Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Colm Keaveney (File photo) Leon Farrell/Photocall Ireland
Labour

Labour chairman Colm Keaveney wants party conference held in April

Keaveney, who voted against the Budget, wants the issue of his chairmanship sorted as soon as possible amid rumblings that Labour wants to oust him but an April conference is unlikely.

LABOUR CHAIRMAN COLM Keaveney will write to Tánaiste and party leader Eamon Gilmore later this week requesting that the party’s conference be held in April in light of questions surrounding his chairmanship.

Having lost the party whip following his vote against the Budget in December pressure has been mounting on Keaveney to relinquish his role as Labour chairman, a role he was elected to by party members at its conference in Galway last year.

Labour’s conference is due to be held in the autumn because of the EU presidency dominating the first six months of this year and it’s understood the party currently has no intention of bringing it forward despite the issue surrounding Keaveney.

But in a statement Keaveney has said that in light of the “continuing issue being made of my carrying out of my democratic mandate as Chairperson of the Labour Party” the conference should be held in April.

The Galway East TD said: “At this Conference I will place myself for re-election before the membership and they will have the opportunity through the internal democratic mechanisms of the party to either remove me or to retain me in the position of Chair.

“Any other method of the removal of the Party Chair, through legal means or through a questionable internal process will lack the stamp of democratic fairness and respect for members.”

Labour acknowledges that the only way by which Keaveney can be removed from the chair is by a vote at party conference. Were he to be removed by any other means, it would likely be met with a legal challenge by Keaveney.

‘Current direction’

The Labour chair, who has been gathering over 1,400 submissions from grassroots members of the party in recent weeks, also wants to hold the conference earlier to “reflect on our current direction in government and on our future ambitions”.

He continued: “I have heard many Labour member voices, including some from within the Parliamentary Labour Party, express satisfaction with our current polling numbers of around 13 per cent , stating that these are the levels achieved in the last local elections.

“This attitude smacks to me of lacking in ambition for our party and more importantly for the implementation of the measures needed to fulfil our social democratic vision for our society and republic.”

In an apparent rebuke of Communications Minister Pat Rabbitte’s recent criticism of the media’s coverage of politics, Keaveney said that there was little point to this given Labour’s promise to protect child benefit, a promise it broke in the Budget.

He added: “There is little in point in politicians complaining our the media being overly cynical towards politics and politicians when we give people due cause to feel feel such cynicism towards parties that freely break promises on the basis of saying what it takes to get elected being a justification for such a breach of trust.”

Responding to queries about the possibility of an earlier party conference, a Labour Party spokesperson said: “The decision as to when the Party Conference takes place is a matter solely for the  Labour Party Executive Board.”

Read: Keaveney criticises ‘cynicism’ of ministers over his voting against government

Read: Keaveney “determined” to remain Labour party chairman

Your Voice
Readers Comments
47
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.