Advertisement

Readers like you keep news free for everyone.

More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.

For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.

Support us today
Not now
Monday 4 December 2023 Dublin: 3°C
Jonathan Brady via PA Images The Burberry shop in New Bond Street, London
Destroyed

Burberry burns €32 million worth of unsold products to protect its brand

News of Burberry’s destruction policy has drawn flak in Britain.

LUXURY BRITISH FASHION house Burberry has destroyed tens of millions of euro worth of its fashion and cosmetic products over the past year to protect its brand.

The company burned unsold clothes, accessories and perfume worth €32 million, according to its annual report, in a practice now common across the industry to guard against counterfeiting.

Retailers describe it as a measure to protect intellectual property and prevent products from being stolen or sold at discounted prices.

“Burberry has careful processes in place to minimise the amount of excess stock we produce,” the company said in a statement.

“On the occasions when disposal of products is necessary, we do so in a responsible manner and we continue to seek ways to reduce and revalue our waste.”

Among the products destroyed were £10.4 million (€11.6 million) worth of beauty items, which Burberry said was a one-off related to a licence it agreed with beauty company Coty last year.

The firm – which announced a slight rise in annual profits in May to £294 million (€328 million) – has said it takes its environmental obligations seriously and harnesses the energy from burning the items.

It also pointed to partnerships with organisations such as the Ellen MacArthur Foundation that work to reduce waste in the industry.

But news of its destruction policy drew flak in Britain.

Lawmaker Tim Farron, environment spokesman for the opposition Liberal Democrat party, said: “It is outrageous that Burberry thinks setting fire to their unsold stock is an acceptable solution.”

Noting recycling was “far better for the environment”, he added: “As a leading British fashion brand they should be leading the way in sustainable fashion.”

© – AFP 2018

Your Voice
Readers Comments
44
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel