Readers like you keep news free for everyone.

More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.

For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.

Support us today
Not now
Sunday 3 December 2023 Dublin: 0°C

DPP to argue sentence in teleporter manslaughter case was too lenient

The Director of Public Prosecutions is seeking a review of the sentence on grounds that it was “unduly lenient”.

PROSECUTORS HAVE BEEN given a date in December to argue that the five-year jail term given to Kerry farmer Michael Ferris for killing his neighbour after a decades-long row about a noisy bird-scarer, was “unduly lenient”.

Dairy farmer Ferris (64) of Rattoo, Ballyduff, Co Kerry, had denied murdering his neighbour Anthony O’Mahony (73) over the use of a crow-banger – used for scaring birds – at Rattoo, on the morning of 4 April 2017.

The Central Criminal Court heard evidence that tillage farmer O’ Mahony suffered “catastrophic injuries” after he was repeatedly stabbed with the prongs of the teleporter while he sat in his car.

A two-week trial was told that the noise from the crow-banger “would wake the dead”.

A jury sitting in Tralee found Ferris not guilty of murder but guilty of Mr O’Mahony’s manslaughter by a majority verdict of 10 to two.

Sentencing Ferris to six years imprisonment with the final year suspended, Ms Justice Carmel Stewart said Ferris had inflicted “horrific and horrendous” injuries on the deceased which defied belief and imagination.

The only consolation for the O’Mahony family was that his death would have been instantaneous in what was a “truly gruesome and horrific” attack, she said. 

She backdated Ferris’ sentence to 4 April 2017 when he first went into custody.

The Director of Public Prosecutions is seeking a review of Ferris’ sentence on grounds it was “unduly lenient”.

President of the Court of Appeal Mr Justice George Birmingham fixed 2 December next as the date for the hearing. He also listed the DPP’s appeal for hearing in Cork.

Brendan Grehan SC, defending bachelor farmer Ferris, told the Central Criminal Court that his client wished to express remorse and sorrow for his actions that day as well as for the death of Mr O’Mahony.

The defence had argued that there had been cumulative provocation because of the behaviour of the deceased.

In his closing speech to the jury of seven men and five women, Mr Grehan said he made no apology for speaking ill of the dead, which was not a normal thing to do but the community in Rattoo was being “oppressed” by Mr O’Mahony and living in fear of a “totally unreasonable person”.

 After the sentence hearing, Mr O’Mahony’s niece, Ann O’Carroll, spoke outside court.

“Our family strongly believe that justice was not served in this case. The just outcome would have been a conviction for murder given that the crime was clearly deliberate and premeditated as outlined during the trial,” she said.

“The trial was a deeply distressing and painful ordeal for our family. Our brother, uncle and friend was taken from us in the most brutal and violent way possible.

“This pain was made worse by the blackening of Anthony’s good name and character during the trial when he was not there to defend himself. And now our pain has been exacerbated by the lenient sentence imposed today,” Ms O’Carroll said.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel