Source: Businessinsider

• 7 signs you're building wealth faster than you think
• The Celebrity Edge was named the best new cruise ship of 2018. It has a 14,000 square-foot spa and a luxury suite that comes with a butler — here's what it looks like.
• Facebook content moderation firm forced on-site therapists to disclose counseling details with employees, according to report
• 'We want our country to do it first': A NASA executive says a US-China Mars mission is not in the cards

IF YOU WANT to know what the human and financial losses of a global pandemic for something like Ebola would look like, someone’s already figured it out.

In a post last year, risk modeling gurus AIR calculated that the 1918 Spanish Flu killed between 20 and 100 million people (out of a global population of 1.8 billion) and caused the equivalent of $20 billion in global losses.

AIR then plugged the 1918 pandemic data into 21st century population density and development parameters to come up with a model for what a new Spanish Flu or other serious global pandemic would look like today.

It ain’t pretty.

First, there’s the map above, showing the casualty ratio by country. As might unfortunately be imagined, developing nations fare the worst, while Western nations see the fewest casualties.

Ireland would see between 25 and 50 casualties per 100,000 members of the population.

But fewest is a relative term. Here’s their table breaking down casualties for a modified G-7 (replacing Italy with Australia):

Source: AIR

It seems safe to conclude from this that whatever it costs to minimise the risk of a global pandemic will pale in comparison to trying to control it once it arrives.

Read: Video: What exactly is the Ebola virus?