We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Suspended teacher Enoch Burke. (File) Enoch Burke

Teacher Enoch Burke to remain in prison after refusing to purge contempt of court

The suspended teacher appeared before court again this morning.

LAST UPDATE | 7 Sep 2022

SUSPENDED TEACHER ENOCH Burke is to return to prison after refusing to purge his contempt of court and comply with a temporary injunction preventing him from attending or teaching at the secondary school where he is employed.

Appearing before court this morning, Burke said he would love to obey the court but that he cannot. 

Burke told the court that it could deprive him of his liberty and his dignity, but it could not deprive him of his integrity and his faith in god. 

Burke was committed to prison earlier this week until he agrees to obey a court order not to attend at or attempt to teach any classes at Wilson’s Hospital School in Co Westmeath, which suspended him from his position as a teacher of History and German.

He told the court that even if he had to remain in prison for “every hour of every day for the next 100 years” he would not compromise his beliefs nor agree to comply with the terms of the court order.

The order was granted after the school’s lawyers claimed that Burke was not complying with either the terms of his paid suspension, as well as the injunction requiring him to stay away from the school.

When the matter returned before the High Court today, Mr Justice Max Barrett, after considering submissions from Burke and Rosemary Mallon Bl for the school, ruled that the injunction should remain in place until the action has been fully determined by the High Court.

In his ruling the judge accepted the school’s board of management argument that the application before the court today was not about Burke’s opposition to transgenderism nor his religious beliefs.

It was as the school submitted, about Burke’s refusal to comply with the terms of his paid suspension and the terms of the injunction obtained by the school.

Issues raised by Burke, the judge added, were matters for either the full hearing of the dispute, or at the hearing of the disciplinary process commenced by the school against the teacher.

They were not something the court could take into account at this stage.

The judge accepted that the criteria had been made out to entitle the school to have the injunction put in place until pending the outcome of the full hearing.

Noting Burke’s intention not to purge his contempt, the judge directed that he return to Mountjoy.

The judge also ordered Burke to pay the legal costs the school has incurred for bringing the applications before the courts.

The matter was adjourned for a week.

Mallon argued to the court that the case before the judge was not about the teacher’s opposition to transgenderism, nor his objection to the school’s direction to staff last May to call “a boy”, as being “a girl” at the school.

Counsel said the court was being asked to rule on applications brought arising out of Burke’s refusal to comply with what the school says is the teacher’s “lawful suspension” arising out of allegations about his conduct.

Counsel said that the school had no wish to see Burke in prison but given his refusal to comply with the orders and his stated intention to attend at the school, her client was left with “no option” other than to bring proceedings before the High Court.


Representing himself, Burke disagreed with counsel submission’s regarding what the case is about.

Transgenderism, he said, was contrary to scripture, and that in this instance he would “only obey god”, and would “not obey man”.

He said that agreeing to comply with his suspension would be akin to agreeing with transgenderism.

During his submissions, Burke commended himself for his stance regarding the order, was critical of the courts regarding its treatment of him, and quoted the poet Robert Frost.

Burke also said that the disciplinary procedures against him by the school are flawed and described any allegation of gross misconduct against him as being “ludicrous”.

He said he had voiced his opposition to the school’s direction, he said the student at the centre of the request was not in any of his classes, nor had he had any direct dealings with that particular student.

School board claims

The school, located in Multyfarnham, Co Westmeath is the Church of Ireland’s Diocesan School for Meath and Kildare.

The board claims that despite being served with and being made aware of the making of interim injunction Burke had continued to attend at the school.

The school claims that his refusal to comply with the injunction may be disruptive to the school’s students at the beginning of the new academic year.

The court heard that Burke was placed on paid administrative leave pending the outcome of a disciplinary process commenced by the school, where he has been employed for several years, in Mid-August.

That process commenced after it is alleged that Burke publicly voiced his alleged opposition to the school principal’s direction to address a student by a different name and pronoun.

The school’s Board of Management had last week secured a High Court order against Burke preventing him from attending or teaching any classes at the school.

The order was obtained because the board claims that Burke was not abiding by the terms of his suspension, which it is alleged he believes is unlawful, by attending at the school.

The school claimed he would continue to attend the premises, in accordance with the teaching timetable assigned to him prior to his suspension, unless committed to prison.
The court also heard that a substitute teacher has been hired to teach his classes while he remains suspended.

The school says despite his suspension Burke has not been sanctioned and no finding has been made against him.

In correspondence to Burke the school denied that anyone is being “forced” to do anything.

The school said that it is focusing on the needs and welfare of its students and is affirming its policy in accordance with the 2000 Equal Status Act of not discriminating against any student.

It says it has acknowledged Burke’s religious beliefs but expects him to communicate with the student in accordance with the student and their parent’s wishes.

June anniversary dinner

The school claims that last June a service and dinner was held to mark its 260th anniversary.

It was attended by clergy, staff, past and present pupils, parents, and board members.
It is claimed that Burke interrupted the service and said that the school’s then principal, Niamh McShane, should withdraw the earlier demand regarding the student.

It is also claimed that he said that he could not agree with transgenderism, and said it went against the school’s ethos and the teaching of the Church of Ireland.

The school claims that after he spoke members of the congregation and students walked out of the school chapel where the service was being conducted.

It is claimed that at the follow-up dinner Burke did not sit at any table.

After the meal he is alleged to have approached the Principal, and again asked her to withdraw the request regarding the student.

Arising out of Burke’s alleged conduct a disciplinary process was commenced, and considered by the board, resulting in a decision to place him on administrative leave pending the outcome of the process.

The next stage of the disciplinary process is due to take place later this month.

With reporting by Hayley Halpin

Aodhan O Faolain