any party go to those pages.

      Reply
    • Ciara, I would take issue with you . Any human would see this as a travesty on people by a man, who though legally sane, committed an mad crime. Therefore , our first thoughts are with the victims. I feel you are understating the human element all right thinking members of society feel.

      Reply
  • Interestingly the Intl Herald Tribune takes the opposite view, saying that the Norwegian trial system allowed for a more revealing & personal understanding of the victims than many other legal processes.

    For example, each victim was named in court with a photograph, 1m video and a biography read out to court that included details of the plans for future life.

    Reply
  • Well done Ciara

    Reply
  • Well said Ciara

    Reply
  • Well done Ciara, brilliant article!

    Reply
  • Z? 05/09/12 #

    Reply
  • I think its fair to say that nobody can think of a just punishment for him. Anything penalty is always going to be inadequate in the face of such horrific mass murder. But I take comfort that some day call it what you like, Karma, God, Destiny he will pay a price that will truly justify the loss he has inflicted. He will spend an eternity in view of the loss and misery he has caused. I believe that and no human punishment will equal what he will have face when he meets his maker.

    Reply
  • 21 years in prison is a terrible sentence ! Imagine with remission he will be out in possibly 15 and free to do the same again !

    Reply
    • He won’t. 21 years is the minimum; there’s an allowance to designate a longer term in Norway, and it would be a very unpopular government who won’t use it in fifteen or twenty years time.

      Reply
    • But he won’t. When he applies for parole he won’t be granted it. At the end of his 21 year sentence, if he is deemed to still be a danger to society, he will be kept in jail. State prosecutors have said that he will be kept in jail long after 21 years. Strange judicial system but if it keeps such a sick man locked up I’m all for it.

      Reply
    • Ailing you are factually incorrect. The min is 10 years but under the Norwegin code , time can be added on.

      Reply

Add New Comment