Readers like you keep news free for everyone.
More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.
For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.
Readers like you keep news free for everyone.
More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.
For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION has today launched an “in-depth investigation” into whether Google’s planned $2.1 billion (€1.8 billion) purchase of smartwatch maker Fitbit would give it an unfair market advantage.
“Our investigation aims to ensure that control by Google over data collected through wearable devices as a result of the transaction does not distort competition,” EU competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager said.
In November last year, Google announced it had reached an agreement to buy Fitbit, which produces wearable fitness trackers and watches that communicate with a health monitoring app.
But Google’s own smartwatch performs a similar function and Brussels is concerned that acquiring Fitbit’s user data will strengthen its already powerful position in targeted advertising.
“The use of wearable devices by European consumers is expected to grow significantly in the coming years,” Vestager said in a European Commission statement announcing the probe.
“This will go hand in hand with an exponential growth of data generated through these devices. This data provides key insights about the life and the health situation of the users of these devices.”
Google has promised not to use Fitbit health and wellness data for Google ads, but the buy out has attracted concerns from consumer groups and Australia’s competition commission.
The European Commission now has 90 working days – or until December 9 – to carry out the investigation and decide whether to impose new conditions on Google.
Brussels has acknowledged that Google has created a data silo to keep users’ health data separate from its advertising platforms.
But it warned “that the data silo commitment proposed by Google is insufficient to clearly dismiss the serious doubts identified at this stage as to the effects of the transaction.
“Among others, this is because the data silo remedy did not cover all the data that Google would access as a result of the transaction and would be valuable for advertising purposes,” the statement said.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site