Welcome to our Public Beta Site - What does this mean?
Dublin: 13 °C Thursday 24 May, 2012

‘Transition teams’ set up to manage public sector’s pension exodus

Image: Leon Farrell/Photocall Ireland

THE GOVERNMENT has set up a series of high-level ‘transition teams’ to manage the retirement of almost three per cent of the public workforce in the coming weeks.

Around 8,000 staff from the public sector are to leave their roles in the coming four weeks, taking advantage of an icentivised pensions scheme where workers will receive pensions based on their peak salaries and not their current ones.

The scheme, originally put in place by the previous government, has been criticised by some opposition parties who fear it will have a major impact in the delivery of public services.

Yesterday, however, Taoiseach Enda Kenny said a series of high-level units had been set up in various government departments to see how the public services could accommodate the retirements with the least disruption to public services.

The units would work with Departments, Ministers and local managers “to ensure that smooth transition” to the new staffing arrangements, he told RTÉ News.

The main units would operate in the health, education and justice sectors, which are most likely to be hit by reduced staffing: it is thought that around half of the staff stepping down at the end of the month come from the health services and schools, while Garda numbers will also be hit.

Asked why the ‘transition teams’ had not been appointed earlier, Kenny said the government wanted to examine precisely how many staff planned to retire before putting teams in place.

Joan Burton later said the Fine Gael-Labour coalition would “not necessarily” have designed the retirement scheme the way it now existed, saying some of its inherent difficulties were inherited from the Fianna Fáil-Green Party government.

The presence of the Croke Park deal had “kept an enhanced form of social partnership discussion” without disruptions through strikes or other industrial action, she told The Week in Politics programme.

In response, Sinn Féin’s social protection spokesman said the new government had had nearly a year to amend the retirement scheme, and had not taken that opportunity.

McCarthy bemoans Government’s “ham-fisted” public retirement scheme

Taoiseach: public sector retirements will not affect frontline services

Read Next:

Comments (24 Comments)

  • Peter Carroll 06/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    So how does a loss of 8000 from a workforce of 300,000 create so many problems?

    Reply
    • Jay funk 06/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      Because its Ireland

    • Michael Cuthbert 06/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      If it was even across departments there’d be zero effect, Peter. But when 47 out of 200 midwives go from one unit, it’s probably a problem?

    • Aaron McKenna 06/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      8,000 people with long service – The wedge gets thinner as you go up, so for example I know a hospital losing some of its top lab people, who will not be passing on their expertise to those below them on the ladder (aside from creating capacity issues.)

      It’s crazy to lose people indiscriminately. No business could survive while doing it. Why does government act so differently to the real world?

    • HELLO SPRUIKER 06/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      ‘Transition teams’ set up to manage public sector’s pension exodus??

      This is a National Emergency.

      We are under attack from the Troica!!!

      Get the Sleveens in to the lifeboats (with plenty of supplies) immediately!!

      And while you are at it throw the children and the elderly overboard to reduce the weight.

      How brave and noble.

    • michael cuthbert 06/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      It’s ok Mr Spruiker. These are ‘high level’ transition teams. No need to implement contingency exodus strategic evacuation drills just yet. Enda’s got it covered…

    • Michael Cuthbert 06/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      It is also most reassuring to know that Enda has specialist advisers who brief him on an hourly basis about the substantive issues that concern the voters going forward. A true leader of men (and women who like blonds)…

    • Paul Mallon 06/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      @ Aaron, don’t worry about it dude, Ends has it under control – they’ll just get your grand kids and great grand kids to pay for this current round of fuck ups. sorted!

  • Sean O'Keeffe 06/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    Barn door, horse bolted!

    Reply
  • Tom Mc Carthy 06/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    lets transition them all out of office.

    Reply
    • Neil Kettles 06/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      Another day, another load of bollix from Enda. Isn’t there something in the constitution about having to be reasonably intelligent before you can be in Government?

  • Dominic Achom 06/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    Transitional team…….. cant believe what am hearing. Is this Bettie Ahern speaking.

    Reply
  • john g mcgrath 06/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    I can just see it now the A team making a return.
    This resembles an episode of The Office only problem is people will be hurt in this farce.
    Another quango or quangos to be set up.Does this man not realise that there are ordinary people in this country with basic common cop on to know that these guys are stumbling around a dark room looking for a light switch only problem is they are in the room where switch is outside

    Reply
  • Eileen Gabbett 06/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    Hilarious ! Enda you should really Really , start listening to people .
    Having an education is always admirable but so is having experience.
    They go hand in hand and you have totally ignored experience. It
    always counts over learned facts, initially anyway .
    What are the purpose of these ”transition teams” ? I am continually
    amazed at the stupidity of this government .Ms. Joan Burton said they
    would not have done it this way…..It hardly came as a surprise ,they had
    a year to examine and change what was necessary . Get a grip you all
    do not know what you are doing . Knee jerk reactions all the time.
    Enough is enough !

    Reply
  • Michael Cuthbert 06/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    These high level transition teams will burrow deep into the tough issues we face to reduce the level of staff producing as much work as heretofor…

    Reply
  • Joe Sixtwo 06/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    “Transition teams” = Highly paid jobs for the boys that will come to the conclusion that the present system of management is not sustainable and is due an overhaul. This in turn will lead to a massive PR campaign of how this is not their fault and they will quickly list their imaginary achievements.

    Reply
  • Dearbhla Carmody 06/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    and how many jobs have been created in these ‘transition’ teams, what cost, and how many politicians wives / girlfriends / daughters / next door neighbours got jobs in the transition teams

    Reply
  • Sherbet Bell 06/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    once again jobs for the boys…………there will no creation of jobs just more quangoes to fill this role, use civil servent in other areas and then find jobs again for the after………………….. and the good civil servent sgo unappreciated

    Reply
    • Michael Cuthbert 06/02/12 #
      Report this comment

      Fear not Sherbet. Enda hasn’t published the Pathways to Work strategy yet. No new jobs can be created until publication takes place. The ‘high level transition teams’ will be made up of high level civil servants, political advisers and ministers. They will sit around tables and discuss the implementation of the message to ensure transparency in government remains a goal towards progress…

  • Terry Turner 06/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    It gets sillier every week. If the managers had any competence worthy of their jobs, change management teams should have been in existence for the part 4 years. Managers seems to be willingly or unwillingly constrained by the politicians. What are the so called advisers advising about – probably just how to mislead the citizens.

    Reply
  • Dave Harris 06/02/12 #
    Report this comment

    Its like something from Yes Minister, or father ted.
    It’s a freaking comedy anyway.
    But we’re not laughing

    Reply

Add New Comment