We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.


Thursday: Dunnes Stores strike... Friday: Dunnes Stores dismissals

The retailer has escalated the hardline nature of its employee relations by apparently letting some striking staff go in the wake of the workers’ action on 2 April.

DUNNES STORES ARE reported to have let some employees go, among other actions, in the wake of last Thursday’s long-anticipated countrywide industrial action.

The workers’ trade union, Mandate, has received reports that some of its members who took part on the picket on 2 April  have been summarily dismissed.

Others have had their hours cut, their roles changed (in some cases after more than 20 years in the same back office role), and their shift patterns altered, all in the six days since the industrial action.

One of the reported dismissals took place less than 24 hours after the worker in question participated on the strike.

It seems the employee in question was made permanent some weeks ago but then let go last Friday, the day after the strike, and told there ‘simply wasn’t the business’ to warrant his continued employment.

Since that time the worker’s role has been made available to other employees who didn’t take part in the strike action.

Speaking to, Mandate’s Assistant General Secretary Gerry Light described Dunnes’ behaviour as ‘deplorable’ and something that should be ‘condemned by everybody’.

“For the life of me I can’t understand what they think they’re doing.  All that can come of this is a hardening of both sides’ positions,” he said.

You’re talking about a strike that clearly had the support across a huge number of bodies in Irish society.
Logic would tell you to move towards a resolution, not engage in more provocative behaviour.
The only thing that will be damaged by behaviour like this is their own (Dunnes’) business.
Because this is an unprecedented situation and unprecedented behaviour on any employer’s behalf, certainly in my experience.

mandate light Mandate's Gerry Light Photocall Photocall

Light is of the opinion that Dunnes’ actions are entirely premeditated, and indeed had been planned for some time prior to the strike.

“The only resolution I can see to this, other than further escalation of our industrial action, is when the government’s collective bargaining legislation goes live in July,” he said.

That will give the workers more teeth and may make Dunnes sit up and take notice. requested comment from Dunnes Stores but has received no response.

Last week’s strike came after many months of workers’ unrest.  With at least three quarters of Dunnes’ staff on flexible short-term contracts, its workers were campaigning on a number of fronts:

  • A demand for the implementation of banded-hour contracts
  • Fair pay for workers
  • A review of the use of temporary contracts of employment
  • The right to union representation for Dunnes’ workers

The company’s approach throughout the saga has been consistently uncompromising.

In October last year Dunnes failed to show up for a Labour Court hearing with Mandate, while the company offered a 20% discount on all online purchases on the day of last week’s strike, a move that was almost universally condemned.

Read: Staff at Dunnes Stores set to strike over work and pay conditions

Read: Dunnes Stores staff to strike on Holy Thursday

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.