Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Chris Pizzello/AP/Press Association Images
Leveson

Heard at Leveson: Piers Morgan taught Jeremy Paxman how to hack phones

The tutorial happened at a lunch attended by Ulrika Johnson – who was teased by the tabloid editor about her relationship with the then English football manager Sven-Göran Eriksson.

BBC PRESENTER AND journalist Jeremy Paxman told the Leveson inquiry into media standards in the UK yesterday how former tabloid editor Piers Morgan showed him how to protect his mobile phone from hacks.

Describing a surreal lunch at the Daily Mirror in 2002, the presenter of Newsnight said he remembers the event because it was “so unusual to be invited into such a bestiary”. He said he can also recall the meal because he was “really struck by something Piers Morgan said”.

The guest list included the chairman of Trinity Mirror Sir Victor Blank, Topshop billionaire Sir Philip Green and TV star Ulrika Jonsson.

Earlier that year, Morgan’s newspaper had revealed details of an affair Jonsson had with then-English football coach Sven-Göran Eriksson. The relationship became a topic of conversation during the lunch.

Paxman recalled: “Morgan said, teasing Ulrika, that he knew what had happened in conversations between her and Sven-Göran Eriksson and he went into this mock Swedish accent.”

Careful not to accuse Morgan of actually hacking into her phone, Paxman said, “Now, I don’t know if he was repeating a conversation he had heard or if he was imagining this conversation. In fact to be fair to him, I think we should accept both possibilities. He probably was imagining it – it was a rather bad parody.”

Following that exchange, Paxman told the inquiry that Morgan turned to him and asked, “Have you got a mobile phone?”

On answering ‘Yes’, Morgan questioned him on his voicemail security settings.

I didn’t know what he was talking about and he then explained the way to get access to people’s messages was to go to the factory default settings and press 000 or 1234 and if you didn’t put on your own code, in his words, ‘You are a fool’.

Paxman insisted that he remembered the lunch ten years later because he was “quite struck by it”.

I am rather wet behind the ears in many of these things. I didn’t know that sort of thing went on.

“It was clearly something [Morgan] was familiar with – and I wasn’t. I didn’t know this went on. If you are to say as a journalist that I should have, I would have to accept that criticism.”

Morgan told the inquiry last year that he did not listen to any of Jonsson’s voicemails in relation to her affair with Eriksson. He also said he could not remember the lunch with Paxman and Jonsson.

The now-American based television presenter didn’t seem too phased by the evidence given, later tweeting:

The Leveson inquiry is examining allegations and incidences of phone hacking at a number of newspapers during the 1990s and 2000s. Morgan has denied any knowledge of the practise at any newspaper he presided over.

He did, however, concede to knowing a ‘little trick’ of hacking into voicemails – something he had included in his 2001 book.

More: Investigation launched into donations for British culture secretary>

Earlier: Piers Morgan denies presiding over phone hacking at Daily Mirror>

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
13
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.