Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File photo Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP/Press Association Images
Australia

Nurofen could be fined $6m for misleading consumers about painkillers

The products in question claimed to target specific pains.

THE MAKERS OF Nurofen should be fined $6 million (just over €4 million) for misleading customers, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has found.

In December the country’s federal court found that manufacturer Reckitt Benckiser, a British company, had misled people by advertising certain products as targeting specific types of pain despite containing the same active ingredient.

The court ordered that the products in question, which supposedly targeted migraines, back pain, period pain and tension headaches, be removed from shelves within three months.

All the products contained 342mg of ibuprofen lysine, which gives faster relief than standard ibuprofen, and cost up to twice as much as regular Nurofen products.

ABC reports that in a hearing to determine penalties lawyers for Reckitt Benckiser told the court “rational” consumers would not think a pain-specific product was any more effective than a regular one.

However, Katrina Banks-Smith SC, the barrister for the ACCC, said Reckitt Benckiser made “substantial profits” from its misleading marketing and a large fine was warranted.

She said consumers “purchased a product they thought was special and it wasn’t”.

During the hearing, Justice James Edelman joked that the weight of the evidence may induce a headache. He has reserved his decision on the penalty until next week.

Read: Nurofen products pulled from the shelves over ‘misleading claims’

Your Voice
Readers Comments
39
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.