We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Only Fabrizio via Shutterstock

Student brings Department of Education to court over Leaving Cert Mandarin examination

The 15-year-old is challenging the requirement that examination answers must be in simplified Mandarin characters.

A SECONDARY SCHOOL student has brought a High Court challenge against an alleged refusal to accept answers given in Traditional Chinese characters in the Leaving Certificate Mandarin Chinese examination.

The Court heard that the curriculum requires that written answers given in the examination must be in simplified Mandarin characters, which are predominantly used in the People’s Republic of China, Singapore and Malaysia.

However, 15-year-old student Ethan Boone, who was born in Taiwan where traditional Mandarin characters are used, has challenged that requirement which he says is unlawful and illogical.

While he has lived outside of Taiwan for most of his life, his Taiwanese mother has been teaching him Mandarin using traditional Chinese characters, which the Court heard are also used in Hong Kong and Macau.

Suing through his mother, Cathy Ho, the applicant from Clonee in Co Dublin claims that the failure to allow for traditional characters in the marking of the Leaving Certificate exam is unlawful, under inclusive, and contrasts with the treatment of other languages by the Minister for Education and the State Examinations Committee.

It is also claimed that the Minister has unlawfully consulted with the Chinese Ministry for Education and that the Chinese Embassy is drawing up the curriculum for Mandarin Chinese.

It is claimed that the Department of Education entered a 2020 memo of understanding regarding the introduction of teaching Mandarin Chinese in Irish secondary schools with the People’s Republic of China’s Ministry of Education.

This agreement also included a recruitment of a Mandarin advisor, whose salary is paid by the Ministry, who would work with the Department of Education to develop Mandarin courses.

The Chinese Embassy in Dublin was updated regarding the development of the course in 2019, it is also claimed.

It is claimed that the 1998 Education Act allows the Minister to prescribe the curriculum for subjects following consultation with parties including trade unions, teachers, parents’ associations, and school patrons.

The Act does not permit consultation with a foreign government or ministry, it is alleged.

Boone claims that the Minister has refused his request to accept traditional characters.

His counsel Derek Shortall SC told the court that several other similar challenges over the refusal to accept traditional character in the exam are likely to be made before the courts.

In judicial review proceedings against the Minister for Education, The National Council for Curriculum and Assessment, the State Examinations Commission, Ireland and the Attorney General, the applicant seeks various orders and reliefs.

These include an order requiring both the Minister and the State Examinations Commission to ensure that the marking of Leaving Cert Examination Mandarin Chinese exams shall consider any answer written in Traditional Mandarin Chinese characters.

He also seeks various declarations including that the rules governing the examination of Leaving Certificate Chines are unlawful, unreasonable and are contrary to the Constitution, EU law, the 1998 Education Act and the European Convention on Human Rights.

He further seeks a declaration that a circular regarding the Leaving Cert Chinese examination impermissibly takes into account a memo of understanding between China’s Ministry of Education and the Irish Department of Education for the introduction of Mandarin Chinese language teaching in Irish secondary schools.

At Monday’s sitting of the High Court Mr Justice Anthony Barr said he was prepared to grant the applicant permission, on an ex-parte basis, to bring his challenge.

The judge that while he was prepared to grant leave, he did have “considerable sympathy” for the State respondents given that persons from China and other countries favour the simplified Mandarin characters.

The judge added that proceedings themselves are “very unusual.”

The matter was made returnable to a date in October.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.