We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

A search team member from the Danish Emergency Services looks for body parts following the death of journalist Kim Wall Ole Jensen - Corbis

Danish inventor accused of murder says journalist was killed by toxic fumes

An expert has said Peter Madsen’s claim is implausible, if not impossible.

A LEADING SUBMARINE expert has challenged Danish inventor Peter Madsen’s claim that Swedish journalist Kim Wall was killed by toxic fumes in his homemade vessel last year, as he faces trial for her murder.

Madsen, 47, who is accused of premeditated murder, sexual assault and desecration of a corpse, has said her death was accidental since the first day of his trial on 8 March.

He said Wall, 30, died when a hatch fell on her head, but later changed his story after an autopsy concluded there had been no damage to her skull.

Madsen has admitted dismembering her body and throwing it overboard, but denies premeditated murder and sexual assault.

The self-taught engineer said the freelance journalist died when the air pressure suddenly dropped and toxic fumes filled his vessel on the night of 10 August 2017, while he was up on the deck.

Ditte Dyreborg, a prominent lieutenant commander in the Royal Danish Navy, said Madsen’s explanations were implausible, if not impossible, as she spoke in a Copenhagen court today.

“We did not find anything. No CO (carbon monoxide), no CO2 (carbon dioxide), no NOx (nitrogen oxide) – which we would have if the submarine engine was running with carbon monoxide in it,” Dyreborg, who was the first person to inspect the vessel on 11 August, said.

Seemingly irritated and agitated, Madsen took notes during Dyreborg’s testimony and whispered technical questions into his lawyer’s ear, according to an AFP reporter at the scene.

‘Perverse polymorph’ 

A coroner told a 22 March hearing that there was no conclusive evidence to prove Wall’s cause of death beyond doubt, adding she was probably strangled or had her throat cut.

The coroner could however not rule out poisoning as a result of toxic fumes.

Madsen’s lawyer, Betina Hald Engmark, questioned the relevance of Dyreborg’s expertise on smaller and private submarines, concluding the lieutenant commander did not carry out any tests on the vessel’s air filters.

The prosecution, which is seeking a life sentence for Madsen, claims he tortured and killed Wall as part of a sexual fantasy.

Wall’s body parts, weighed down with metal objects, were recovered from waters off Copenhagen. She also had 14 stab wounds to her genital area.

The first hearings focused on the inner workings of the eccentric inventor described by psychiatric experts as a “perverse polymorph” with “psychopathic traits”.

The verdict is expected on 25 April.

Comments are closed due to ongoing legal proceedings. 

© AFP 2018 

Read: Man accused of killing journalist on submarine described himself as a ‘loving psychopath’, court hears

Read: Swedish journalist ‘was strangled or had her throat cut’ on submarine