TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 6 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

South African police claim self-defence after 34 shot dead during mining protest

Police chief says live rounds were used after negotiations and crowd control measures failed.

Striking Lonmin mineworkers amidst tear gas as police opened fire.
Striking Lonmin mineworkers amidst tear gas as police opened fire.
Image: Str/AP/Press Association Images

SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE insisted today that they only fired in self-defence in a clash with striking mineworkers in which 34 people died, the deadliest protest since the end of apartheid.

As images of the gunfire cycled endlessly on television, police chief Riah Phiyega told a news conference that officers only used live ammunition after negotiations and crowd control tactics had failed.

“The militant group stormed toward the police, firing shots and wielding dangerous weapons,” she said.

“Police retreated systematically and were forced to utilise maximum force to defend themselves. The total death (toll) of the protesters currently stands at 34 with more than 78 injured.”

So far 259 people had been arrested on various charges stemming from the clash Thursday at the platinum mine run by London-listed Lonmin, she added. The workers at the Marikana mine were on a weeklong wildcat strike demanding a tripling of their wages from the current 4,000 rand (€400) a month.

Mine Violence

Members of a South African police crime unit investigate the scene of the shooting of miners at the Lonmin mine near Rustenburg, South Africa today. (AP Photo/Themba Hadebe/PA)

A union leader compared Thursday’s shooting to the notorious Sharpeville massacre of 1960, in the darkest days of the apartheid era, when police killed 69 black protesters. It was the deadliest police action in South Africa since 1985, when more than 20 black people were shot dead by apartheid police in Cape Town as they marked the 25th anniversary of Sharpeville.

This time the gunfire came from a mostly black police force, shooting at poor black miners whose living conditions have hardly improved in the 18 years since apartheid yielded to all-race democracy.

“I always thought that the Sharpeville massacre was history and it would never happen again. What we experienced yesterday under the democratic government was similar to Sharpeville,” said Joseph Mathunjwa, head of the Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union (AMCU).

Mine Violence

Striking miners gather on a hillside at the Lonmin mine near Marikana on Wednesday. (AP Photo/Jon Gambrell)

Before Thursday, ten people had already died at Marikana in attacks blamed on rivalry between the radical new AMCU and the powerful National Union of Mineworkers, a major ally of the ruling African National Congress.

The two unions have condemned that violence, denied taking part in the killings, and blamed each other for the troubles.

As the death toll mounted Friday, President Jacob Zuma cut short a visit to neighbouring Mozambique for a regional summit and flew to Rustenburg, the town nearest the mine.

His handling of the unrest could prove pivotal as he tries to tamp out challenges within the ANC to his leadership, ahead of the elective conference in December where he will seek a second term as party boss.

The NUM is one of South Africa’s most powerful unions, having produced several top ANC leaders, including Deputy President Kgalema Motlanthe — seen as a potential challenger to Zuma.

The violence points “to a heated political atmosphere in South Africa that is playing itself out on the ground within the unions,” labour analyst Daniel Silke said. Tensions are particularly high among platinum mine workers, who have watched as several mines shut down this year with companies battling to cope with low prices for the metal, he said.

Mine Violence

Striking mineworkers throw stones as police open fire on striking miners at the Lonmin Platinum Mine near Rustenburg on Thursday. (AP Photo/PA Images)

But for many South Africans, the crucial question will be the police handling of the strike, which they approached in bulletproof vests but without other protective gear, like riot shields.

“It comes down to inadequate training, to too few police dealing with too many people, without adequate protection like shields,” said Lucy Holborn, research manager at the South African Institute of Race Relations. ”In a crowd control situation, police shouldn’t be armed with live ammunition,” she said.

- (c) AFP, 2012

Earlier: ‘Several’ South African miners shot dead by police >

Read next:

Comments (18 Comments)

  • mart_n 17/08/12 #

    It just shows how fcuked up the country is. People willing to have themselves killed or kill others just to be afforded some very basic human rights. It’s a sad state of affairs whichever way you look at it. And still there’s a distinct lack of international condemnation regarding the political system and endemic corruption in SA. If this was happening today in the Arab world, countries and their leaders would be queuing up to lambaste the ruling parties for failing to deal with a problem which has led to so much violence over the last decade or more. I mean you’ve got to laugh at the idea of Zuma saying, without a single hint of irony, that; “we believe there is enough space in our democratic order for any dispute to be resolved without any breaches of the law”.

    Reply
  • Company profit last year 226 million dollars and they pay their employees 400 dollars a month. Disgusting!!

    Reply
  • exactly billy. if someone has a problem with social justice thats completely different matter.

    if someone protests well and good thats the right we all have but if i go down a street with a gun or knife and wun at armed police well i know whats gonna happen.

    Police the world over have right to protect themselves while upholding the laws and thats what they did. to hell with silly talk of aiming for legs or arms you CAN NOT hit a target that small thats moving. Aim for central mass and hope to god you even hit that while its moving

    Reply
  • police have guns to protect themselves when they get attacked.

    Reply
  • If you look at that clip the police officer can be seen actually taking a firearm off one off the wounded/dead protestors.
    I don’t condone the violence. I think the situation could have been handled better but the protesters used lethal force first, and if you believe they all didn’t intend on murder your very naive in the way of the world.
    The police were put in a very serious situation, this is not your local high st brawl. They were outnumbered, confused and afraid for their lives. It is apparent that they were shocked by the result of their own actions.
    The organisers of the protest are responsible for this carnage. They were the only ones who could have controlled that mob. And I probably wouldn’t be far wrong if I thought they were happy with the result

    Reply
  • Video here:
    [WARNING GRAPHIC]
    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bfb_1345136218

    Reply
    • Jays us Tal thanks for the link I hope some of the PC brigade will watch it and realise it was’nt self defence but a massacre. Unbelieveable stuff! R I P to all these poor men

      Reply
    • I watched it and at the start it sure does look like a lot of people running at the police… If they are armed (can’t see in the clip at the start) which reports are saying, then surely the police have the right to depend themselves.

      They can hardly say “Oh shit lads we’ve taken Guns to a Knife/Spear fight, lets ask them to stop running at us until we can knifes/Spears so it will be fair then”

      Reply
    • Al Jazzera show the killing from another angle http://aje.me/S2FEne In it you can see the miners approaching in a menacing way and further on at a union meeting you can clearly see that a large amount of them were armed.

      Reply
  • I was in South Africa last May & it was a good time until my memory was spoiled by the unnecessary killing of 34 people. Why can’t the police shoot at the legs or arms when they should know killing of unarmed strikers would be murder? May they rest in peace.

    Reply
  • Don’t they always claim “self defence”? They’ve learned well from their global colleagues like the Met in london, RUC, Gardai, NYC, LA cops etc…

    Reply

Add New Comment