Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Dominic Lipinski

Kit Kat told it doesn't legally own shape of four-fingered chocolate bar

Nestle has already lost a legal bid in Britain to trademark the Kit Kat shape.

KIT KAT HAS been told it doesn’t legally own the shape of its famous chocolate bar.

Nestle has been in a decade-long battle with Cadbury to claim exclusive rights over the four-fingered wafer biscuit which was first sold in 1935.

But today the European Court of Justice told the confectionary giant that it can’t own the design of Kit Kat’s four-fingers and found that a previous court had been right to annul the decision by Europe’s trademark group.

The EU’s intellectual property office allowed Nestle in 2006 to trademark what the court calls the “three-dimensional shape of the ‘Kit Kat 4 fingers’ product”.

But today the ECJ told intellectual property officials to reconsider whether its shape can still be considered an EU trademark.

This trademark has helped keep copycat candy-bars out of grocery stores, and punished the development of similar treats owned by Mondelez, including the Norwegian favourite Kvikk Lunsj.

The EU’s intellectual property office must now go back to the drawing board and revisit its 2006 to decision to grant Kit Kat an EU trade mark based on its shape.

The Norwegian bar Kvikk Lunsj has been made since 1937. Its makers Mondelez also own Cadbury, Milka, Oreo, and Toblerone – and Cadbury took issue with Nestlé’s trademark.

A court source told AFP, “Today no one has won, no one has lost. Nestle has saved time because its brand remains registered for the time being.

“But Nestlé did lose a battle as it would have preferred a full confirmation of the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) decision.”

The EU’s intellectual property office “must reconsider whether the three-dimensional shape of a ’4 Finger KitKat’ can be retained as an EU trade mark,” a court statement said.

At issue is that the food giant specifically failed to provide evidence that the Kit Kat shape was well enough known in Belgium, Ireland, Greece and Portugal.

The trade mark criteria “must be shown throughout the EU,” it said.

Additional reporting by AFP

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Cliodhna Russell
View 23 comments
Close
23 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds