TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

WIT president increased office spending 20-fold in eight years, TDs are told

TDs are told how Prof Kieran Byrne increased non-pay spending in his office from about €30,000 to €634,000 in eight years.

Waterford IT president Dr Ruaidhrí Neavyn said concerns had been raised over spending by his predecessor, Prof Kieran Byrne, shortly after his appointment in 2001.
Waterford IT president Dr Ruaidhrí Neavyn said concerns had been raised over spending by his predecessor, Prof Kieran Byrne, shortly after his appointment in 2001.
Image: Dr Ruaidhrí Neavyn

THE FORMER PRESIDENT of Waterford Institute of Technology oversaw a major surge in non-pay expenditure in his office – with spending increasing twenty-fold in just eight years, TDs have been told.

The Dáil’s Public Accounts Committee yesterday heard how non-pay spending at the office of the president had stood at about €30,000 in the year 2000 – but increase significantly shortly after Professor Kieran Byrne took the helm in 2001.

Eight years later, non-pay spending had reached a peak of €634,308, with major spending on taxi firms, PR companies and flowers – leading the committee’s vice-chairman, Kieran O’Donnell, to describe his non-pay spending as “a personal slush fund”.

WIT chief financial officer Tony McFeely told members that he had approached Byrne early into his tenure, saying he was “uncomfortable” offering pre-approval for his travel expenses as they were not in line with the college’s travel and subsistence guidelines.

“His position was that in his previous job… he was making similar submissions and that wasn’t an issue,” McFeely said, adding that he had raised concerns with individual members of the college board on a confidential basis.

Changed authority

Byrne subsequently changed the mechanism for approving his travel spending, giving responsibility to another senior executive at the college. That person retired in 2008, after which responsibility fell back to McFeely.

A briefing note prepared by the college showed that non-pay expenditure between 2006 and 2010, the last five full calendar years of Byrne’s tenure, totalled €2.66 million.

Waterford IT’s current president Dr Ruaidhrí Neavyn conceded that it “would be hard for me to put forward a justification” for the spending incurred under his predecessor’s watch – but said a further breakdown of spending, outlined in a second external report, could not be published.

“We’ve been advised not to make any comment on the content of the report,” he said, saying that report could be the subject of legal proceedings in the future.

Neavyn asserted, however, that there was no evidence that spending in the office had gone “to the direct benefit” of his predecessor.

Byrne left Waterford IT last year at the end of his ten-year term as president – despite a recommendation from the institute’s governing body that he be reappointed – as reports of his office spending first emerged.

Read: Waterford IT chartered €4,200 flight for one person

Read next:

Comments (23 Comments)

  • Not surprised at these figures…these guys were spending it like the Medici’s from Renaissance Italy…and when my mate was in college in WIT there was never enough basic lab equipment in the Science dept…an absolute disgrace!!!!!

    Reply
    • My third year there, still the same, maybe worse.
      The new Engineering building was cancelled last year, that’s the derelict site by the rear car park if anyone’s wondering.
      I won’t mention the 3rd yr projects becuase I’m embarrased.

      Reply
    • aaahh David
      dont ya know that the flowers in his orifice ooops office are more important than students education because if you/I or anyone else becomes to well educated they will start seeing just how the system works and cramp their overly well funded (at our expense) lives and want the same

      Reply
  • He left unscathed after 10 years of this…another fine job lads, I love paying my taxes to keep this system of thieving bastards going.

    Reply
  • Reading what this guy got up to would make your stomach turn. WIT charge €10 if you need a letter from the secretary……just satin

    Reply
  • I’m a current student in WIT and the facilities (or lack thereof) are disgraceful. To think Byrne spent ?100,000 on his office furniture while staff and students have to fight for basic amenities like computer access and printers shows how little regard there is for the primary role of the institute, not its position as a cushy number for civil servants. These public institutions need to get their priorities straight and stop allowing themselves to be a pre-retirement holiday camps.

    Reply
  • Can’t comment due to possible legal action in the future,,, Yeah right!! This is fast becoming the new catch phrase from the ruling class. Translation We just want it to fall out of the public mind, if we don’t comment the story has no legs, now feck off and were are my pension forms!!

    Reply
  • To be honest this sums up the problems in Ireland in a nutshell.

    Too many cosy cartels of the back-scratching kind. Weak oversight on our spending and a reluctance of behalf of those who should speak out to actually do so because our laws don’t support whistleblowers when they do speak up.

    As somebody who is a graduate of WIT (many many years ago when it was still WRTC) I am disappointed that such activities have happened there. The college deserves better.

    Reply
  • Fire him with no pension… to waste that much of the taxpayers money is criminal

    Reply
  • Reg 28/09/12 #

    He must be related to Bertie! But it took Bertie ten years to double spending!

    Reply
  • There should be a criminal charge of reckless use of public funds. Threat of jail would make people more careful. And while I’m at it, running a bank (or any other business) recklessly should also be a criminal offence. That’s how Swedish bankers ended up in jail after their banking collapse in the early 90′s

    Reply
  • What a joke!!There has to be accountability for this kind of carry on but you can bet anything there won’t.Disgraceful!!

    Reply
  • This should kill off any talk about a University of the South East,
    and let us have the names of WIT’s council made public so that the public can express their opinions face-to-face.

    Reply
    • Why should this kill of any possibility of a university in the South-East? Because of one mans greed? A University in Waterford is in the national interest. Dozens of reports have indicated that. The only thing stopping it is vested interested in their ivory towers in TCD/UCD & UCC who don’t want to share the pie. Are the people of the South-East second rate citizens who don’t deserve equal opportunity to 3rd level education????

      Reply
    • It is not just one man’s autocracy but the idleness, incompetence and indifference of WIT’s governing body who not only allowed him to run amok but actually wanted him re-appointed!

      “Are the people of the South-East second rate citizens?” you ask. Well, their representatives certainly are and why should the rest of us put money in the hands of these scoundrels so that they can waste it again. When/if you people punish them I might reconsider my view but, until then, not one cent to Waterford.

      Reply
    • Constructing a building and calling it a University does not actually make it one. It’s precisely because the people of the South-East deserve equal opportunity that the “University” in Waterford project should not proceed. How many World Class Universities do you think we can create on this small Island? TCD/UCD/UCC/UL/DCU already facing challenges.

      Reply
  • Fire him! Simple as that.

    Reply
    • Reg 28/09/12 #

      He’s gone, go after his pension. Tony McFeely needs to be fired as he was the financial controller and did nothing. As per usual these people will sail of into the sunset with their gold plated pensions. Banana republic doesn’t begin to describe this.

      Reply
  • I’m sad to see this rubbish is still going on, I’m not surprised. When I was studying at an IT early-mid 90s, there was a sneaky scheme to divert as much of the ESF student grant money into the pockets of a small cadre of college staff, by marking students absent even when they were in class but late. Hard for students union to complain, young easily intimidated students (18-21 yrs) screamed at and had ashtrays thrown at them at meetings. They were eventually found out, some staff lost their Golf Club fees etc.

    Reply
  • Depressing !

    Reply
  • Witless !

    Reply
  • To think people voted yes to this on May 31st.

    Reply

Add New Comment