#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Dublin: 7°C Sunday 28 February 2021

A tobacco giant's legal challenge against plain packaging has been rejected

Philip Morris accused Australia of using a procedural issue to avoid addressing the legality and effectiveness of plain packages, calling the move “regrettable”.

Cigarette packaging

AN AUSTRALIAN LAW requiring cigarettes to be sold in plain packaging has received a boost after an international tribunal said it would not hear a tobacco company’s legal challenge.

The government in Canberra today welcomed the decision by the Permanent Court of Arbitration to refuse jurisdiction over a case brought by smoking giant Philip Morris.

“Plain packaging is a legitimate public health measure, which is consistent with Australia’s international legal obligations,” said Rural Health Minister Fiona Nash, who is responsible for tobacco policy.

We welcome the unanimous decision by the tribunal agreeing with Australia’s position that it has no jurisdiction to hear Philip Morris’s claim.
Smoking does untold harm to Australians, causing deaths from cancer; lung and heart disease, and hurting families.

In 2012, Australia became the first country to mandate plain packaging for cigarettes, in a bid to reduce smoking rates.

Ireland is due to introduce plain packaging in May 2017, a move also facing legal challenges.

In a statement, Minister James Reilly, who introduced the legislation during his time as health minister, welcomed the “leadership” shown by the Australian government.

“I admire their courage in standing up to the tobacco industry again and again in legal challenges,” it read, “Today is a great day for the future health of Australian children.”

Plain pack cigarettes Source: Niall Carson/PA Wire

I am pleased to say that the Irish government is equally committed to standing up to the tobacco industry. A key benefit of the introduction of plain packaging is to try and prevent children from taking up this killer habit in the first place.
We will never put the profits of the tobacco industry ahead of the future health of our children.

Big tobacco firms including Philip Morris International, British American Tobacco, Imperial Tobacco and Japan Tobacco International have launched legal challenges against such laws, arguing they impinge on their trademark intellectual property.

The Permanent Court of Arbitration, established to settle international disputes, declined to comment on its decision to refuse jurisdiction for the arbitration proceedings in Singapore.

Philip Morris accused Australia of using a procedural issue to avoid addressing the legality and effectiveness of plain packages, calling the move “regrettable”.

“There is nothing in today’s outcome that addresses, let alone validates, plain packaging in Australia or anywhere else,” Philip Morris’ senior vice president and general counsel Marc Firestone said in a statement Friday, adding that his firm was reviewing the decision to determine its response.

This case has never been about a government’s undeniable authority to regulate in the public interest. Nor has there ever been any question that tobacco products merit strict oversight.

“In our view, the real point is simply this: even when pursuing tobacco control objectives, governments are still accountable if they choose to use unlawful means.”

Philip Morris launched the challenge in 2011 after plain-packaging legislation was passed, using a 1993 trade deal between Australia and Hong Kong that included foreign investment protections.

Four tobacco firms including Philip Morris in 2012 lost a legal challenge against the laws in the High Court of Australia, which found they did not breach the nation’s constitution.

© AFP 2015additional reporting by Nicky Ryan

Read: Big Tobacco says plain-packaging laws are a ‘failure’ – are they telling the truth? >

About the author:


Read next: