Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Astrobotic Technology’s lander developed a ‘critical’ fuel leak just hours after yesterday's launch Craig Bailey/Florida Today/PA Images
peregrine

First US moon landing attempt in over 50 years abandoned after spacecraft hit by fuel leak

Astrobotic Technology’s Peregrine lander began losing fuel soon after Monday’s launch

A CRIPPLING FUEL leak has forced a US company to give up on landing a spacecraft on the moon.

Astrobotic Technology’s lander began losing fuel soon after Monday’s launch. The spacecraft also encountered problems keeping its solar panel pointing towards the sun and generating solar power.

“Given the propellant leak, there is, unfortunately, no chance of a soft landing on the moon,” Astrobotic said in a statement.

Astrobotic had been targeting a lunar landing on February 23 after a roundabout, fuel-efficient flight to the moon.

It could have been the first US moon landing in more than 50 years, and the first by a private company. 

A second lander from a Houston company is due to launch next month. Nasa gave the two companies millions to build and fly their own lunar landers.

Only four countries have pulled off a successful moon landing.

The company said the new goal was to keep the lander operating as long as possible in space to learn as much as possible for its next mission a year or so from now.

Flight controllers managed to keep the spacecraft pointing toward the sun and its battery fully charged, with another 40 hours of operations expected.

It soon became apparent, however, that there was “a critical loss of fuel”, further dimming hope for what had been a planned moon landing on 23 February.

The Pittsburgh-based company did not elaborate on why the Peregrine lander’s propellant system failed just hours into the flight.

Nasa paid Astrobotic $108 million dollars (€98 million) to fly its experiments to the moon on this mission, part of the agency’s commercial lunar programme.

Before the flight, Nasa’s Joel Kearns, deputy associate administrator for exploration, noted that while using private companies to make deliveries to the moon will be cheaper and quicker than going the usual government route, there will be added risk.

He stressed that the space agency was willing to accept that risk, noting yesterday: “Each success and setback are opportunities to learn and grow.”

A key component of PITMS, which will explore the Moon’s atmosphere by measuring water and other molecules, was developed in the UK with £14 million of government funding through the UK’s membership of the European Space Agency.

The data collected will contribute to our understanding of the Moon’s potential to provide resources such as water, opening new possibilities for future human presence on the lunar surface.

Author
Press Association
Your Voice
Readers Comments
47
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel