Readers like you keep news free for everyone.

More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.

For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.

Support us today
Not now
Friday 1 December 2023 Dublin: 2°C

Man who claimed he was falsely accused of not paying for a jambon pastry awarded €20,000

Anthony Maher claimed that in August 2014 he bought and paid for several items at Centra Corduff in Blanchardstown before being questioned by two staff members.

Jambon 1 File photo of a jambon.

A DUBLIN MAN, who claimed he was falsely accused of not paying for a jambon pastry, has been awarded €20,000 damages in the Circuit Civil Court for defamation.

Anthony Maher claimed that on 7 August 2014 he bought and paid for a number of items at Centra Corduff in Blanchardstown, Dublin, and had been followed outside the store by two staff members.

Maher, of Fortunestown in Tallaght, said that one of the staff members, Marian Fletcher, told him that he had not paid for the jambon he had bought from the deli counter.

He told his barrister, Maeve Cox, that he tried to explain he had paid for all of the items but Fletcher had asked him to go back into the store where he pointed out to her the cashier who had served him.

Maher said that as the cashier had not remembered him he had asked for the till and security cameras to be checked, arguing he was not a thief. There had been customers inside and outside the store throughout the incident.

Cox, who appeared with John O’Leary Solicitors, said Maher had felt obliged to remain in the shop until the matter was resolved to their satisfaction despite having done nothing wrong.

He said he was eventually informed that it was okay and not to worry about it. On his way out he had spoken to Fletcher about the incident and about the fact that he was innocent.

Maher, who sued Damast Limited (which trades as Centra Corduff) of Donaghmede, Dublin, claimed Fletcher had told him that there was fault on both sides as the deli assistant should have given him a receipt.

He alleged that the words spoken meant that he was guilty of criminal or dishonest conduct, was a thief, a liar and a person of disreputable and low moral character.

The store had denied his allegations in a full defence. It denied he had been followed and alleged that Fletcher had just questioned him about the deli item at the till while she was serving him.

Judge Francis Comerford said shops were entitled to enquire about their goods as long as it was done in a reasonable manner. He says sometimes shops make mistakes and the person being questioned feels insulted.

Judge Comerford said in this case, the defendant denied the incident described by Maher had happened at all and now accuses him of making a fraudulent and malicious claim.

The Judge said the store ignored six letters sent by Maher’s legal team about the incident and only started to reply to them after he had issued legal proceedings. Awarding Maher €20,000 damages, he said he would have expected the store to answer the initial letters to point out that the incident never happened.

Read: Prisoner who attacked psychiatrist with sharpened paint roller gets 3 years jail-term

Read: Eircom fined for over-charging nuns’ nursing home and leaving it without phone service for weeks

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.