Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
Read Me
Extract The 'daily problems' in maintaining Ireland's neutrality during WW2
Confidential documents from the 1940s show that the maintenance of Ireland’s neutrality was going be difficult – and hard decisions on policy would have to be made practically every day.
7.00pm, 20 Jul 2013
1.2k
45
In a memorandum from Michael Rynne, the Legal Adviser for the Department of External Affairs (1939-50) to Joseph P Walshe, the Secretary to the Department of External Affairs, the issue of how to safeguard Ireland’s neutrality is discussed. The report was marked “Most Secret”.
IT IS BECOMING increasingly obvious that the maintenance of our neutrality is going to involve us, practically every day, in difficult decisions of policy. I have been considering one such ‘daily problem’ since yesterday. The legal answer to that problem is, as usual, quite easy to find. But, if we want to stay out of war, we must not tie ourselves to the strict law, and yet we cannot embark with safety on a policy of applying the law to one belligerent and waiving it in favour of another.
What are the essential facts of our position?
Although the question-mark is only too evident, one may hazard the following reply:
a) we represent at least one State of the Commonwealth which does not believe in the righteousness of Britain, of which British propaganda is trying to convince the world;
b) our neutrality may inconvenience Britain’s blockade policy;
c) our neutrality, preventing the stampeding of the population into the British block, may be hoped to serve as a slight distraction to a belligerent Britain.
Between thirty and forty persons were killed and many more injured in a bombing raid on Dublin May 30, 1941 . Damage as widespread dozens of houses and many other building demolished, investigations proved the bombs dropped were of German origin. The Eireann government protested to Berlin. Rescue workers among the scattered debris of bomb wrecked buildings in Dublin. (AP Photo)
The British are resigned to our neutrality
Of these three reasons, I think that reason a) is self-sufficient. The moral effect of our declared neutrality is worth so much to Germany that she will not want to disturb our status quo. The British are resigned to our neutrality on certain terms. They know that, if we were not neutral to a fairly considerable extent,
encouragement would be given to the pro-German element here which might eventually carry the day. To prevent such a possibility, Britain would have to ‘lend’ us troops that she could ill afford. How much better to let the country be held ‘benevolently neutral’ by an Irish Government plus a small Irish Army and Police. Should those means fail, the matter can always be reconsidered;
a neutral island (whose neutrality has been promised respect by Germany) just next door has its advantages for Britain as an evacuation area, base hospital and centre of espionage, or, perhaps, counter-espionage;
if we went ‘loyal’ to all appearances, we might be expected to insist on our pound of flesh in Ulster at a very awkward time. That might mean 1914 and 1916 all over again. ‘The Irish cannot be trusted’ – ‘The Irish will always have a grievance’.
Neutrality suits both belligerents
To conclude, given that the above premises are all fairly well-founded, we may take the view that our neutrality suits both belligerents at the moment. The Germans are so pleased that they have promised to recognise the status we have assumed, but the British are holding back for terms. In parenthesis, it may be remarked that neither belligerent is in the least likely to respect our ‘neutral rights’ in practice – but there we will be no worse off than any other small neutral country.
Advertisement
The main problem, therefore, that appears to confront us now is not a day-to-day problem (such as the ‘Cabot’ messages), but the question of what terms we will concede to Britain for what quid pro quo. This may not be realised as yet (which is the reason for this note) by our Government; it is, however, fully appreciated in Great Britain. By conveying the impression that they are ‘disappointed’ by our attitude to the present war, the British are succeeding in conveying a menace to our integrity.
Yet, it is clear, by hypothesis, that our attitude suits them just now. Why, then, do the British pretend to resent our neutrality, as exemplified by their reception of our recent Aide-Memoire?Admitted that Irish neutrality and the Aide-Memoire represent a technical breach in the moral solidarity of the Empire, does not the real reason of Britain’s lack of cordiality lie in her determination to extract good ‘terms’ from us?
Homes on the North strand wrecked by German bombs in Dublin, May 30, 1941. (AP Photo)
Need for formal recognition
The suggestion made here is that we stiffen up our give-and-take policy at once vis-à-vis the British. We know they are prepared to recognise our neutrality, therefore, should we not initiate at once a plan to obtain that recognition in formal terms precisely as we were accorded it by the Germans? It would seem not only absurd but distinctly dangerous to concede to a belligerent, whom we regard as a potential invader and who refuses to recognise us as a neutral country in a formal way, special privileges contrary to every ordinary rule of international neutrality law. But, granted a formal recognition such as the Germans gave us, the position might be different. We would be safer from invasion, inasmuch as Britain would find it harder to justify the invasion of a country whose neutrality she had agreed to respect.
The object is worth struggling for. The struggle might begin now with a stiff refusal to permit the ‘Cabot’ to use the Foynes radio station for un-neutral purposes, and might be followed up by a strong complaint against such incidents as the newspaper interview of the British airmen who landed on our waters.
That incident can only be interpreted as an attempt to embroil us with the Germans, thus destroying our neutrality and landing us into the war. It was a complete let-down of the give and take policy – ‘perfidious Albion’ at her worst. How can the Government possibly be expected to be helpful at the present critical time (when the Treason Act is being availed of) if the British do not take Irish neutrality more seriously than that?
The best and, indeed, the only solution from every point of view is that the British recognise and publish their recognition of our complete neutrality forthwith. We will then consider ways and means of co-operating as far as we can within the limits of technical neutrality. Otherwise, it may not be possible to guarantee a peaceful Ireland, so essential to Britain’s immediate future.
This report is taken from the sixth published volume of Documents on Irish Foreign Policy (DIFP) online is a dark read, where the threat to the relatively new Irish state’s independence was imminent and over-powering. The series, produced by the Royal Irish Academy with support from the Department of Foreign Affairs and National Archives of Ireland, offers a unique insight into the outlook and mindset of diplomats and the Irish government during Ireland’s first international crisis as an independent nation. The volume is edited by Dr Michael Kennedy. For more information about upcoming document releases follow @DIFP_RIA on Twitter.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
@Declan Lyne: you’re probably right. 1% of flyers were responsible for 50% of air travel carbon emissions in 2018. 90% of the world population didn’t fly at all in 2018.
Might be good to tackle the low-hanging fruit first: private jets, domestic flights and routes for which easy and affordable alternatives are available.
Tradable flight credits have been postulated, which would put the burden on those who fly a lot and might be profitable for those that fly very little. However, difficult to figure out how to implement such a system.
@Garreth mc mahon: correct. They’re banning domestic flights to places that have good rail connections. I’d see the EU doing something similar in the future for continental Europe.
@Urban Living Dublin: Funny how yourself and some of the others seem to think trains are automatically more efficient than aircraft. How much fuel does the train use per person, compared to say a B737-800 (a Ryanair aircraft) per person? The figures for the 737 are as follows: Including the crew carries 195 people which when fully loaded has a range of just under 3200 miles and carries 20 tonnes of fuel. Also remember that the larger the aircraft, the more effecient that figure becomes.
Any one got similar figures for trains so that it can be worked out?
@Urban Living Dublin: Fair point on the Electrical trains, but however, most electric trains are used within city distances, like the DART here, basically places you would never use an aircraft for, and the diesel engines on the intercity/ international routes, which would be more comparable to aircraft usage, so it is not really comparing like with like!
As you probably know, I am biased towards aircraft as I work with them, and the engines of such are getting more effecient with each generation. E.G. the LEAP engines on the current versions A320 AND B737, vs the older CFM56s that were used.
I’m travelling as much as I can before leisure travel is curtailed as I feel that will most definitely happen within my lifetime.
I don’t have kids and I use public transport for travelling to work so I’ll use the carbon credits I save on those two things for my holidays.
And I won’t ever feel one bit guilty having approx 10 flights a year.
It’s cheaper to go on a day trip to London than it is to get the train down to Cork.
@Fi Wyse: 10 flights a year creates far more emissions than you can offset using public transport, since public transport isn’t carbon neutral either and the emissions per person for flying is high. An economy return flight from Dublin to JFK will create 1.7 tonnes of carbon emissions. That one return trip is equal to 170 trips from Navan to Dublin in a pretty regular diesel car. In order to stop climate change, it is estimated that a single person should emit 0.6 tonnes of carbon emissions a year. Yet you are taking 10 flights a year, and even if they are short haul, the emissions will still be very high as take off and landing is when emissions are highest. The reason why leisure travel will be curtailed is because people like you live like the world revolves around you – the wealthy world creates disproportionately high and unsustainable carbon emissions, yet much of this can be curtailed through personal choices. If you were actually interested in foreign holidays, you would use all the days you are having abroad, and then combine them into one foreign holiday, reducing the transport requirements. But hey, at least you don’t feel guilty.
@Joe Vlogs: if you can have a chat with my boss and ask her to let me have have a month and a half off work to travel then I will combine all of my flights into one how’s about that! I guess you know the answer to that one…..
@Chris Byrne: Is that the best you can come up with? A sad attempt to make light of my surname? At least hit me with some of the figures to make yourself look a little bit intelligent! Not very Wyse are you….
@Vonvonic: Stupid comment?? No just honest. I use my car as little as possible, I recycle like a maniac, I don’t treat myself to new clothes unless it’s necessary, reduce, reuse, recycle. I don’t have children, why shouldn’t I go on a holiday? There has to be some joy in life.
I’m afraid I don’t. But given that it’s three years since my last flight out of Ireland and I’m not likely to be going anywhere this year, I don’t feel overly guilty.
The climate change thing is an absolute joke. To mitigate warming, we would have to undertake a type of paradigm change that people are both unaware of and totally unwilling to realise. That includes the greenest of the green by the way. (They’re the worst because they’re just leafy moneyed people who are involved in a charade to make themselves look sophisticated. The fashion industry is one of the worst culprits) We are completely screwed. There is no point in even trying.
Anyone who doesn’t go on a flight because of climate, while China are opening a new coal-fired power plant every week, really ought to try any enjoy life a lot more.
The only people who regret it are those whove been guilt shamed by online virtue signalers who have their own agenda anyway. Don’t be weak hanging fruit, enjoy your holiday.
@Mr_Lover_Lover: Hang on now . So they regret going on holiday because of guilt, but they go anyway because they’re not virtue signallers and also they are low hanging fruit who don’t understand the metaphor. I don’t think I’ve ever seen rationalisation at that level. Makes me think anything can be rationalised. Makes me think that there is no solution to the problem. I need to hear more from you.
@Sean Collins: I think you should do whatever you want. I’m a nihilist.There isn’t a hope in China that we’re going to solve this crises. People are delusional. Have at it horse. Just interested in what “well earned” means in the context of climate change. Purely intellectual. I couldn’t give a shite about the planet.
I goes over to Kerry for my holidays, and sometimes up to Clairw for the bit of fiddle. I ain’t one of those “because you deserve it” drones. So I don’t know..
Cut the global population in half means we can all have twice the carbon footprint whilst maintaining the status quo in respect of damage to the environment. Cut population in half again, and we can have four times the carbon footprint whilst maintaining the status quo in terms of pollution and harmful emissions. The only answer to avoiding future wars, famine and disease is population curtailment. The conversation needs to change…
@Fiona Fitzgerald: you’re simply wrong. The ‘super wealthy’ earn their fortunes on the billions of consumers that they serve. It’s in the interest of big business that the numbers grow and grow and grow. It all culminates in war famine and disease when the planet can not sustain its population. History repeats itself.
@Eamonn O’Hanrahan: We already have a population curtailment program in check, it’s called the 1st world’s 1 child policy. Look it up. You can experience here by such things as creche fees, school fees, hospital bills, combined income families and having a progressive career, etc.. Then there’s all the people that can’t actually conceive, that’s rising too. All these things are taxes on population growth, if don’t believe it have a look at our birth rate, it’s fallen by a third in a decade and it was already less than able to repopulate itself back then, even moreso now. So if the populations in the developed world are already dropping and are being topped up by migration, are you seriously telling me you would support population control of all the countries that have a growing population?
How about we address the other 90% of carbon emissions before we get on to the majority of people going on the odd holiday. These articles are designed to shift the blame for carbon emissions to the average person rather than the corporations. It’s lazy journalism.
No I don’t, I know climate change is the issue of our era and will most likely be our demise but I’m well aware a handful of corporations are responsible for 70 or 80 per cent of emissions ao I won’t be brainwashed into feeling personally responsible for whatever tiny fraction of an impact I have. Don’t drive or drink bottled water and was even a vegan for 15 years so my carbon footprint can’t be that much. Won’t deny myself a couple of flights a year, which are mostly to see my family back where I’m from, anyway. Not random sun holidays.
Nobody should be made to feel guilty over a modest annual holiday. However, it baffles me how many folk can justify several overseas trips a year when they’ve never seen their local park..
Perhaps a type of Air Miles tax would be a sensible solution? The further you travel and the more often you travel within a certain time frame, the more you will need to pay for your fares. Work trips, obviously, would not be included unless somebody was clearly taking the piss… like attending conferences in far flung exotic locations that could be done on Zoom.
‘This could happen anywhere’: Local concerns linger after garda stabbed on Dublin's Capel Street
7 hrs ago
11.2k
Gaza
Canada becomes the latest country to pledge to recognise State of Palestine
37 mins ago
734
As it happened
Hawaii and Japan downgrade tsunami warnings as huge earthquake sparks Pacific evacuations
17 hrs ago
36.9k
31
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 214 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage . Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework. The choices you make regarding the purposes and vendors listed in this notice are saved and stored locally on your device for a maximum duration of 1 year.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Social Media Cookies
These cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 149 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 195 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 158 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 119 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 120 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 51 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 48 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 177 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 78 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 111 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 116 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 51 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 65 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 36 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 122 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 126 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 94 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 67 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 116 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 103 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say