This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy. You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site. To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
OK
Dublin: 13 °C Thursday 19 September, 2019
Advertisement

Google tries to trademark the word 'Glass' but it's facing problems

The US Patent and Trademark office objected to the company’s bid saying the word glass was a “merely descriptive” term.

Image: AP Photo/John Minchillo

REMEMBER WHEN KING tried to trademark the word ‘Saga’, but was met with resistance? Google is currently facing the same problem as it tries to trademark the word ‘Glass’.

The company has been held back by the US Patent and Trademark Office which has voiced its concerns with the trademark bid, according to the Wall Street Journal.

There were two reasons for the objection. The first was it would cause confusion between Google’s product and other software and hardware trademarks that use the word, while the second is the word ‘Glass’ is “merely descriptive” according to the patent office. Generic terms don’t have trademark protection under US federal law.

Google has already successfully trademarked the term “Google Glass”, and the company has challenged the decision by providing a 1,928-page letter – roughly 1,900 pages are reportedly just clips of articles about Google Glass – in defense of the application.

It argued the amount of media coverage and attention Google Glass has received over the last few years wouldn’t result in confusion. It also disagreed with its use of the term “merely descriptive” saying “the frame and display components of the Glass device do not consist of glass at all.”

The patent office has yet to reach a final decision on the matter.

Read: Google’s decision to split stock into two sees positive start >

Read: Switzerland will be hosting the first ever bionic Olympics in 2016 >

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

About the author:

Quinton O'Reilly

Read next:

COMMENTS (31)