Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland
Central Criminal Court

Food delivery cyclist denies not wanting to involve gardaí in murder trial cross-examination

George Gonzaga Bento, accused of the murder of 16-year-old Josh Dunne, was cross-examined today.

A FOOD DELIVERY cyclist accused of murdering schoolboy Josh Dunne has denied that he acted the “hard-man” on the night and wanted to deal with the situation himself while armed with a knife, rather than involve gardaí.

George Gonzaga Bento was being cross-examined today by the State in his murder trial at the Central Criminal Court.

The father-of-two disagreed that whilst the attack on him and his fellow delivery cyclist by a man on a moped and a group of youths was “ugly, violent and unlawful” there was no real attack on his life that night.

Bento (36), a Brazilian national with an address in East Wall in Dublin 3, is charged with murdering 16-year-old Josh Dunne at East Wall Road, East Wall on 26 January 2021.

Bento is also accused of producing a utility knife in a manner likely to intimidate another in the course of a dispute or fight. He is further accused of assault causing harm to two other young men on the same occasion.

The delivery cyclist has pleaded not guilty to each of the four counts.

The prosecution alleges that Bento produced a knife during a “stand-off or confrontation” with a man on a moped who had stolen another delivery cyclist’s bike. Josh Dunne and other youths arrived at the scene and got involved in the confrontation.

Bento told gardaí in his interviews that he had used a knife to defend himself from the man on the moped and the gang of youths. He said it was only his intention to intimidate them when he took out the knife and make them go away.

He said he stabbed the first and second males who punched and attacked him as he was scared and wanted to protect himself.

The accused broke down yesterday as he told his barrister Padraig Dwyer SC that he considers himself a good person and that his intention was never to hurt anyone.

Telling the jury yesterday that Josh and another youth had “come for” and attacked him, Bento said: “Both of them attack me and I react to that attack. I just try to keep me safe and defend myself [sic]“.

At the outset of his cross-examination today, Bento agreed with Sean Guerin SC, prosecuting, that he didn’t dispute that he caused injuries which led to the death of Josh Dunne, three stab injuries to another young male and a stab injury to a third male.

Guerin put it to the accused that the prosecution accepted that he was lawfully entitled to recover the stolen bike that night.

However, counsel put it to Bento that he should not have taken a knife out in confrontation with the man on the moped and in the fight with the teenagers and then repeatedly stab three males with it.

“My life was at risk and I did that to preserve my life and my friend’s life,” he replied.

Counsel also put it to the accused that it was the State’s case that he had used unreasonable force on the night. The accused said he disagreed with this proposition.

Counsel further put it to the defendant that he went after the man on the moped not just to help but to give him [the man on the moped] a fright. “I don’t believe if I ask the thief to give the bike back that it’s enough,” he said.

Guerin asked the accused if it was not necessary to call gardai on the night then why was it necessary to “pull a knife”. “Cause he[man on moped] don’t go away,” he said.

Counsel put it to Bento that he couldn’t have tried very hard to call gardaí as he had plenty of time to do it. “We believed just conversation was enough,” he said.

The accused disagreed that he wanted to deal with the situation himself that night armed with a knife instead of involving gardai. “Completely not,” he added.

Bento went on to agree that he had “pulled the knife” on the man on the moped when he was under no immediate threat but disagreed that he had acted “the hard man” on the night.

“You acted like a man who had come ready to fight with the knife?” asked Guerin.

“I was working, I was doing my job and I tried to avoid the crime,” he said.

Guerin put it to Bento that when the man on the moped said “who is the hard man now”, he was talking about the accused.

“I’ve no idea,” he said.

The lawyer suggested to the accused that it was untrue when he told the jury that he only remembered stabbing two people and that he had a clear recollection of stabbing the third male when he was interviewed by gardai. The accused disagreed with this.

He later told Guerin that he couldn’t properly remember the amount of times he “hit with the knife” because there were many things going on at the time.

Guerin put it to the defendant that the account he gave gardaí as to how he took the knife and went to stab someone was much more favourable to him. “I just say what I remember at that point,” he replied.

He said he did not know whether gardaí had CCTV footage of the incident when he gave his account to gardaí.

“I suggest you were willing to take the chance and willing to give an account of self-defence even though you know it was not the truth,” said Guerin. The accused disagreed.

Asked if he had shown the knife to the teenagers on the night to get them to stop, the accused said he did not remember if he had time to show it or not as everything had happened very fast.

He accepted that if he had shown the knife to the teenagers it could have brought the incident to an end.

Guerin put it to the accused that the second male was not hitting his fellow delivery cyclist at the time he stabbed him. “It’s hard to say, they surrounded and threatened us, how can I say?” he replied.

When asked what it felt like to hold the knife in his hand, Bento said that when a person realises that their life is in danger then they fight for it.

“I just fight for my life, I’m afraid for my friend and I act to protect. The knife was one way I tried to evacuate the place,” he added.

“Were you conscious how dangerous that knife was?” asked Guerin.

“My life was in danger and if my life was in danger I could use something to protect myself,” he said.

He said the knife was used to cut fruit and not to fight.

“This knife saved my friend’s life, I used it to protect myself,” he continued.

“Do you agree or not that the knife was extremely dangerous in the circumstances in which you took it out?” asked Guerin.

“This knife was the way I showed him [man on moped] I don’t want conflict, I just want to leave that place,” Bento said.

Bento said the situation had forced him to use the knife and it was “not like I used a knife all the time”.

The accused was asked if he accepted that he had significantly escalated the situation when he stabbed one of the youths.

“I don’t know if I didn’t use a knife at that point, they could have come together at us and attacked us. I used the knife to preserve my life and my friend’s life. I don’t use knife to try and hurt somebody,” he said.

“Did you believe your life was in danger when Josh Dunne punched you?” asked Guerin.

The accused replied: “It’s like you take one piece for all things, it’s not only one against me, it’s a lot of pieces together”.

“Is it that you didn’t think Josh Dunne threatened your life but the whole situation?” asked counsel. The accused said it was the “whole situation”.

The accused disagreed that whilst the attack on him and his fellow delivery cyclist by the man on the moped and the teenagers was “ugly, violent and unlawful”, there was no real attack on his life.

He disagreed that he knew he used more force on the night than deemed necessary.

“You have known that Josh Dunne’s punches on you were done to defend his friends from your unjustified use of the knife,” asked Guerin.

“I don’t know why he attacked me, I just pushed him away,” he replied.

He also denied that his only concern was for himself when he learnt that someone had died on the night of 26 January.

The trial continues tomorrow before Justice Paul Burns and the 12 jurors.