Readers like you keep news free for everyone.

More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.

For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.

Support us today
Not now
Sunday 24 September 2023 Dublin: 16°C Independent candidate Mattie McGrath
# Mattie McGrath
Mattie McGrath to proceed with High Court action over Tipperary voting date
The ballot in Tipperary was called into question following the death of independent candidate Marese Skehan.

LAST UPDATE | Feb 5th 2020, 4:31 PM

OUTGOING INDEPENDENT TD and general election candidate Mattie McGrath is proceeding with a High Court action aimed at allowing the vote in the Tipperary constituency in this Saturday’s general election to proceed.

Lawyers representing the Tipperary politician told Mr Justice Charles Meenan this afternoon that despite various reports in the media that the vote will go ahead on Saturday their client is maintaining with his action as no official confirmation that the vote will proceed in the constituency on February 8th.

While significant steps are reported to have been taken in regards to when the Tipperary vote will take place Micheal P O’Higgins SC for McGrath told the court that his client wished to go ahead with his action.

The State, represented by Frank Callanan SC, with Michael Binchy Bl  said that issues raised by McGrath were under active consideration by the attorney general.

The ballot in Tipperary was called into question following the death of independent candidate Marese Skehan earlier this week.

As a result of her death the returning officer for Tipperary James Seymour, under the electoral laws issued a countermand that postponed the election in Tipperary to a later dater.

Arising out of the returning officer’s decision nominations for the five seat constituency would have to be reopened and fresh ballot papers would have to be issued.

McGrath, who was first elected as a TD in 2007, wants the vote in Tipperary to go ahead this weekend.

He also claims that while Seymour’s bona fides is not in any way under question the decision to countermand the poll, made under Section 62 if the 1992 Electoral Act, is unlawful and in breach of the constitution.

He claims the people of Tipperary would be disenfranchised,  precluded from having their TDs take part in discussions over the formation of the next government, and a danger of a skewed vote if they are not allowed to vote in the general election on Saturday.

He also argues that that postponing the election in Tipperary to some unknown date would prejudice Independent candidates.

Larger political parties, he says, would be able to “descend upon the constituency and devote disproportionate resources, and canvassing personnel” to Tipperary. 

He further claims that any new date for the election in Tipperary might not take place within the 30 days allowed for in the constitution after the Dail has been dissolved.

That 30 day limit, he argues, expires on February 13th.

McGrath says he does not believe it will be possible for any new poll in the constituency to take place by that date.

The politician, represented by Micheal O’Higgins SC with Liam Dockery Bl instructed by solicitor Alan Gannon initiated judicial review proceedings against Seymour,  the Minister for Housing, Planning and Local Government, Ireland and the Attorney General.

He seeks various orders and declarations aimed at having the returning officer’s decision quashed.  He is also challenging the constitutionality of sections of the 1992 Electoral Act. 

At the High Court today, O’Higgins said that his side needed time to finalise the paperwork associated with the application, and asked the court to hear it in the afternoon.

Counsel accepted that it could be the case that the action maybe resolved in the next 24 hours, but as things stood wanted to proceed with his case in the absence of any official confirmation that the vote in the five seat Tipperary constituency will take place on Saturday. 

In reply Callanan said his side did not have any documents in the case, and while broadly aware of the issues being raised by McGrath, were seeking to have the case adjourned to Thursday so they could consider their response. 

Mr Justice Meenan said he was satisfied to adjourn the matter to Thursday afternoon.

Aodhan O Faolain
Your Voice
Readers Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel