TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Column: Kids are going to destroy the internet. Here’s how it’ll happen.

Think Silicon Valley will shape the future? You’re looking in the wrong place, writes tech entrepreneur Dylan Collins.

Dylan Collins

I OCCASIONALLY DO a little bit of speaking, and afterwards the most common question I get asked is ‘do you really think Facebook will be around forever?’

People ask me this with a strange, almost excitable glee in their eyes, as if they’re convinced that Facebook is about to collapse at any moment. I generally whisper back conspiratorially “You know, I think there is a threat looming on the horizon”.

This is often enough to send them into paroxysms of delight and frequently an actual hopping-up-and-down motion. “What is it?” they gurgle.

“Kids,” I reply, which inevitably has the impact of a large stone wall on a fast moving custard doughnut.

“Whuuuh?”

The under-13 generation is the fastest growing segment of users on the Internet. Kids under the age of nine are going online at least once every two days. That’s an official figure although I imagine any parent reading this will recoil in laughter at how much of an understatement it probably is. Especially if your three year-old has already blown over a grand buying games on the App Store as one executive recently confided to me.

This under-13 group is the first generation to grow up with immediate access to the Internet. They touch and swipe where we simply watch. All sorts of catchy yet terrible monikers suggest themselves. I once saw somebody declare mid-lecture that they were the ‘touch-kids generation’ until his brain caught up with what his mouth was saying, and he changed his mind.

‘Your kids, nieces and nephews will be the harbingers of disruption’

Whatever you choose to call them, your kids, nieces and nephews will be the harbingers of disruption across every category. Everyone talks about the influencers in Silicon Valley. The Robert Scobles, the Dave McClures, the Mike Arringtons, the Sarah Lacys. You should really be paying attention to the Brandons, the Tiffanys, the Haleys and the Ryans. They’re going to have far more impact than their dimunitive 10-year-old frames might suggest.

Take the multi-billion-dollar toy industry for example. Today, global brands are being created not by toy designers but instead by online games which have been pounced on by millions of kids. Club Penguin was acquired by Disney for over $700million a few years ago. No toys, no TV series, just an incredible concentration of under-sevens.

Look at Moshi Monsters. The virtual world for girls now has over 50million users across the UK and US. In about four years, it’s grown from an online game to one of the biggest kids’ brands in the world. Estimated value? Maybe half a billion dollars, according to industry estimates.

Slightly more anecdotal although no less impactful, is the role kids have had in the success of Angry Birds (if only because your five year-old downloaded it ‘for you’). Publisher Rovio is valued in the billions of dollars.

Stardoll has now launched a line of girls’ clothing with JC Penney. It began as an online dress-up site.

‘There will come a time when some future Michael Bay will be working his magic with Angry Birds or Club Penguin’

These brands have to all intents and purposes been created by the direct activity of the under-13 generation. Remember Transformers, Barbie and Lego? Well, there will come a time when some future Michael Bay will be working his magic with Angry Birds or Club Penguin as ‘a reimagining of a classic brand’. Trust me.

How does this tie back into the fate of Zuckerberg’s creation? For all the immense value and utility which Facebook, Twitter and Tumblr have created, the vast majority of under-13s don’t really give a crap. Certainly up to the age of about ten, the most influential generation the world has ever seen doesn’t care about your Facebook status. Or your hilarious FakeLambShank twitter account. Hell, they don’t even bother with email most of the time.

The speck on the horizon I mentioned earlier? It’s not the possibility that this generation won’t care about networking and communicating (they will) but that in the same way they turned tiny online games into global brands, they might possibly just choose something else instead. Or, even more intriguing, they might create their own.

Movements like Coder Dojo are hacking the education system and teaching kids how to code and create games and applications. Jordan Casey and PizzaBot is only the beginning. I’d be pretty scared if I was a primary school teacher right now. Your students are going to be running online rings around you, Miss.

Ten years ago I said that gaming would become the biggest entertainment industry in the world. I was met by general mirth from investors. Keep an eye on your kids – they’re probably going to be the next big thing.

Dylan Collins is executive chairman of Fight My Monster and chairman of Treemetrics. He has previously co-founded a number of tech startups including Jolt Online, DemonWare and Phorest.

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (23 Comments)

  • bob 15/04/12 #

    I’m 38 and miss the day I would say to my friends on a Sunday night,I’ll see ya nxt Friday.no mobiles,FB or anything unless ya bumped into them in the street.ya got on with it.things change as they do and I have run with it with this addictive Android device but the kids are nonplussed with this amazing teckno stuff.ah well,its nice to go fishing and turn it off.bit of quiet every now and then is good for the noggin.

    Reply
  • It’s the kids jobs to take over everything, we are just holding on to technology until they get here.
    I think it will only get better if you move with it. Personally I think the simple parts of the Internet are the best, like when you get a new phone you put your email address on it and all your contacts and calendar details come back. How can that be bad.

    In saying that, I would love to bring my kids back to when I was 10 just for 1 week just to show them how far we have come.

    Reply
  • Destroy the internet? Eh?

    Reply
    • Yeah, the headline doesn’t reflect the content of the article in the slightest! Far from destroying it, the writer explains how they will alter it by the “disruption” of “categories”. I don’t think the fact that kids aren’t bothered with Facebook or Twitter can act as an indication that either will be closed for business any time soon, kids are using the net for games and purchasing the related toys – this is hardly surprising! It’s when the under 10s grow up that it will be interesting to observe what their mode of online interaction will be. Facebook / Twitter or as the writer says, something new that they have created themselves

      Reply
  • I just hope some of those kids are also already working on alternative power sources, as we may already have reached peak oil, and if not, soon will, and need a lot of creative thinking and designing to provide a smooth transition to a differently powered society.

    Reply
  • It’s so true, were grown-ups have learned to type and use our pc with keyboard and mouse our kids are interacting with touch screens and Wii style movement sensors. Not only will they decide the future they will also decide how we interact with our devices.

    Reply
  • Korea had embraced technology and Internet with both hands while we live in the dark ages with slow or no broadband more concerned with restricting and censoring the Internet.
    The future for ireland is to be the country developing applications & games software etc. generating wealth and jobs as technology and demands change fast it’s generates more need and demand for better newer technology. Win win for all those in loop.

    Reply
  • My little hacker is 9 now, gave up club penguin when he was 5 cos it was ‘for babies’ and loves the coder dojo! And has my laptop jacket to bits. Also has numerous handles depending on what he’s playing online, this is the future!! And I welcome it….

    Reply
  • “Ten years ago I said that gaming would become the biggest entertainment industry in the world. I was met by general mirth from investors.”

    He must have been speaking to some pretty stupid and now unemployed investors. Gaming was always earmarked for dominence, thus they did get the investment to bring them to where they are today.

    If anyone’s interested the fastest growing demographic on Facebook are the middle aged. And that’s where it’s future lies. I don’t think kids will ‘destroy’ the internet, but they’ll defintely shape it’s growth and create its own niche as the author suggests, but it’s no different to when TV Stations focused on suppling glitzy rubbish at peak times for the under 13s to maximise commercial oppertunities.

    Reply
    • Gaming was never, ever ‘earmarked for dominance’. When Everquest was at 250k players, everyone (including most of the games industry) was adamant that it was as big as the market could support. Now that we see games like Moshi and titles from Zynga with in excess of 60 MILLION players, it’s easy to think that no other attitude could ever prevail but it really did.

      Also, in terms of the future lying with the middle-aged, I think you possibly missed out a rather critical biology class…:)

      Reply
    • Dylan, I think he clearly said the middle aged (my folk) are the future of Facebook, not the internet as a whole. Ie – facebook is a dinosaur with a small bit of life left in it.

      Reply
  • Elmo 14/04/12 #

    I’d say the current “tween” generation have done a pretty good job of destroying the internet. It’s virtually impossible to log on to any social website, facebook, twitter, youtube etc. etc. without being bombardd with Bieber or One Direction or Glee or whatever untalented flash in the pan is current flavour of choice.
    Look at the Trends on twitter for example. Designed as a way of seeing what people were talking about, and started out as a pretty accurate device. Now they’re taken over with deliberate trends, most of which aren’t even discussing the topic in question, but are just whatever the hashtag they’ve been told to trend is.
    The “touch kids generation” are welcome to the internet, or the social media side of it at least.

    Reply
  • Internets within the internet

    Reply
  • @Jason Walsh – Integrated technology from birth? Scary thoughts there…..We are Borg!

    Reply
  • Only a matter of time until we have a compact smart communication device integrated into us from the day we are born. No more learning in the traditional way we’d have info on any topic on demand. Social networking will have instant updates and sharing beyond the wildest dreams of Mark Zuckerberk.

    Reply
  • Instant will be the future, nobody will be interested in hearing about stories a couple of hours old, never mind yesterday.
    Young people will always be into the happening now trend, fashion, pop etc.
    Twitter is certainly getting there, and nothing is worse on Twitter than someone tweeting yesterdays news.
    Games will become realtime and interactive and immersive, eg your home game box will stream the live football game or F1 race, and let you play within it.
    There’s no point in us now trying to prevent the internet becoming something, as it’s still too young, like the early movies prior to talkies.
    Woe to any person, or country that does not fully embrace the technology that’s coming, they will be left behind.

    Reply
  • Moshi Monsters, the virtual world for _girls_? Our Oisín will be over to you shortly to kick the crap out of you with his Skylander. Moshi is his and his buddies Facebook.

    Reply
  • I believe that the biggest change that will be achieved by the games mentioned in this article is one of payment for social networks. Whilst twitter and Facebook have no subscription (as such) club penguin, moshi monsters, etc have very effective subscription models. I believe my kids will have an expectation of payment for their social networks as a result of this. Im not suggesting this is underhanded; rather this will become the natural consequence. The person who hits the zeitgeist for a social network that achieves a subscription will have enough money to make sucker burg their butler.

    Reply
  • Good article. Still don’t like Dylan Collins though even though I do admire him.

    Reply

Add New Comment