TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

Fewer British people visited Ireland but rise in European and US tourists in 2012

The Irish Tourist Industry Confederation has said that people in Ireland are taking less frequent, shorter and lower spending trips when they take their holidays at home.

A view of the Cliffs of Moher in county Clare (File)
A view of the Cliffs of Moher in county Clare (File)
Image: Wikipedia via Creative Commons

THERE WAS A fall in the number of British people visiting Ireland this year but the number of visitors from mainland Europe and North America rose according to new figures.

The Irish Tourist Industry Confederation (ITIC) has released its annual figures with mixed bag of results showing overall overseas visitors were the same as 2011 with close to 6.5 million people visiting the Ireland.

That’s still down on tourism levels during the boom with figures also showing that in the peak summer months of July and August arrivals were down 7 per cent and 1 per cent respectively when compared to last year.

The economic turmoil across the water is likely to have impacted on the number of British tourists crossing the Irish sea with 100,000 fewer visitors from Britain this year, a four per cent drop.

But Britain remains Ireland’s largest market for tourists with 2.8 million arrivals this year.

In other markes there was a two per cent increase in arrivals from mainland Europe – almost 2.4 million visitors – and an increase in visitors from North America which saw close to one million arrivals.

This graph from the ITIC shows the number of overseas visitors to Ireland over the past five years, underlining the overall drop in tourism numbers since the financial crisis, although visits from the rest of the world have increased since 2007:

tourism 2012

Click here if you are having problems viewing this image

Domestically the ITIC said that the market performed “reasonably well” given the economic circumstances and poor weather over the summer.

This contributed to less frequent, shorter and lower spending trips by people resident in Ireland who chose to stay in the country.

The outlook for 2013 is positive according to the ITIC with The Gathering initiative identified as having the potential to attract more visits, particularly from the diaspora and an overall increase of 5 per cent is possible, it said.

Read: Ireland tops Fodor’s travel guide list for 2013

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (23 Comments)

  • It cost to much to come to Ireland €3 for a coffee

    Reply
  • British tourists in “we don’t choose our holiday destination based on where the queen goes on a state visit” shocker. While it was great politically I don’t understand how people swallowed this bull about there being a tourism spinoff. Or do some of you consult Michael Ds itinerary when booking your holidays?

    Reply
  • Daithi 28/12/12 #

    Just for the record, I’m living in Norway and a coffee costs on average ?6. Bottle of beer approx ?10. In Ireland you have huge choice in eating and drinking establishments. Green 19 serve great food for ?10 and excellent coffee costs for ?2.50. I think most travellers would consider Ireland quite reasonably priced.

    Reply
  • I am glad to see the rise in tourists from the EU and US, but i must ask the question, were we not promised by FFG/Labour prior to the Queens visit last year, that we would get loads and loads of extra visitors from Britain. They said that spending 22 million on security and slap up dinners was going to be money well spent.
    More FFG/Labour spin. When will it end?

    Reply
    • John 28/12/12 #

      Clearly given the tone of your comment you don’t want more british tourists here? The queens visit was an unprecedented success story and was well over due. Do you not think it was money well spent given the wonders it has done for British Irish relations?

      Our closest neighbours would be more likely to visit if they know they aren’t going to be greeted by the tedious 800 years education that some locals are all to happy to dish out when they come over

      Reply
    • John, what an ignorant comment to make. I have many many British friends (Scotland, English and Welsh). The tone of my comment was clearly meant to reflect that i am spin of the spin that FF/FG/Labour all put on the justification behind spending 22million on the visit. President Obama came and went, and his entire visit cost less than a million. US visitors up … Queen Elizabeth comes, 22 million spent and visitor numbers are down.
      Its a clear reflection on the ability of the three main parties to get value for money. Whats worse, they went on TV, radio etc and spun out to all the people who thought it was an extravagance we could not afford and said that we would get the money back in tourism revenue. How can you not understand that with fewer visitors, its a clear unambiguous mess up.
      I had no problem with the Queen coming over and trying to build on the visits of our president to Britain. It did not need to cost 22 million. This was just a massive photo op for Enda and his cronies. When our president went to Britian, you can be damn sure, the British did not spend 2 million, never mind 22 million on her visit.
      Its was a pure and utter waste of money to satisfy the egos of a few Dail members.

      Reply
    • Very ignorant John it was a good point by cal

      Reply
    • I highly doubt we have to fear that our President or her cousins are going to be blown up if they visit the UK. Bottom line the majority of people approved of this visit. I wouldn’t take Mooney seriously he hates anything American/Western anyways. His Sinn Fein mentality is to be expected anyways.

      Reply
    • Cant compare the two visits. obama visited for a couple of hours and the queens visit lasted over 3 days. The queen visited numerous places in ireland, obama visited two. Also there was a greater security risk against the queen than obama.

      also id say the cost of Obama’s visit was more than a million.

      Reply
    • John 28/12/12 #

      Right cal apologies if I came across too harsh there. Like yourself then I have many British friends having lived there. It mortifies me when they come over and some eejit in the pub hears their accent and, all in the name of banter, decides to blame them for the wrongs of English history.

      I don’t think we overspent on her security, she was over for 3 days, it being her first visit we pulled out all the stops, she loved it, and although we might not be seeing the immediate bump in numbers I honestly believe her visit has softened the anti British sentiment here making those provincial eejits I was talking about less common. In time we will see the benefits. Put the cost on its head, imagine if we skimped on the cost and she got hit with an egg, that would have been a diplomatic disaster

      Reply
    • mcbab 28/12/12 #

      Our President didn’t need to be protected from lunatics on his visits to UK. The Queen did need protection here from lunatics.

      Reply
    • Cal
      What a wonderfully silly comment. Your idea that the Government spent a large amount of money on securing the safety of Queen Elizabeth during her recent State visit was a waste because the expected increase in British tourists did not ensue and such an idea was always only ever spin!
      My dear Cal the principal reason for the exceptionally high levels of security had something to do with the risks emanating from those your proselytise for with nauseating frequency on these pages.
      The Tourist Bord were quite correct to predict an increase in visits to this country from British visitors and thus the Government saw the cost of the Royal visit together with that of the US President as a worthwhile investment.
      The number of tourists increased alright but not from the expected markets and you want to complain and whinge again and again at any positive things the government does.
      Any New Year resolutions……I could suggest a few.

      Reply
  • Rise in USA visitors is minuscule and has to be looked at compared to previous declines. Dublin is benefiting at the expense of rural Ireland where tourism is on its knees in some areas.

    Reply
  • check the land registry and see which barony your house is leased under apols it was 1900

    Reply
  • finbar m 28/12/12 #

    There all broke , the is on its knees nothing more nothing less

    Reply
  • But what about the €20 million on the Queens visit that was spent so that Kenny and Veradker et al could curtsy and tug their forelocks. Weren’t we told that there would be loads of Brits coming over.

    Reply
  • the queen came he re to renew the brits tenancy over the land that they own as did queen victoria one hundred years to the day 1912

    Reply

Add New Comment