We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Shutterstock/Jiri Flogel

Someone's launched a (very) last minute challenge against same-sex marriage

Gerry Walshe, an electrician from Clare, wants a judicial review.

Updated at 10:50pm

A FRESH LEGAL challenge is to be brought against the result of the same-sex marriage referendum.

The latest challenge has been brought by Gerry Walshe, an electrician, of Lisdeen, Co Clare.

The Supreme Court last week refused to permit separate legal actions brought by both Walshe and Maurice Lyons, from Callan, Co Kilkenny, to bring further appeals against the rejection of their challenges to the Yes result of the same-sex marriage referendum.

The court said:

“It would not be necessary in the interests of justice that there be an appeal to the Supreme Court.”

However in a new application, to be made before the duty Judge at tomorrow’s vacation sitting of the Court, Walshe will ask the High Court for permission to bring proceedings against the State by way of judicial review.


The latest action is understood to relate to the decision by the State to issue and sign the final referendum certificate in August although a challenge (namely Walsh’s legal action which was ultimately dismissed by the Supreme Court) against the result was still in being.

The bill formally allowing same-sex couples to marry will pass through the Dail and Seanad over the coming days and weeks.

In its decision last week the Supreme Court ruled neither Mr Walshe nor Mr Lyons had met the requirements for a Supreme Court appeal as neither had raised the necessary legal point of general public importance, had raised no points “of substance” and the interests of justice did not require they be given permission to appeal.

It also noted that because no stay had been placed on the certificate of the referendum result after the Court of Appeal decision, “very serious constitutional consequences” might have occurred had it decided to grant leave to appeal.

It said both men, who represented themselves, had sought in separate actions initiated on June 2nd to challenge a provisional referendum certificate.


The High Court dismissed their proceedings on June 5th.

The Court of Appeal upheld that decision on July 30th when it dismissed both appeals against the High Court refusal and also lifted the stay on the issuing of final referendum certificate.

The men sought to have their appeals heard by the Supreme Court.

First published at 6:39pm

Read: Men press on with their legal challenges against the marriage referendum

Read: Contoversy in Australia over new film about kids with gay parents

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Aodhan O'Faolain and Ray Managh
Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.