TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Lisa McInerney: The New Rules for women are best ignored

The terrifying ‘How to land a man’ books have dressed their old claptrap up in the language of the interweb – and are a good guide of what NOT to do in the world of dating.

Lisa McInerney

“Men love to buy and sell companies as well as extreme sports like mountain climbing and bungee jumping, while women love to talk about their dates and watch romantic comedies.”

YOU CAN STOP laughing now, because this is not a line from Harry Enfield’s updated Women: Know Your Limits sketch. It’s a line from the very first page of Not Your Mother’s Rules: The New Secrets For Dating, the latest book from The Rules stable, and it’s here to make heartless harridans out of our womenfolk and confused loners out of our men.

Guys, if you’ve not heard of this movement, hold on to your 1950s lapels because this is something else. The Rules is a strict behavioural system straight women must follow to bag themselves a husband. It works on the assumption that bagging oneself a husband is a woman’s ultimate aim in life, and that all men are exactly the same so once she has the correct know-how (which is coincidentally found in a copy of The Rules), she’ll be flying it.

The tenets of The Rules are as follows:

Don’t show interest in him. Men love to be “the aggressor” and showing even the slightest flicker of curiosity will negate his position of power and make him disrespect you. Best to pretend instead that your skin crawls at the mere mention of his name.

In fact, don’t show interest in anything. Women are supposed to be mysterious. What that means is that a “Rules Girl” cannot show any joie de vivre whatsoever. No opinions. No awareness of manly pursuits like sports and politics. No lust for life. No lust for lust. Rules Girls must be nothing but a featureless blob of head-nodding indifference. Men don’t want life partners: they want blank slates they can scribble all over!

“An embarrassment of commandments”

But because “Be a damn robot in a dress” is only seven words long and therefore not lucrative stuff, the authors, Ellen Fein and Sherrie Schneider, have fleshed out their philosophy with a host of daft nuggets for women to pick over. Things like: “Always end phone calls first” and “Dye your hair blonde, you filthy ginge.” Basically, the book gave singletons an embarrassment of commandments to turn them into cold-shouldered, empty-headed ice queens incapable of making eye contact.

But times have changed, and the internet has grown swiftly from something that lived in fat loners’ basements to a massive cultural necessity that – gasp! – women understand and utilise! Ergo, Fein and Schneider decided that bringing out a new collection of rules was a matter of urgency, lest all of these 21st Century geeks die alone surrounded by cats and/or sticky tissues.

And lo, Not Your Mother’s Rules was born, the same old claptrap dressed up in the language of the interweb. Updated rules include not to Friend him on Facebook, not to Follow him on Twitter, and to employ a strict mathematical formula when deducing the appropriate time he must wait before you text him back. Now, instead of ignoring your mark across a restaurant table like a sullen shamus, you can save yourself the hassle of leaving the house and give him the silent treatment online! Success!

It’s really difficult not to take the proverbial out of The Rules and the desperately sad saps who think that acting dead-eyed will pave the way to cuddles on tap. The system is so laughable that it can be difficult to accept that it’s been a massive commercial success (and a global one at that. Because, according to the authors, “guys are the same all over the world!”). And yet it has been, and Not Your Mother’s Rules will sell well too, even if a proportion of those sales is people reading the thing as a delicious horror story.

“Doesn’t it sound utterly terrifying?”

Even more disturbing is the fact that Not Your Mother’s Rules, like The Rules before it, doesn’t hide its sexism under a bushel. On the very first page it tells the reader that “men and women are different… [even though] …you were raised to think that men and women are equal and that women can do anything they want.”

Immediately, the picture is painted in stark monochrome: women are prizes to be won and men are so backwards that they may well be their own missing link. In Fein and Schneider’s world, men are there to be manipulated into opening their homes and wallets, and it serves them right because they’re nothing but brutes who’d crawl over a mountain of fresh corpses for a sniff of something younger and prettier.

Can you imagine inhabiting the same sphere as these Rules Girls? Doesn’t it sound utterly terrifying?

Well, it’s alright, because I think I’ve cracked it. The Rules and Not Your Mother’s Rules and The Rules For Rules Followers Who Don’t Play By The Rules or whatever chunk of horseburger is going to come from Fein and Schneider next… exist purely to keep their readers sad, single, and buying stupid self-help books.

“Sobbing All By Myself at uncomfortable bouncers”

Following The Rules could only win a reader one kind of husband, and that kind of husband is the kind no one in her right mind would want. If, in your area, there isn’t an available double-breasted Neanderthal who doesn’t mind being made feel like pond scum, following The Rules can only lead to stereotypical one-woman ice-cream parties or sobbing All By Myself at uncomfortable bouncers at half three in the morning. It’s a no-brainer, ladies; no matter how desperate you are (and why allow yourself to feel desperate in the first place?), you’re not going to build a fulfilling relationship by using body language that suggests you’d rather drink Dettol than be anywhere close to him.

The intention is clearly to create a situation where terrified thirtysomethings, made vulnerable by their failure to pick up a moneyed masochist, go straight back to Amazon.com and BUY MORE RULES BOOKS! It’s genius, really. If that’s truly the aim of Fein and Schneider, you can’t fault their business model. You can, however, fault them for being truly terrible people.

As for the rest of us, acting like human beings, treating others with respect, and showing interest in the people we are interested in is probably the right way to do it, so please carry on.

Read previous columns on TheJournal.ie by Lisa McInerney >

Read next:

Comments (74 Comments)

  • Oh dear. Cringing.

    Reply
    • I’ve never read The Rules, and this version doesn’t seem like anything I’d buy either. But this article has made me curious! I want to know how bad it is, like when someone spends 20 mins telling you how awful a film is – I have to see that film!

      Reply
  • Us men are simple creatures, don’t confuse us with mixed signals. Tell us what you want from us, it really is that simple.

    Reply
  • vic 28/01/13 #

    No dougal, rule no 1 – i never be yourself around women, that’s just a thing people say.

    Reply
  • Great article, really funny – though worrying that so many have bought the book!!! I remember growing up that everything we read in magazines was directed on how to get and keep a man – with both your appearance and how you act being the top two items on the agenda. I remember things like using a loofah and lemon juice on the rough red skin on your elbows – I kid you not! Unfortunately, young women seem still to be obsessed with the same thing, instead of thinking about themselves and what they want from their lives – teenage girls still seem to have such neurosis about their bodies, and self-harm and anorexia worse than ever – sad. Mind you it’s the unscrupulous marketeers bombarding them with these images while trying to sell them beauty aids that are the problem… Still, when I think about it, it seems to me that people always compliment girls and teenage girls on their appearance (lovely top, your hair looks nice, aren’t you gorgeous, etc) – which must be a huge pressure on them.
    As for romantic comedies, soaps, women’s magazines, those talent shows etc – give me a break! I wouldn’t touch them with a bargepole – they are so moronic – and I don’t really know any women who would…

    Reply
  • Best advise, anytime…………just be YOURSELF.

    Reply
  • Any relationship , newly forming or long established has the potential to harm you , there is always risk involved. So just as in financial matters where get-rich-quick illusions will always attract some , so too the con trick of such “relationship rules”books for our emotional investment. Love yourself first , seek what you need in life from all things including you most intimate relationship and then as best as you can being a flawed human try to do likewise for your partner. They will let you down often and vice versa and when you could sometimes kill each other but yet stay together you are probably set. It is as simple and difficult as that there is no set of “Rules”

    Reply
  • I think I would rather die alone with my cats …..

    Reply
  • > But times have changed, and the internet has grown swiftly
    > from something that lived in fat loners’ basements

    Aww, I miss the good old days… back then this used to be all fire.gifs before it got paved over with CSS and graphic design! I want to burn the internet down with FIRE GIFS!

    Also that book sounds good, where do I sign up for one of those robot women???

    Reply
  • It’s great to here someone speaking out about sexism aimed towards men as well as women for a change, thank you!

    Reply
  • Great article: funny and so utterly true.I think you should take it upon yourself to pen the Anti-rules!

    Reply
  • Basically it’s the old ‘treat them mean….’!!

    Reply
  • BRILLIANT!!!! Pleeeeease send this too the Daily Mail ….although they might all self combust..
    Ah send it anyway..

    Reply
  • It’s PC thugs like you who prevent the rest of us from being able to bag a husband!

    Reply
  • Fantastic article. Funny and amazing insight into the weird and backwards world of the authors and the people who buy their tat.

    Reply
  • if it takes a rule book to have a human relationship . its time give up on it . i am very happy on my own.

    Reply
  • What men and woman want is not so different. And it varies from person to person. And it changes over time. A relationship exists between the TWO people in it so again , returning to the thread origin – a silly book , if either party resorts to pre set “rules” the relationship will fail. LISTEN to your lover. Sometimes easier said than done.

    Reply
  • “Treat em mean, keep em keen…” Rob, you’re doing to women what the Rules advises women to do to men! So maybe it works after all.

    Reply
  • John F 28/01/13 #

    *Shudders*

    Reply
  • good luck, i am now very happy to live alone , forever and a day!

    Reply
  • There ain’t a more surefire way to get a gal all hot and bothered than by lickin’ your lips and callin’ her darlin’. Merica

    Reply
  • little piece of advise for any woman who “wants” to pick up a man. speaking as a man the biggest problem between males and females is communication. women ye need to spell out things nice and simply, if you like someone stop playing mind games and simply talk to them yes i know its the last thing any of these books say but surprisingly enough even the simplest of males will respond to actual talking and making your intention and desires known in black and white. You will find we respond a lot quicker and easier to talking then we respond to any number of indirect mind games. essentially ladies WE TAKE IN INFORMATION THROUGH OUR EARS TRY ACTUALLY APPROACHING AND TALKING TO SOMEONE. its very simply really.

    Reply
  • Wouldn’t say treating them mean but rather less a lapdog that most men seem to be with women these days.

    Reply
  • All fascinating stuff, now
    go make me a sandwich woman….

    Reply
  • Just be yourself and be a complete wank*r it’s never failed me in getting women to be honest. All short term flings /relationships though, which suits me.

    Reply
  • “Treat em mean, keep em keen…” Rob, you’re doing to women what the Rules advises women to do to men! So maybe it works after all.

    Reply
  • Never heard of these titles but is it beyond the realm of possibility that they are actually a bit of a laugh, intended to draw out this type of reaction and not actually to be taken seriously?

    Reply
  • In many species it’s the male who displays, e.g. The amazing Bird of Paradise, the Peacock with his amazing tail, the Peahen is boring looking. In our species it’s the female. You just have to accept it, women are better looking than men and need to look their best, it’s how we evolved. :)

    Reply
    • Eleen 28/01/13 #

      Yeah yeah, you’re just saying that so you men can get away with being lazy :P

      I reckon straight women are of the opinion that men are (or at least can be) beautiful too and secretly wish the world was full of hot guys to drool over.

      Reply
  • The authors sound like a bit of a ‘mé féin-er’…..
    as for Schneider – yikes.

    Reply
  • Oh, it’s just a different kind of pathetic to joyless feminists who turn the whole dating thing into an extension of their own personal neuroses.

    Reply
  • If a non-obese woman cannot get a man in this country it is because they are too picky. Irish women are far more into looks and status then men are despite what they say, All a fella cares about is hes not dating an obese girl or a girl who isnt obviously crazy.

    Woman want the square jaw, athletic body who is 5’11 at least, has permanant pensionable job, has a car, is not “mean” -code for being a sucker and who will be a presentable fashion accesory when her friends visit.

    The Author here should look into ‘Looks’ and ‘Violence’ theory – it would be an eye opnener.

    Reply
    • Are you for real!? So what you’re saying is that skinny women are picky, they all want the tall, square jawed, athletic type with a good job and ‘sucker’ written all over him, oh and he looks good on her arm.
      All larger ladies are all single because who on their right mind would want to go out with someone that’s not a non obese person!
      Look at what you just wrote, read it a couple of times and think about what it says.
      It basically says men are just as shallow and all they want is a sane skinny bird.
      It’s a sweeping generalisation of both sexes and a dumb one at that!

      Reply
    • Not just as shallow, more shallow, their expectations are far higher then mens.

      Reply
    • You know, if women reject you, instead of assuming it’s because you don’t fit into the “square jaw, athletic body who is 5’11 at least, has permanant pensionable job, has a car” category, how about considering the fact that it might because your personality? Personally, I’m not particularly fussed about looks, but I’d run a mile from a guy made a remark as ignorant and seemingly bitter as the one above.

      Reply
    • I’ve always preferred skinny guys. And my partner is disabled and stuck on benefits – I’M the breadwinner..
      Ps, I’m not obese, I’m very slim, and have been informed that Im hot – so stick that in your pipe and smoke it you purveyor of ill considered blanket statements you..

      Reply
    • The truth hurts. personality means nothing, looks are king.

      Reply
    • Maybe to guys.. For women attraction is about more than just looks.. Men are far easier to please as sex is almost a preoccupation. For women – well, lets just say we look for a bit more..
      There’s no such thing as a generally attractive man for women – not everyone likes muscles, not everyone like square jaws – that’s just what the media would have you believe..

      Reply
    • Exactly Shanti, every eye forms their own beauty, I’m by no means gorgeous but I have the most yummy husband for 26 years, and to be honest he’s not George Clooney…so we both think the other is yummy, but sure nobody else would!

      Reply
  • Daniel R 28/01/13 #

    The funny thing is that most women are still as concerned as ever with looking and behaving the right way ( baby faced and submissive) as ever before. Men on the other hand, partly due to having predominantly all women teachers and media/tv influence geared towards girls (iCarly/One Direction/Every other Nickelodeon and Disney tween shows), the macho types have become slightly feminized and the ones who were already more in touch with their fem. side have the assurance by society that’s it’s o.k. and so it flourishes. This is what I believe is in part responsible for evolutionary biologist Steven Pinker’s thesis that despite the apparent rise in violence as portrayed by the media- statistics show that violence has never been at its lowest.
    In my opinion this appears to be positive, but we don’t know what the consequences of loosing that balance are yet- maybe there are none. But it’s little wonder a male teacher is guaranteed first pick over a female teacher- governments have spotted this trend too.

    Reply
    • Daniel R 28/01/13 #

      I knew I’d get red thumbs. What exactly is wrong with what I said? People automatically assume that putting the pieces together is a sexist act. Like I said in my post, I’m completely neutral- I don’t think it’s a good or bad thing, it’s just the conclusion I’ve reached with the facts I’ve observed. I, and other people who have similar theories, could be totally wrong. But this book is clearly not useful in today’s society, and these are the reasons I suggest. When you’re considering any social trend, you have to ask yourself only what the facts are, and not what you want them to be. It’s the elephant in the room, and an interesting topic, that everyone’s afraid to touch on except in universities where it’s not taboo.

      Reply
    • I didn’t give you a red thumb but I was tempted to when you labelled Steven Pinker an evolutionary biologist when in fact he is an evolutionary psychologist.

      Reply
  • “Treat em mean, keep em keen…” Rob, you’re doing to women what the Rules advises women to do to men! So maybe it works after all.

    Reply
  • Any man can also purchase “The Rules” and play the Rules Girl at their own game!

    Reply
  • “Treat em mean, keep em keen…” Rob, you’re doing to women what the Rules advises women to do to men! So maybe it works after all.

    Reply
  • Denis 28/01/13 #

    Men want sex , preferably with an attractive partner and ,to stick around, someone who is interested in some of the same things . From what I can determine, women want security ie access to resources that are likely to stick around & therefore alow them ti comfortably have children and who are also prepared to behave themselves at dinner parties. Period. A bit of a generalisation admittedly but not far off the mark in my opinion.

    Reply
    • Tricia G 29/01/13 #

      That’s not “a bit of a generalisation” that’s a sweeping statement that may be correct in regards to a fraction of women but by no means correct for a large number of them.

      Honestly, when will start judging people by who they are and not limiting them to ridiculous outdated gender sterotypes.

      There are SO many women today that don’t want children and are perfectly happy to maintain themselves financially. Just because you don’t share the same circles with them and don’t appear to be meeting them doesn’t meant they’re not out there.

      And, believe me, women also want sex , with a partner they determine to be attractive and interested in some of the same things. If that’s you’re “understanding” of what men want out of life, I’d be insulted if I was a man. Because like women men also want a vast range of other things, individual to each person, and not specific to their gender.

      Reply
    • Denis 29/01/13 #

      Men certainly want more but what I outlined are at the core, in my opinion. Certainly I am limited, to some extent by women ‘in my circle’ however my opinion is also derived from books, films, conversations , basically being an aware adult observing the behaviour and attitudes of others. I certainly hope and acknowledge that women are also sexual beings however , i believe, the type of woman I depict is far from the small minority you suggest.

      Reply
    • Denis – with respect ( sincere ) it sounds like you have not experienced a long term relationship.

      Reply
    • Tricia G 29/01/13 #

      Yes, I’m sure you’re in a far better position to determine what the vast majority of women want out of life from all your experience reading about and watching about what it is the vast majority of women want out of life.

      Perhaps you should just take every individual as they come and ask them what they want out of life. I suspect they’ve a better understanding of what they want then you. And you’ll also find that they all want different things.

      Reply
    • Denis 29/01/13 #

      There are few more condescending phrases than ‘ with respect’ ….

      Reply
    • Well there you are Denis see how tricky relationships are. We misunderstand each other already.

      Reply
    • Denis 29/01/13 #

      A ‘misunderstanding’ no i think i understand perfectly well. In terms of having a long term relationship, would being married for 22 years qualify?

      Reply
  • Denis 29/01/13 #

    Oh, and by the way , I’m not suggesting that these women’s attitudes and behaviours are right or wrong I’m simply saying that’s what they are. I’m not judging anyone. In my experience single , financially independent females exist in large numbers until they move into their 30′s and a large majority then start thinking of having a family . Then security, through a mans resources becomes a big issue.

    Reply
    • Daniel R 29/01/13 #

      Denis I agree. Some people think that women more preoccupied with frivolous pursuits are the nemesis of the feminist movement. Why is this? If they take joy in makeup and gossip magazines then great, that’s what they enjoy. And being in a public school making these observations everyday, I don’t need to survey every girl to come to the conclusion that the vast majority of girls fall into that category, it’s evident. I just can’t understand how people can pull the wool over their eyes and deny feminine traits- do they think it makes them less dominant? Men and women should be free to act themselves, weather it be sport oriented, fashionistas or what have you, in defiance against the gender role society we have.

      Reply
  • “Treat em mean, keep em keen…” Rob, you’re doing to women what the Rules advises women to do to men! So maybe it works after all.

    Reply

Add New Comment