We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Ian Hinton, right, watches his partner Chris Teoh sign their wedding register in Canberra on 7 December 2013. The High Court overruled the state's law a few days later. Rob Griffith AP/Press Association Images
Not happening

Australian opposition blocks marriage equality vote due to divisive debate it would cause

The Labor Party says the debate surrounding a referendum could be harmful to those in same-sex relationships and their families.

AUSTRALIA’S PLAN TO hold a national vote on same-sex marriage seems doomed today after the opposition Labor Party vowed to block the poll it said would spark divisive debate.

Debate on gay marriage in Australia has gone on for more than a decade and conservative Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull planned to resolve the issue via a referendum on 11 February.

However, Labor leader Bill Shorten said not only was the proposed plebiscite of 15 million voters expensive and divisive, but could be harmful to those in same-sex relationships and their families by exposing them to questions over the “integrity” of their unions.

“This country does not have the right in a plebiscite to pass judgement on the marriages and relationships of some of our fellow Australians,” Shorten told a news conference in Canberra.

It is not what Australia is about. We could make marriage equality a reality today by having a free vote in the parliament and that is what should be done.

Despite strong popular support for marriage equality, Australia is seen as lagging behind other nations which allow same-sex couples the right to wed.

Same-sex couples can have civil unions or register their relationships in most states across Australia, but the government does not consider them married under national law.

A same-sex marriage referendum passed in Ireland in May 2015.

Law-making process 

Shorten said gay Australians should not be subjected to a different law-making process than other Australians.

“Why should a couple in a committed relationship have to metaphorically knock on the doors of 15 million of their fellow Australians and see if they agree with it?,” he asked.

Turnbull, a long-time supporter of gay marriage, had argued that a plebiscite, costing some Aus$170 million (about €115 million), would allow all Australians to express their view.

He has insisted that if the vote was carried parliament would ensure that gay marriage was legislated even though the plebiscite would not be binding on parliament.

But in announcing the proposed date last month, he admitted the vote could be blocked by opponents in the Senate, where the government does not hold an outright majority.

Australian Marriage Equality’s Alex Greenwich said in a Facebook message that his organisation would be urging the Senate to deny the plebiscite and work towards changing the law via a parliamentary vote.

© AFP 2016

Poll: Should Donald Trump withdraw from the US Presidential race?

Read: Own a Samsung Galaxy Note 7? Turn it off

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.