This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy. You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site. To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
OK
#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Dublin: 13 °C Monday 10 August, 2020
Advertisement

Dublin man has conviction for taking part in gang rape quashed over undisclosed evidence

The Court of Appeal heard the case today and quashed the man’s conviction.

Image: PA Images

THE COURT OF Appeal has quashed the conviction of a Dublin man for taking part in a gang rape, after the defence received previously undisclosed information that the complainant had made other sexual allegations in the past.

The Director of Public Prosecutions did not oppose the man’s application to have his conviction overturned.

The now 25-year-old, who was jailed for four years in June 2017, is reserving his position in relation to compensation for a miscarriage of justice.

He had pleaded not guilty to raping the woman with two other men at a house in Dublin on a date in May, 2014. She had gone there with them, after meeting them in a nightclub. It was alleged that when she asked them to stop the rape, she was told: “It’s your birthday surprise”.

A jury found him guilty, following a four-day trial at the Central Criminal Court. A sentence of six years’ imprisonment was imposed. The final two years were suspended.

His barrister, Caroline Biggs SC, today applied to the Court of Appeal to quash the conviction. She had first applied to the court in January to adduce fresh evidence, and her client was granted bail at that point, with the consent of the State.

Biggs said that documentation had been received, which showed that the complainant had made allegations of a sexual nature previous to this case. This material had not been disclosed to the defence and could have had a material impact on the outcome, she said.

The Director of Public Prosecutions, represented in court by Paul Green SC, acceded to the application and conceded that no retrial should be ordered.

Mr Justice Edwards, presiding with Justice Patrick McCarthy and Justice Úna Ní Raifeartaigh, quashed the conviction and made no further order.

Biggs said that she was reserving her position in relation to Section 9 of the 1993 Criminal Procedure Act. This relates to compensation for a miscarriage of justice.

The trial had heard that the woman, who was in her 20s, was celebrating her birthday in a nightclub with friends. She had taken cocaine, alcohol and Ecstasy in the club when she met a man there.

They kissed and she agreed to go to a house with him. She got a taxi to the house with him and two other men, including the man in this case.

She had consensual sex with the first man in a bedroom, before two other men entered and began trying to have sex with her.

The man in this case admitted having sex with her.

#Open journalism No news is bad news Support The Journal

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support us now

He told gardaí that when the woman came back to the house there was a conversation about a “threesome”. He said she told him it was OK for him to “join in”.

However, she said that it was not consensual.

Justice Isobel Kennedy said that the man, who had no previous convictions, acted out of character on the night.

She had noted the defence submissions that he was previously a “peaceful, law-abiding, diligent young man” who came from a decent, hard-working family.

The court heard that his family and current girlfriend had remained supportive. He had acted in loco parentis for his partner’s children. He had an impressive work history and was not someone who abused alcohol, drugs or people.

Justice Kennedy had suspended the last two years of his sentence to allow for the “very realistic prospect” of rehabilitation.

Comments are closed for legal reasons

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

About the author:

Natasha Reid

Read next:

COMMENTS