This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy. You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site. To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
OK
Dublin: 8 °C Thursday 25 April, 2019
Advertisement

Press watchdog rejects complaint over ad for 'overstuffed' Subway sandwich

Viewer Peter Thomas submitted a complaint to the BAI over an ad showing a sandwich filled with what he felt was a misleading number of chicken breast slices.

Image: Steve Parsons/PA Archive/PA Images

A COMPLAINT OVER a TV ad for an “overstuffed” Subway sandwich has been rejected by the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland (BAI).

Viewer Peter Thomas complained to the press watchdog that the ad – which ran on TV3 and 3e through March 2015 – showed a six-inch chicken chipotle sandwich filled with what he felt was a misleading number of chicken breast slices.

The complainant alleged that he had verified in “a number of outlets” that the sandwich in question is served with only “two tablespoonfuls of tiny chicken pieces”.

For this reason, he stated, the broadcast images were “doubly false” with regard to both “the nature and amount of what [is] actually served” in outlets.

The complainant said that any claim that the chicken was shown prior to cooked preparation would not hold as:

  • the chunks of chicken shown in the ad were already cooked,
  • uncooked chicken would never be included in sandwiches served to customers.

Subjective experience

In response, TV3 stated that it ensures all ads aired on the channel abide by the BAI’s guidelines for commercial communication.

The broadcaster noted that it could not “reasonably be expected to conduct a survey of Subway outlets to compare the sold products with the images included in the actual advertisement”.

The BAI unanimously rejected the complaint, saying it found no evidence in the complainant’s submission that the sandwich did not contain the set of ingredients shown in the ad.

The watchdog determined that the ad was not false or misleading, and that the complaint against it was based on the subjective experience of only one customer.

Read: TV and radio watchdog rejects complaints that Chris Donoghue was ‘rude and hostile’

Read: Complaint that Ireland AM showed condom being put onto model of erect penis

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

About the author:

Catherine Healy

Read next:

COMMENTS (27)