#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Dublin: 11°C Sunday 26 June 2022

French court dismisses appeal by magazine over topless photos of Duchess of Cambridge

A court had found Closer magazine guilty of invading the privacy of Prince William’s wife Kate.

The Duchess of Cambridge
The Duchess of Cambridge
Image: Doug Peters/EMPICS Entertainment via PA Images

A FRENCH COURT has dismissed an appeal by the editors of gossip magazine Closer, who were fined €45,000 for publishing pictures of the Duchess of Cambridge sunbathing topless in 2012.

The court in Versailles near Paris upheld the maximum fines imposed by a lower court last year, which found Closer guilty of invading the privacy of Prince William’s wife Kate.

It also confirmed that the celebrity magazine had to pay €100,000 in damages to the royal couple.

Closer published the grainy snaps of Kate wearing only bikini bottoms while on holiday with the prince at a chateau in the Luberon region of southeastern France in September 2012.

The pictures caused outrage among the British public and the royal family, which filed a criminal complaint and obtained a court injunction preventing further use of the images.

Even the British tabloids, usually voracious in their appetite for pictures of the royal family, declined to publish the images when they were first circulated.

In a letter read out in court in May last year, William said the case had brought back “particularly painful” memories of the paparazzi hounding his mother, the late princess Diana who was killed in a Paris car crash in 1997 while being pursued by photographers.

Lawyers for Closer editor Laurence Pieau and publisher Ernesto Mauri argued that the pictures of the royals were in the public interest and conveyed a “positive image” of them.

But the court of appeal rejected that argument and ordered both Pieau and Mauri to pay €45,000 in fines.

The court also upheld the fines handed to the two photographers suspected of taking the shots.

They were ordered to pay €5,000 each, and warned they faced additional €5,000 fines if they reoffended.

#Open journalism No news is bad news Support The Journal

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support us now

‘Dignity of a woman’

Closer’s lawyers had asked the court to either cancel or reduce the fines, arguing that they were excessive for a privacy case in France where fines and damages usually reach just a fraction of that seen in the United States or Britain.

But the prosecution had argued that the editors’ fines were commensurate with their offence and the penalties imposed on the photographers should be stiffened rather than eased.

“There was an absolutely unacceptable breach, not only of the privacy and the private lives of these two individuals, but also of the dignity of a woman,” French prosecutor Marc Brisset-Foucault told the court.

The royals, who have three children, had yet to react to the appeal court decision.

They had initially sought €1.5 million in damages, but said last year said they were “pleased” with the court’s verdict.

 © – AFP 2018

About the author:


Read next:


This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
write a comment

    Leave a commentcancel