Readers like you keep news free for everyone.
More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.
For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.
Readers like you keep news free for everyone.
More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.
For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.
JUSTICE MINISTER ALAN Shatter has ruled out any possibility that new legislation allowing for parliamentary inquiries will lead to a fresh examination of the circumstances surrounding the Stardust nightclub fire 32 years ago.
Shatter said that given there isn’t “any identified [new] evidence” it “would not be in the public interest” to establish an inquiry into the fire which killed 48 people and injured 214 on Valentine’s Night, 1981.
“No new information has been put forward which would warrant a departure from this conclusion,” Shatter said in a written answer last month.
Families have campaigned for decades for a fresh inquiry into the fire as they did not accept the original inquiry finding that the blaze in the north Dublin venue was probably started deliberately.
Labour TD Tommy Broughan had asked Shatter if in light of the recently-passed Houses of the Oireachtas Inquiries, Privileges and Procedures Act would he consider a parliamentary inquiry into the disaster.
Broughan cited the “the continued dissatisfaction of the families that the matter has not been fully investigated heretofore in view of new information that has come to their attention in the recent past”.
Shatter said that an independent examination of evidence presented by the Stardust Victims Committee in 2009 had found that there was no “new or other evidence capable of establishing the cause of the fire”.
“To establish a new inquiry for that purpose, in the absence of any identified evidence, would not be in the public interest. No new information has been put forward which would warrant a departure from this conclusion,” Shatter said.
The examination of evidence by barrister Paul Coffey four years ago found that due to the passage of time and lack of any physical evidence it would not be in the public interest for a new inquiry to be established.
Broughan also asked Shatter if he thought that all the recommendations contained in the Coffey report had been fulfilled particularly with regard to the “counselling and medical needs” of victims’ families.
Shatter said that arrangements to provide services to families have been in place since February 2010 and “this facility remains in place for those who wish to avail of it”.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site